|
Digital Drive Upsamplers, DACs, jitter, shakes and analogue withdrawals, this is it. |
|
|
|
Digital Drive Upsamplers, DACs, jitter, shakes and analogue withdrawals, this is it. |
|
In Reply to: What do cd tweaks imply about what better-designed cd would look like? posted by TomLarson on March 2, 2007 at 11:26:05:
HowdyI think I'd ask a different question. How should a transport be constructed so as to not be so sensitive to these tweaks.
To a first approximation these tweaks all change the jitter and transports which are less jitter sensitive or are feeding DACs which are less jitter sensitive are (in my experience) less less sensitive to these tweaks.
-Ted
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Re: What do cd tweaks imply about what better-designed cd would look like? - Ted Smith 12:00:00 03/02/07 (7)
- Re: What do cd tweaks imply about what better-designed cd would look like? - TomLarson 15:00:28 03/02/07 (6)
- Re: What do cd tweaks imply about what better-designed cd would look like? - Ted Smith 15:41:41 03/02/07 (5)
- Re: What do cd tweaks imply about what better-designed cd would look like? - TomLarson 15:55:13 03/02/07 (4)
- Re: What do cd tweaks imply about what better-designed cd would look like? - moray james 16:32:46 03/02/07 (3)
- Re: What do cd tweaks imply about what better-designed cd would look like? - TomLarson 17:12:28 03/02/07 (2)
- Re: What do cd tweaks imply about what better-designed cd would look like? - moray james 13:51:01 03/04/07 (1)
- Re: What do cd tweaks imply about what better-designed cd would look like? - TomLarson 11:02:42 03/05/07 (0)
Top of Page ]
[ Contact Us ]
[ Support/Wish List ]
[ Copyright © 2024, Audio Asylum, all rights reserved ]
