Follow Ups Full Thread

Topic - What do cd tweaks imply about what better-designed cd would look like? - TomLarson 11:26:05 03/02/07 (50)

• Re: What do cd tweaks imply about what better-designed cd would look like? - Todd Krieger 12:43:15 03/03/07 (0)
• Data discs? - J.Mac 02:46:43 03/03/07 (35)
• Wrong assumption - Charles Hansen 14:57:16 03/03/07 (33)
• Ok, then... - J.Mac 16:39:09 03/03/07 (32)
• Jitter... [nt] - Ted Smith 16:57:32 03/03/07 (31)
• Re: Jitter... [nt] - Charles Hansen 19:07:48 03/03/07 (0)
• Jitter at what point in the chain? - J.Mac 17:49:03 03/03/07 (29)
• Re: Jitter at what point in the chain? - Ted Smith 21:13:44 03/03/07 (28)
• Re: Jitter at what point in the chain? - Charles Hansen 08:12:00 03/04/07 (27)
• Re: Jitter at what point in the chain? - Todd Krieger 12:31:23 03/12/07 (0)
• Re: Jitter at what point in the chain? - Ted Smith 08:31:53 03/04/07 (25)
• Re: Jitter at what point in the chain? - Charles Hansen 10:16:29 03/04/07 (24)
• Re: Jitter at what point in the chain? - Ted Smith 11:53:17 03/04/07 (23)
• Re: Jitter at what point in the chain? - Charles Hansen 12:37:58 03/04/07 (22)
• Re: Jitter at what point in the chain? - Ted Smith 12:42:49 03/04/07 (21)
• We are not connecting here - Charles Hansen 15:41:44 03/04/07 (9)
• Re: We are not connecting here - Ted Smith 16:06:11 03/04/07 (8)
• Re: We are not connecting here - Charles Hansen 16:50:26 03/04/07 (6)
• Secret Jitter Path - John Swenson 17:25:20 03/05/07 (0)
• Re: We are not connecting here - Ted Smith 17:03:28 03/04/07 (4)
• Re: We are not connecting here - Charles Hansen 18:56:57 03/04/07 (3)
• Re: We are not connecting here - Ted Smith 19:43:51 03/04/07 (2)
• Re: We are not connecting here - Charles Hansen 21:15:11 03/04/07 (1)
• Re: We are not connecting here - Ted Smith 21:35:44 03/04/07 (0)
• Well spotted! - Christine Tham 16:36:13 03/04/07 (0)
• Logic induced modulation and jitter - Christine Tham 13:34:36 03/04/07 (10)
• Here are some other random jitter related pages - Ted Smith 14:17:46 03/04/07 (7)
• This is not a bad link, and not too technical - Christine Tham 14:20:32 03/04/07 (6)
• Nobody seems to take jitter seriously unless there is math in the paper :) [nt] - Ted Smith 14:31:18 03/04/07 (5)
• A question - Christine Tham 15:01:57 03/04/07 (4)
• Re: A question - Ted Smith 15:10:07 03/04/07 (3)
• Re: A question - Christine Tham 15:26:26 03/04/07 (2)
• Re: A question - Ted Smith 16:13:26 03/04/07 (1)
• Hey, nobody said it was going to be easy - which is why I'm not volunteering to design it :-) (nt) - Christine Tham 16:21:06 03/04/07 (0)
• Yep - Ted Smith 13:48:53 03/04/07 (1)
• Re: Yep - Christine Tham 14:17:23 03/04/07 (0)
• That seems like a good idea!!! nt - TomLarson 08:32:27 03/03/07 (0)
• Re: What do cd tweaks imply about what better-designed cd would look like? - Dawnrazor 22:47:00 03/02/07 (2)
• Re: What do cd tweaks imply about what better-designed cd would look like? - TomLarson 08:36:01 03/03/07 (1)
• Re: What do cd tweaks imply about what better-designed cd would look like? - Dawnrazor 21:27:57 03/03/07 (0)
• Re: What do cd tweaks imply about what better-designed cd would look like? - mrod 15:47:01 03/02/07 (1)
• Re: What do cd tweaks imply about what better-designed cd would look like? - TomLarson 08:33:33 03/03/07 (0)
• Re: What do cd tweaks imply about what better-designed cd would look like? - Ted Smith 12:00:00 03/02/07 (7)
• Re: What do cd tweaks imply about what better-designed cd would look like? - TomLarson 15:00:28 03/02/07 (6)
• Re: What do cd tweaks imply about what better-designed cd would look like? - Ted Smith 15:41:41 03/02/07 (5)
• Re: What do cd tweaks imply about what better-designed cd would look like? - TomLarson 15:55:13 03/02/07 (4)
• Re: What do cd tweaks imply about what better-designed cd would look like? - moray james 16:32:46 03/02/07 (3)
• Re: What do cd tweaks imply about what better-designed cd would look like? - TomLarson 17:12:28 03/02/07 (2)
• Re: What do cd tweaks imply about what better-designed cd would look like? - moray james 13:51:01 03/04/07 (1)
• Re: What do cd tweaks imply about what better-designed cd would look like? - TomLarson 11:02:42 03/05/07 (0)

Follow Ups

• Ok, then... - J.Mac 16:39:09 03/03/07 (32)
• Jitter... [nt] - Ted Smith 16:57:32 03/03/07 (31)
• Re: Jitter... [nt] - Charles Hansen 19:07:48 03/03/07 (0)
• Jitter at what point in the chain? - J.Mac 17:49:03 03/03/07 (29)
• Re: Jitter at what point in the chain? - Ted Smith 21:13:44 03/03/07 (28)
• Re: Jitter at what point in the chain? - Charles Hansen 08:12:00 03/04/07 (27)
• Re: Jitter at what point in the chain? - Todd Krieger 12:31:23 03/12/07 (0)
• Re: Jitter at what point in the chain? - Ted Smith 08:31:53 03/04/07 (25)
• Re: Jitter at what point in the chain? - Charles Hansen 10:16:29 03/04/07 (24)
• Re: Jitter at what point in the chain? - Ted Smith 11:53:17 03/04/07 (23)
• Re: Jitter at what point in the chain? - Charles Hansen 12:37:58 03/04/07 (22)
• Re: Jitter at what point in the chain? - Ted Smith 12:42:49 03/04/07 (21)
• We are not connecting here - Charles Hansen 15:41:44 03/04/07 (9)
• Re: We are not connecting here - Ted Smith 16:06:11 03/04/07 (8)
• Re: We are not connecting here - Charles Hansen 16:50:26 03/04/07 (6)
• Secret Jitter Path - John Swenson 17:25:20 03/05/07 (0)
• Re: We are not connecting here - Ted Smith 17:03:28 03/04/07 (4)
• Re: We are not connecting here - Charles Hansen 18:56:57 03/04/07 (3)
• Re: We are not connecting here - Ted Smith 19:43:51 03/04/07 (2)
• Re: We are not connecting here - Charles Hansen 21:15:11 03/04/07 (1)
• Re: We are not connecting here - Ted Smith 21:35:44 03/04/07 (0)
• Well spotted! - Christine Tham 16:36:13 03/04/07 (0)
• Logic induced modulation and jitter - Christine Tham 13:34:36 03/04/07 (10)
• Here are some other random jitter related pages - Ted Smith 14:17:46 03/04/07 (7)
• This is not a bad link, and not too technical - Christine Tham 14:20:32 03/04/07 (6)
• Nobody seems to take jitter seriously unless there is math in the paper :) [nt] - Ted Smith 14:31:18 03/04/07 (5)
• A question - Christine Tham 15:01:57 03/04/07 (4)
• Re: A question - Ted Smith 15:10:07 03/04/07 (3)
• Re: A question - Christine Tham 15:26:26 03/04/07 (2)
• Re: A question - Ted Smith 16:13:26 03/04/07 (1)
• Hey, nobody said it was going to be easy - which is why I'm not volunteering to design it :-) (nt) - Christine Tham 16:21:06 03/04/07 (0)
• Yep - Ted Smith 13:48:53 03/04/07 (1)
• Re: Yep - Christine Tham 14:17:23 03/04/07 (0)