|
Digital Drive Upsamplers, DACs, jitter, shakes and analogue withdrawals, this is it. |
|
|
|
Digital Drive Upsamplers, DACs, jitter, shakes and analogue withdrawals, this is it. |
|
In Reply to: Data discs? posted by J.Mac on March 3, 2007 at 02:46:43:
<< it would take some real catastrophe to make even a single bit non-recoverable. >>While it is true that CD-ROM data discs have one additional layer of error correction compared to CD-Audio discs, even if they could somehow be used for CD-Audio, it wouldn't help the sonics.
With even the cheapest bog-standard CD players, there are almost *never* any non-recoverable bit errors.
All of this was thoroughly researched in the early '90s when the tweaks first started being used. Check the Stereophile archives online for more information on this.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Wrong assumption - Charles Hansen 14:57:16 03/03/07 (33)
- Ok, then... - J.Mac 16:39:09 03/03/07 (32)
- Jitter... [nt] - Ted Smith 16:57:32 03/03/07 (31)
- Re: Jitter... [nt] - Charles Hansen 19:07:48 03/03/07 (0)
- Jitter at what point in the chain? - J.Mac 17:49:03 03/03/07 (29)
- Re: Jitter at what point in the chain? - Ted Smith 21:13:44 03/03/07 (28)
- Re: Jitter at what point in the chain? - Charles Hansen 08:12:00 03/04/07 (27)
- Re: Jitter at what point in the chain? - Todd Krieger 12:31:23 03/12/07 (0)
- Re: Jitter at what point in the chain? - Ted Smith 08:31:53 03/04/07 (25)
- Re: Jitter at what point in the chain? - Charles Hansen 10:16:29 03/04/07 (24)
- Re: Jitter at what point in the chain? - Ted Smith 11:53:17 03/04/07 (23)
- Re: Jitter at what point in the chain? - Charles Hansen 12:37:58 03/04/07 (22)
- Re: Jitter at what point in the chain? - Ted Smith 12:42:49 03/04/07 (21)
- We are not connecting here - Charles Hansen 15:41:44 03/04/07 (9)
- Re: We are not connecting here - Ted Smith 16:06:11 03/04/07 (8)
- Re: We are not connecting here - Charles Hansen 16:50:26 03/04/07 (6)
- Secret Jitter Path - John Swenson 17:25:20 03/05/07 (0)
- Re: We are not connecting here - Ted Smith 17:03:28 03/04/07 (4)
- Re: We are not connecting here - Charles Hansen 18:56:57 03/04/07 (3)
- Re: We are not connecting here - Ted Smith 19:43:51 03/04/07 (2)
- Re: We are not connecting here - Charles Hansen 21:15:11 03/04/07 (1)
- Re: We are not connecting here - Ted Smith 21:35:44 03/04/07 (0)
- Well spotted! - Christine Tham 16:36:13 03/04/07 (0)
- Logic induced modulation and jitter - Christine Tham 13:34:36 03/04/07 (10)
- Here are some other random jitter related pages - Ted Smith 14:17:46 03/04/07 (7)
- This is not a bad link, and not too technical - Christine Tham 14:20:32 03/04/07 (6)
- Nobody seems to take jitter seriously unless there is math in the paper :) [nt] - Ted Smith 14:31:18 03/04/07 (5)
- A question - Christine Tham 15:01:57 03/04/07 (4)
- Re: A question - Ted Smith 15:10:07 03/04/07 (3)
- Re: A question - Christine Tham 15:26:26 03/04/07 (2)
- Re: A question - Ted Smith 16:13:26 03/04/07 (1)
- Hey, nobody said it was going to be easy - which is why I'm not volunteering to design it :-) (nt) - Christine Tham 16:21:06 03/04/07 (0)
- Yep - Ted Smith 13:48:53 03/04/07 (1)
- Re: Yep - Christine Tham 14:17:23 03/04/07 (0)
Top of Page ]
[ Contact Us ]
[ Support/Wish List ]
[ Copyright © 2024, Audio Asylum, all rights reserved ]
