...................... to why cables can change the sound in various combinations and configurations with different amplifiers, from a man that has been designing and building amplifiers for over 25 years (cable naysayers should look away now as none of this is going to change their minds anyway);
[quote="Mike Creek"]You may wonder how I can measure the distortion contribution of wire? Well, I simply drive a sine wave signal into a resistive dummy load with an amplifier (any amplifier). I then measure the difference from one end of the cable to the other. In other words I am not measuring the amplifier's distortion, but the contribution of the cable. This technique was introduced to me by Creek's former chief engineer, Alex Nikitin, who had no particular axe to grind but wanted to debunk the many cable related myths that existed and find the source of missing musical information. We applied those findings to our choice of interconnects and believe it or not, power cords, which we tested in large numbers to find a suitable make/type to supply with our equipment at the time.
Interestingly, solid wire has much lower distortion than flexible wire at all frequencies. Needless to say, with all cables, there are many other factors that affect sound quality. Not the least is the effect of capacitance, (proximity of conductors to each other) and inductance. These 'components' in the system critically affect how the amplifier will work into a given load (loudspeaker) that is outside the control of the designer of the individual equipment.
So, I prefer to use the simplest cables, as they present the least inductance and capacitance. Resistance is not so important, but should be kept within reason. Shielding is sometimes an issue, depending on the environment surrounding the system in use, but the lack of shielding helps to reduce the capacitance that would otherwise create an unwanted filter in the circuit to the speaker and together with inductance caused by winding a cables or just inherent in flexible wire, causes a phase change to the amplifier's feedback circuitry, that could under extreme circumstances create instability that will at the very least make for poor sonic performance and in the worst case break the amplifier.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Regards
Mike Creek[/quote]
In discovering and reading Mr. Creek's theory, I did some quick measurements in my shop using a Sound Technology ST1700A distortion analyser (SigGen output at 1kHz), Dale/Vishay 8 0hm precision dummy load, and an old Bryston 2B power amplifier which is part of an audio test rig. The test itself is very simple, and I could probably teach just about anybody¹ how to do it and how to interpret the findings. I tested various cables that I had around, power cords, speaker cables, interconnects, and just for fun, test leads, scope probe leads, various other test equipment "patch" cables, and some scrap wire from the bin. Well, Mr. Creek is not wrong. Each of the "samples" measured contributed different amounts of added distortion. Some were negligible trace measurements, some were astonishing in that the wire's contribution was as much as 3 times the base distortion level of the Bryston. There seems to be no real pattern to the results at this time, based on my afternoon of messing around, however, Mr. Creek is correct about solid core wire having a lower distortion contribution than stranded wire as the solid core samples I tested exhibited the lowest numbers. One thing is for sure, regardless that some people believe that all cables sound the same, they certainly don't measure the same, and this is demonstrable. At some point I will set some time aside to study this further and attempt to put some sort of a matrix together.
In the meantime, I came away from this with some thoughts;
Even if a particular amplifier has a superb (ie: low) THD spec from its manufacturer, this spec can be made worse (but not better) by adding the requisite cables necessary to make it work. An amplifier with no captive cables requires a minimum of 1 pair of interconnects at its input, one set of speaker cables at its output, and 1 power cable in order to have it operate and make sound. Each of the 3 cable sets can add its own distortion contribution to the system, and the aggregate contribution can far exceed the amplifier's rated THD which it is now added to. Can this have an effect on the sound?
Apart from solid core exhibiting lower distortion numbers than stranded, no other conclusions can be drawn at this time relative to cost/performance within the context of this test. Distortion measurements of quality spendy wire was all over the place, as it was for cheaper examples. No construction model was consistently better than other construction models.
No conclusions can be made as to which cable will offer the best sound in a given position in a particular system. Will the highest distortion example sound better than the lowest distortion one, can't say. On what day in what city with which system with whose ears?
So what's the conclusion? Distortion matters, otherwise designers wouldn't attempt to reduce or eliminate it. Distortion is measurable, full stop. Distortion is not only relevant in audio equipment. Every electronic measurement device I own has noise and distortion specs and adjustment controls to re-calibrate to spec if need be, and most of these devices have nothing to do with measuring audio. Keeping the distortion level as low as possible makes sense, as a lack thereof would eliminate it as a target of blame. If you had a medical condition that your doctor knew could be blamed on the existence of a particular substance in your blood, and a blood test confirmed that the substance in question didn't exist in your blood, then more tests would have to be performed. On the flip side, if you change a cable in your system and hear a [i]difference[/i], have you by chance changed the total system distortion by substituting a cable with a higher distortion contribution for one with a lower distortion contribution, or vice-versa. Does the [i]difference[/i] you hear sound better to you one way vs the other?
More on this as I find the time to do some more tests and interpret the results.
One more thing. I checked the Creek website and confirmed that they do not manufacture and/or sell cables, so Mr. Creek's theory is not in support of a product he is pushing. In fact, I believe that he has laid bare one of the problems that he and all other audio designers have to live with, which is, that one of his products can be rendered substandard by something that is out of his control, the end-users choice of cables.
¹Just [i]about[/i] anybody (subject to the confirmation of an open mind) .
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Topic - Here's a clue............ - yaukui 12:47:59 03/20/08 (120)
- You better teach Bruno P{utzeys how to measure cables.. - cheap-Jack 09:35:47 03/24/08 (4)
- Testing hearing and cables. Was: You better teach Bruno Putzeys how to measure cables. - Ernst Raedecker 13:07:54 03/30/08 (3)
- Retroactive facts - AJinFLA 17:16:09 04/01/08 (0)
- I agree except a few points.. - cheap-Jack 11:15:44 03/31/08 (0)
- RE: Testing hearing and cables. Was: You better teach Bruno Putzeys how to measure cables. - rick_m 17:27:31 03/30/08 (0)
- here's a better clue -- no one can demonstrate to witnesses he can hear any difference except SPL - Richard BassNut Greene 07:53:32 03/21/08 (33)
- Sadly RBG "Claims" No One Can Demonstrate To Witnesses He Can Hear Any Difference Except SPL, Yet... - thetubeguy1954 12:49:41 03/21/08 (20)
- "Nothing else matters to RBG except being correct." Ironic, isn't it? Because he's so often wrong! nt - clarkjohnsen 09:42:45 03/22/08 (9)
- Audio knowledge should be based on objective data, not on your childish character attacks - Richard BassNut Greene 07:22:47 03/24/08 (8)
- Audio knowledge should be based on good observations and theory explaining these observations. But... - Norm 07:44:33 03/24/08 (7)
- "Audio knowledge should be based on *good* observations"...Excellent advice Norman!! - AJinFLA 18:50:19 03/24/08 (3)
- Thank you I knew that at the root of discussions you had an appreciation that obs. are fundamental. - Norm 14:18:08 03/28/08 (0)
- Except of course - E-Stat 17:25:16 03/26/08 (1)
- It's one tool in the toolbox - AJinFLA 18:00:42 04/02/08 (0)
- people listen to a component playing louder than another and then claim it sounds better? - Richard BassNut Greene 08:51:01 03/24/08 (2)
- Yo BassTrap: call me Amish... - robert young 15:50:14 03/26/08 (1)
- Not only that, but - E-Stat 05:39:01 03/31/08 (0)
- "if RBG comes to florida everything will change." .... "so you'd think anyone with 1/2 a brain would realise " - Richard BassNut Greene 13:19:15 03/21/08 (9)
- RBG States SBTs Are Valid But Denies They're A REAL Blind Test If The Results Don't Support His Audio Beliefs. - thetubeguy1954 09:28:30 03/24/08 (8)
- My psychiatrist has instructed me to read every third word in your diatribes, er posts, & respond with respect - Richard BassNut Greene 10:04:00 03/24/08 (7)
- At Least You Admit You Need A Psychiatrist - thetubeguy1954 12:58:17 03/24/08 (6)
- I have edited your post to eliminate all non-audio comments - Richard BassNut Greene 08:55:55 03/25/08 (0)
- I can admit it as well - kerr 13:35:37 03/24/08 (4)
- Stop being so funny - Richard BassNut Greene 08:58:37 03/25/08 (1)
- Until Mrs BassNut decides to join our merry band of PHP nutcases... - kerr 10:15:43 03/25/08 (0)
- BRAVO! (nt) - thetubeguy1954 05:53:51 03/25/08 (1)
- Yeah you just LOVE IT when someone else insults me! - Richard BassNut Greene 08:18:18 03/26/08 (0)
- "No one has ever been able to prove to witnesses" You don't even expect that of what you buy. nt - Norm 11:20:11 03/21/08 (0)
- It wa only a matter of time: RBNG posts the same thing for the 723rd time! (nt) - robert young 10:42:39 03/21/08 (10)
- And you've read it for the 723rd time, complained 723 times & refuted nothing!...So I know for sure your "nt" means.. - Richard BassNut Greene 11:51:52 03/21/08 (4)
- That was weak, RG. - robert young 14:46:29 03/24/08 (3)
- 395 - Richard BassNut Greene 09:01:42 03/25/08 (2)
- You must be nearly spherical by now. You are.... - robert young 09:13:50 03/25/08 (1)
- I give up! - kerr 10:19:13 03/25/08 (0)
- LOL! The "anti-audiophile" Mr. Nut strikes once again...(nt) - mkuller 10:57:26 03/21/08 (4)
- Pro-reality does not mean "anti-audiophile", Mr. Fantasyland audiophile! - Richard BassNut Greene 11:53:58 03/21/08 (0)
- And since DBTs "Don't Work" proof is sidestepped once again! ha ha. (nt) - Presto 11:01:52 03/21/08 (2)
- Yeah hiding the brand name really throws off the hearing ability of those pesky golden ears! - Richard BassNut Greene 11:55:59 03/21/08 (1)
- What methodology did you call upon... - Wellfed 21:25:55 03/25/08 (0)
- Please distribute one to each Oubjectivist around here - thetubeguy1954 06:12:06 03/21/08 (0)
- RE: Here's a clue............Be careful - chris_w 17:10:20 03/20/08 (0)
- This not a clue, this is reality. - Dan Banquer 16:36:48 03/20/08 (37)
- RE: This not a clue, this is reality. - Steve Eddy 10:03:32 03/21/08 (0)
- RE: This not a clue, this is reality. - gymwear5@hotmail.com 21:43:13 03/20/08 (35)
- RE: This not a clue, this is reality. - Steve Eddy 10:06:09 03/21/08 (32)
- RE: This not a clue, this is reality. - gymwear5@hotmail.com 07:01:52 03/24/08 (31)
- Q: - jneutron 07:55:29 03/24/08 (30)
- Another Q: - AJinFLA 15:38:06 03/24/08 (21)
- Found a candidate. - jneutron 05:57:35 03/25/08 (20)
- For president? - AJinFLA 18:16:47 03/25/08 (1)
- RE: For president? - jneutron 18:35:46 03/25/08 (0)
- RE: Found a candidate. - morricab 08:56:06 03/25/08 (17)
- RE: Found a candidate. - jneutron 10:13:31 03/25/08 (16)
- RE: Interconnects - rick_m 07:58:49 03/26/08 (3)
- RE: Interconnects - jneutron 09:45:29 03/26/08 (2)
- RE: Interconnects - rick_m 13:43:55 03/26/08 (1)
- RE: Interconnects - jneutron 13:51:33 03/26/08 (0)
- RE: Found a candidate. - morricab 01:51:03 03/26/08 (11)
- RE: Found a candidate. - jneutron 09:37:00 03/26/08 (10)
- Why bother listening... - rick_m 23:57:27 03/30/08 (9)
- Neat. - jneutron 06:40:21 04/01/08 (6)
- RE: Neat. - rick_m 10:15:23 04/01/08 (5)
- Excellent. - jneutron 12:29:39 04/01/08 (4)
- RE: Excellent. - rick_m 14:29:54 04/01/08 (3)
- RE: Excellent. - jneutron 07:55:18 04/02/08 (2)
- RE: Excellent. - rick_m 10:00:24 04/02/08 (1)
- RE: Excellent. - jneutron 12:36:45 04/02/08 (0)
- RE: Why bother listening... - morricab 04:36:12 03/31/08 (1)
- RE: Why bother listening... - rick_m 08:33:04 03/31/08 (0)
- RE: Q: - gymwear5@hotmail.com 08:41:28 03/24/08 (7)
- RE: Q: - jneutron 09:07:08 03/24/08 (6)
- RE: Q: - gymwear5@hotmail.com 11:14:55 03/24/08 (5)
- RE: Q: - jneutron 12:15:18 03/24/08 (4)
- RE: Q: - gymwear5@hotmail.com 12:43:41 03/24/08 (3)
- RE: Q: - jneutron 09:51:40 03/25/08 (2)
- RE: Q: long.... - gymwear5@hotmail.com 11:14:12 03/25/08 (1)
- RE: Q: long.... - jneutron 12:21:14 03/25/08 (0)
- Interesting....... - Todd Krieger 23:16:29 03/20/08 (1)
- RE: Interesting....... - gymwear5@hotmail.com 07:28:45 03/24/08 (0)
- RE: Here's a clue............ - andy_c 14:01:03 03/20/08 (39)
- Teach me! - Don T 14:42:22 03/20/08 (38)
- RE: Teach me! - andy_c 15:55:39 03/20/08 (37)
- RE: Teach me! - Don T 22:01:20 03/20/08 (0)
- In any event there is still the - bjh 19:46:42 03/20/08 (35)
- Non-linear distortion is not a matter of PH BS - Tony Lauck 09:57:21 03/21/08 (27)
- "A clear definition of distortion is necessary." Exactly what I was going to say! - clarkjohnsen 09:55:11 03/22/08 (16)
- RE: "A clear definition of distortion is necessary." Exactly what I was going to say! - andy_c 10:01:16 03/22/08 (15)
- Beats me, how those guys think they're adding anything to audio knowledge. THD+N indeed! nt - clarkjohnsen 11:06:44 03/22/08 (2)
- THD+N sucks... - andy_c 11:13:31 03/22/08 (1)
- Primitive, really... but look how some will sop it up. nt - clarkjohnsen 11:15:58 03/22/08 (0)
- RE: RMS detector... - rick_m 10:11:06 03/22/08 (11)
- RE: RMS detector... - andy_c 10:37:07 03/22/08 (10)
- You're right. Ironic, isn't it? - rick_m 10:55:54 03/22/08 (9)
- Okay, I found more info on this... - andy_c 11:07:35 03/22/08 (8)
- RE: Have fun... - rick_m 11:32:45 03/22/08 (7)
- FFT Analyzers are the way to go... - gymwear5@hotmail.com 07:12:40 03/25/08 (6)
- You bet! - rick_m 09:34:43 03/25/08 (0)
- RE: FFT Analyzers are the way to go... - morricab 09:07:19 03/25/08 (4)
- RE: FFT Analyzers are the way to go... - gymwear5@hotmail.com 12:31:22 03/25/08 (3)
- RE: FFT Analyzers are the way to go... - morricab 02:03:56 03/26/08 (2)
- RE: FFT Analyzers are the way to go... - gymwear5@hotmail.com 07:50:46 03/26/08 (1)
- RE: FFT Analyzers are the way to go... - morricab 01:11:52 03/27/08 (0)
- Look... - bjh 18:17:19 03/21/08 (9)
- RE: Look... - Don T 08:53:44 03/22/08 (2)
- RE: Look... - andy_c 09:52:40 03/22/08 (1)
- look - Don T 07:31:38 03/24/08 (0)
- RE: Look... - Tony Lauck 19:15:51 03/21/08 (5)
- Really? - bjh 19:23:39 03/21/08 (4)
- RE: Really? - Tony Lauck 19:43:55 03/21/08 (3)
- I have a tape (15ips) of the Mahler First where his mistake makes more sense than the composer's own notes! nt - clarkjohnsen 09:49:35 03/22/08 (1)
- RE: I have a tape (15ips) of the Mahler First where his mistake makes more sense than the composer's own notes - Todd Krieger 08:54:14 03/23/08 (0)
- RE: Really? - Dan Banquer 07:25:21 03/22/08 (0)
- RE: In any event there is still the - andy_c 08:45:38 03/21/08 (6)
- Distortion... - rick_m 23:00:31 03/22/08 (5)
- RE: Distortion... - andy_c 09:45:23 03/23/08 (1)
- RE: Distortion... - rick_m 10:53:50 03/23/08 (0)
- RE: Distortion... - Tony Lauck 07:02:21 03/23/08 (2)
- RE: Distortion... - rick_m 10:05:37 03/23/08 (1)
- RE: Distortion... - Tony Lauck 13:52:39 03/23/08 (0)
- It's all about the system - E-Stat 13:42:37 03/20/08 (0)