In Reply to: What Is The Average Objectivists Beliefs On Wires? posted by thetubeguy1954 on August 25, 2006 at 09:47:17:
I am afraid, thetubeguy, that some people will only ever be interested in denying you (and many others) your experience of hearing different cables sound different. Because if they had ever heard these differences for themselves they, like you after hearing differences for yourself, would no longer be able to dismiss other people's experiences so readily. They would no longer be able to use the dismissive sentences they do.Yes, you and others are correct. You CAN hear differences between different metals used as a conductor, between different plastic insulation materials (different chemical mixes !!), between different colours of insulation materials, between different configurations and designs, and (as described below) some identical cables connected in a different direction.
Comments by John Atkinson from Hi Fi News October 1983 issue.
"I had an interesting conversation with a contributor to HFN/RR some months back. "Isn't it time", I was asked, "that we organised a test to show that this business about cables being directional is a load of rubbish, dreamed up by unscrupulous con men ?"
How could a phenomenon like directionality in conductors, therefore, have been missed by researchers all this time ? Surely it is too much to believe that it hid if an engineer bearing measuring equipment approached, but it was only too willing to be heard if carrying a music signal ? My initial reaction, therefore, to this 'new' fact, was to dismiss it as moonshine. However, a less-than-open mind is nothing to be proud of, even when confronted with statements which appear to contradict everything which appear to contradict everything one has learnt or been told........ No one has yet come up with any reason as to why two different types of cable sound different, but that is no reason to dismiss the results of listening tests. The dogmatic approach adopted by some engineers and scientists that a phenomenon can't be held to exist until it can be satisfactorily explained, is obviously unsound...." John Atkinson.John goes on to describe a experiment he and his wife were involved in. (To be brief) - Under single- blind listening tests, they both consistently identified the difference between A and B only to be told later that the only difference between A and B was the direction of the one metre length of interconnect between pre and power amps !
John concludes his article with the sentence "In the meantime, something is going on, and we don't know what it is, do we?"Then, in the November 1983 issue of Hi Fi News, John comments that Bob Stuart of Meridian had told him that care is taken in production of his new Meridian modular amp - to ensure that cable is connected the preferred way round. He (Bob) can't yet explain why it should sound better one way round than the other.
Just who are people prepared to believe ?
The John Atkinsons., the Bob Stuarts., the Julian Vereker's (who wrote in Hi Fi News 1995 that they were somewhat alarmed when some new cable with parameters they had particularly specified did not 'sound' good)., the Jean Hiragas (Editor of the French 'Revue du Son' who instigated the whole 'cable controversy' over 25 years ago by stating that he could hear differences in different wires) of this world.
OR
The engineers as just quoted by Soundmind "To the electrical engineer who is far better informed than the "average" objectivist and who is an objectivist by training and must remain an objectivist to survive and who is NOT in this industry, audiophile wires are a joke. They shake their heads at the whole thing."
OR
Such as Peter Baxandall (a very well respected UK audio guru during the mid 1990s) who said in 1985
"I do not believe that the type or quality of dielectric used in LF coupling capacitors is of any significance whatsoever."
"I do not believe that the use of expensive, special loudspeaker cable - no matter which way round they are connected - confers any sonic benefit whatever."
"I believe that all this recent business about single-crystal, high purity, oxygen-free, connecting cable is just a load of absolute hogwash."The point at which people have to start is NOT 'that it cannot happen, that if you heard changes in the sound then you must have imagined it' but that IT HAPPENS, that people CAN hear changes in the sound - and if it happens, if it changes the sound then, if you are involved in audio, if you claim to be a 'professional in audio', then you have to start at that point by saying "Something is going on. What is it?"
Regards,
May Belt.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Re: What Is The Average Objectivists Beliefs On Wires? - May Belt 10:55:33 08/27/06 (88)
- Reversesd cables sound different can be explained. - cheap-Jack 12:28:53 08/28/06 (26)
- The effect is most audible between 100,000,000 hz and 400,000,000 hz where it's unmistakable unless you're tone deaf nt - Soundmind 15:02:53 08/28/06 (16)
- Substantiate your claim please. - cheap-Jack 16:02:55 08/28/06 (15)
- Re: Substantiate your claim please. - Soundmind 16:11:50 08/28/06 (14)
- Fine example of simplistic reasoning - E-Stat 18:31:29 08/28/06 (13)
- Re: Fine example of simplistic reasoning - Michael Y 03:16:08 08/30/06 (6)
- Tune an AM radio off station near a high RF source like a CD player - E-Stat 05:48:25 08/30/06 (5)
- Re: Tune an AM radio off station near a high RF source like a CD player - Dan Banquer 06:33:37 08/30/06 (4)
- Evidently, Dan - E-Stat 06:59:13 08/30/06 (3)
- They're not interested. - Dan Banquer 07:58:09 08/30/06 (2)
- What's the FCC doing? - Atexanathome 15:28:32 08/30/06 (1)
- Re: What's the FCC doing? - Dan Banquer 17:06:09 08/30/06 (0)
- Interesting point - unclestu52 20:37:16 08/28/06 (0)
- Re: Fine example of simplistic reasoning - Soundmind 18:37:16 08/28/06 (4)
- Gee, has Johnny Neutron corrected your speculative theory (very gently) too much recently? - E-Stat 18:54:38 08/28/06 (3)
- sheesh..go on vaca for 10 days, and they forget my name.. - jneutron 07:34:37 09/05/06 (1)
- In repentance - E-Stat 08:21:51 09/06/06 (0)
- Re: Gee, has Johnny Neutron corrected your speculative theory (very gently) too much recently? - Soundmind 03:13:26 08/29/06 (0)
- Re: Reversesd cables sound different can be explained. - john curl 13:53:08 08/28/06 (8)
- Please don't confuse the issue. (long) - cheap-Jack 07:48:43 08/29/06 (7)
- Re: Please don't confuse the issue. (long) - john curl 23:50:41 08/29/06 (6)
- It should not be coaxial which is non-directional. (nt) - cheap-Jack 06:59:33 08/30/06 (5)
- Re: It should not be coaxial which is non-directional. (nt) - john curl 11:33:09 08/30/06 (4)
- Good question. - cheap-Jack 12:45:02 08/30/06 (3)
- Re: Good question. - john curl 13:19:36 08/30/06 (2)
- Oooops, it means no logic. (nt) - cheap-Jack 13:45:56 08/30/06 (0)
- Re: Good question. - Soundmind 13:33:35 08/30/06 (0)
- Good one, May! (Suggest you bother no further to reply to sarcastic male harridans.) nt - clarkjohnsen 09:14:52 08/28/06 (29)
- Re: Good one, May! (Suggest you bother no further to reply to sarcastic male harridans.) nt - May Belt 09:03:45 08/29/06 (28)
- "The fact that it has happened has to be dealt with." Or, not. Look at the magazines: - clarkjohnsen 08:00:29 08/30/06 (3)
- Re: "The fact that it has happened has to be dealt with." Or, not. Look at the magazines: - Soundmind 08:54:31 08/30/06 (2)
- The lies continue unabated; it becomes my lot to make sure the offending posts don't simply disappear. - clarkjohnsen 09:10:56 08/30/06 (1)
- And you've succeeded. You've certainly been active putting them up and you never delete them. - Soundmind 09:16:14 08/30/06 (0)
- Save the snake oil for the Indians - Soundmind 12:21:54 08/29/06 (19)
- A cable is "an attenuator", my friend. (nt) - cheap-Jack 12:34:49 08/29/06 (18)
- Not deliberately - Soundmind 12:56:20 08/29/06 (17)
- Enough is enough. Quit your soap shows please. (nt) - cheap-Jack 06:51:10 08/30/06 (4)
- What's your problem, don't confuse us with the facts, our minds are made up? I get it. - Soundmind 08:17:02 08/30/06 (3)
- How "actually much worse" ??? - cheap-Jack 13:28:54 08/30/06 (2)
- Cheap-Jack, Consider The Source - thetubeguy1954 09:38:42 08/31/06 (1)
- Re: Cheap-Jack, Consider The Source - john curl 12:19:36 08/31/06 (0)
- That's part of the equation - E-Stat 14:51:27 08/29/06 (11)
- Right, where can we get a "perfect cable"? - cheap-Jack 06:45:34 08/30/06 (0)
- Re: That's part of the equation - Soundmind 16:21:25 08/29/06 (9)
- You're not learning - E-Stat 17:47:55 08/29/06 (8)
- No, I'm teaching - Soundmind 17:58:38 08/29/06 (7)
- Only to those who don't know better - E-Stat 19:04:51 08/29/06 (6)
- Why waste yr time on soapy nuts? (nt) - cheap-Jack 07:06:36 08/30/06 (5)
- Good question - E-Stat 07:50:27 08/30/06 (4)
- Mind you.. - cheap-Jack 13:04:05 08/30/06 (3)
- Re: Mind you.. - john curl 13:51:21 08/30/06 (2)
- I am listening.. - cheap-Jack 18:19:31 08/30/06 (1)
- Re: I am listening.. - john curl 18:51:10 08/30/06 (0)
- Subjectivity is a basic instinct, but can be rational. - cheap-Jack 12:16:54 08/29/06 (3)
- "Can't explain at all as CD is 100% non-contact laser sensing." Hmm... - clarkjohnsen 07:38:35 08/30/06 (2)
- Re: "Can't explain at all as CD is 100% non-contact laser sensing." Hmm... - Soundmind 09:29:54 08/30/06 (1)
- You're as risibly wrong as ever and shamelessly flaunting it. Bless you for being such a bad example to all. nt - clarkjohnsen 09:34:48 08/30/06 (0)
- So tell us all May so that we can get it right..... - Soundmind 11:31:49 08/27/06 (30)
- What an argument !!! - cheap-Jack 13:20:17 08/28/06 (27)
- Re: What an argument !!! - Soundmind 15:06:37 08/28/06 (26)
- I got to be "fortunate" or my ears are all rusted. - cheap-Jack 08:26:42 08/29/06 (20)
- Re: I got to be "fortunate" or my ears are all rusted. - Soundmind 13:04:58 08/29/06 (17)
- You've never answered this question before - E-Stat 15:19:54 08/29/06 (16)
- Re: You've never answered this question before - Soundmind 16:15:00 08/29/06 (15)
- Ja wul, commandant - E-Stat 17:35:47 08/29/06 (14)
- Re: Ja wul, commandant - Soundmind 18:08:49 08/29/06 (13)
- Ah, I knew the villain had to be audiophiles somehow - E-Stat 19:01:05 08/29/06 (12)
- Re: Ah, I knew the villain had to be audiophiles somehow - Soundmind 08:29:34 08/30/06 (11)
- Hey, big surprise - I agree with your first point! - E-Stat 09:39:28 08/30/06 (10)
- There's always an excuse - Soundmind 09:57:20 08/30/06 (9)
- Exposure! - E-Stat 10:16:29 08/30/06 (8)
- Re: Exposure! - Soundmind 10:24:53 08/30/06 (7)
- There are individual characteristics of musical reproduction - E-Stat 10:41:29 08/30/06 (6)
- Re: There are individual characteristics of musical reproduction - Soundmind 11:03:25 08/30/06 (5)
- Hmmm, milder tone here - E-Stat 11:44:18 08/30/06 (4)
- Re: Hmmm, milder tone here - Soundmind 12:06:17 08/30/06 (3)
- Good points here, different experience - E-Stat 13:19:44 08/30/06 (2)
- Re: Good points here, different experience - Soundmind 14:05:41 08/30/06 (1)
- I sit corrected - E-Stat 14:29:31 08/30/06 (0)
- Priorities - E-Stat 10:11:36 08/29/06 (1)
- I second your "vote". - cheap-Jack 12:46:03 08/29/06 (0)
- As for me - E-Stat 18:24:00 08/28/06 (4)
- Re: As for me - Soundmind 18:35:38 08/28/06 (3)
- Is that why - E-Stat 19:09:40 08/28/06 (2)
- Which Stereophile test CD is it? (nt) - cheap-Jack 07:55:18 08/29/06 (1)
- I have three of them, but used STPH 002-2 dated 1990 - E-Stat 09:57:10 08/29/06 (0)
- Re: So tell us all May so that we can get it right..... - May Belt 13:55:37 08/27/06 (1)
- Re: So tell us all May so that we can get it right..... - Soundmind 14:03:18 08/27/06 (0)