In Reply to: It really doesn' matter if Rock and Pop record in DSD... posted by TommyTunes on March 20, 2009 at 05:35:08:
"You can't go back and re-record all the wonderful music that has been created over the years. I'm not a fan of most contemporary performers, so the point is moot. I'm a music lover first and an audiophile second. I simply want to hear recordings that I love in the best possible sound."
but you can go back and transfer all original master tapes into high resolution DSD, actually Sony already did that, they transferred many master tapes into DSD but they are not yet released as SACDs.
It's a pure comedy in 2009 to transfer master tape (which has musical information up to 50kHz) into ultra low resolution 16-bit/44,1kHz format.
wake up people - today even blu-ray video concerts are recorded in 24bit/48kHz resolution! ultra low resolution 16-bit/44,1kHz CD is a digital standard from 1980 :(
It's high time we finally got all original master tapes transferred into DSD, and it's especially needed today, as we all happily see drastically dropping CD sales and the CD format is dying, it's most natural thing to see a high definition successor of old compact disc...
--
pro-CD trolls bark, but the hi-rez SACD caravan goes on...
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- RE: It really doesn' matter if Rock and Pop record in DSD... - Hiro 10:13:49 03/20/09 (48)
- RE: My dear kekel from teh parallell universe. - navman 10:46:18 03/20/09 (47)
- Whatever happen's please remain calm!! - jazz1 20:24:51 03/20/09 (1)
- LOL............................. - navman 20:45:05 03/20/09 (0)
- RE: My dear kekel from teh parallell universe. - Hiro 13:06:17 03/20/09 (44)
- RE: My dear kekel from teh parallell universe. - Interested 13:48:47 03/20/09 (19)
- I totally disagree, record companies MUST spend the money for an SACD layer or they will die! - Teresa 17:49:47 03/20/09 (5)
- RE: I totally disagree, record companies MUST spend the money for an SACD layer or they will die! - Interested 19:38:16 03/20/09 (4)
- no, it is you who are totally and completely deluded. - Hiro 02:45:20 03/21/09 (0)
- RE: I totally disagree, record companies MUST spend the money for an SACD layer or they will die! - Ben Van Dyk 20:56:42 03/20/09 (0)
- If the SACD layer was added to all CDs, the majority of the public will buy - Teresa 20:24:03 03/20/09 (1)
- RE: If the SACD layer was added to all CDs, the majority of the public will buy - Interested 05:13:28 03/21/09 (0)
- RE: My dear kekel from teh parallell universe. - Hiro 14:27:39 03/20/09 (12)
- I beg to differ. - navman 14:35:35 03/20/09 (11)
- RE: I beg to differ. - Hiro 14:48:01 03/20/09 (4)
- RE: I beg to differ. - navman 16:17:05 03/20/09 (3)
- RE: I beg to differ. - Hiro 16:34:24 03/20/09 (2)
- RE: I beg to differ. - Tony Lauck 17:54:51 03/20/09 (1)
- At least my view is that - navman 20:19:40 03/20/09 (0)
- RE: I beg to differ. - Hiro 14:42:56 03/20/09 (5)
- Same with 4-5Gigs - navman 16:15:17 03/20/09 (4)
- 4,7GB (SACD) is enough for high resolution music - Hiro 16:28:59 03/20/09 (3)
- RE: Limiting. - navman 19:54:43 03/20/09 (2)
- RE: Limiting. - Hiro 02:08:46 03/21/09 (1)
- Really? - navman 04:33:23 03/21/09 (0)
- BTW - navman 13:13:16 03/20/09 (23)
- RE: BTW - Teresa 18:01:01 03/20/09 (1)
- Maybe I should sell you all of mines - navman 19:58:21 03/20/09 (0)
- RE: BTW - Hiro 13:34:43 03/20/09 (20)
- Hiro....... could you ost up your system? - navman 20:25:30 03/20/09 (7)
- RE: Hiro....... could you ost up your system? - chris.redmond2@bushinternet.com 08:02:01 03/22/09 (6)
- I am sure I could guess at their systems. - navman 19:15:08 03/23/09 (5)
- MC-SACDs is not a troll, you are. You do know this forum is about SACD software and hardware don't you? - Teresa 02:03:49 03/24/09 (4)
- RE: MC-SACDs is not a troll, you are. You do know this forum is about SACD software and hardware don't you? - chris.redmond2@bushinternet.com 02:15:09 03/24/09 (3)
- You are making NO SENSE WHATSOEVER, Mr. Troll. - Teresa 02:25:12 03/24/09 (2)
- Hearing vs. Claiming to hear - Tony Lauck 08:20:27 03/24/09 (0)
- RE: You are making NO SENSE WHATSOEVER, Mr. Troll. - chris.redmond2@bushinternet.com 08:12:27 03/24/09 (0)
- Actually if you pay attention - navman 13:59:34 03/20/09 (11)
- Oxymoron alert: There is no such thing as an "SACD troll" on the Hi-Rez Highway. - Teresa 17:55:37 03/20/09 (10)
- RE: haha - navman 19:59:38 03/20/09 (9)
- It is true that SACD isn't the only Hi-Rez but the Hi-Rez Highway is ONLY for SACDs after the divide. - Teresa 01:09:13 03/21/09 (8)
- RE: Since you are so fond of repeating yourself, let me indulge too........ - navman 13:50:10 03/23/09 (7)
- You still do not understand! The ONLY Hi-Rez on the Hi-Rez Highway is SACD! - Teresa 16:28:06 03/23/09 (6)
- RE: LOL - navman 19:12:41 03/23/09 (5)
- Mr. Troll everything you said untrue of course! - Teresa 03:22:27 03/24/09 (4)
- Teresa, you need to take on another issue, why are we limited to 2.8MKz SACD the standard needs to be changed - TommyTunes 06:30:34 03/24/09 (2)
- I was a champion of "Super DVD" which used 5.6MKz DSD - Teresa 15:39:25 03/24/09 (0)
- RE: +1 - navman 08:09:40 03/24/09 (0)
- RE: Ms. Troll everything you said untrue of course! - navman 04:41:22 03/24/09 (0)