In Reply to: Re: IAR Digital Format Article posted by mr_bill on March 9, 2002 at 10:35:35:
Yes, they would be the same comments. I have worked extensively in all the formats. 192 kHz is almost indistiguishable from DSD - very little difference - and certainly nothing like the writer describes. I still give DSD the edge in faithfulness to the source coming from our microphones. What more can one ask?
Best Regards,Michael Bishop
Recording Engineer
Telarc International
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups Full ThreadTopic - IAR Digital Format Article - Bob Wilcox 05:38:17 03/09/02 (93)
- Peter's violin - gkhowell 13:54:56 03/10/02 (0)
- Re: Could this article being erased from internet - Jean-Marie Geijsen 12:55:44 03/10/02 (0)
- Come-on DSD -- why still no technical rebuff for Lipshitz/Vanderkooi? . . . - Martin says 08:25:47 03/10/02 (42)
- Re: Come-on DSD -- why still no technical rebuff for Lipshitz/Vanderkooi? . . . - Davea 18:06:10 03/10/02 (1)
- But Sony don't release hybrid discs - Metralla 21:24:05 03/10/02 (0)
- . . . But they do control the hybrid technology & pressing . . . - Martin says 03:27:54 03/11/02 (0)
- Funny that accusation has been leveled by him...the Redbook layers of hybrid discs are about my best - Methos 10:22:58 03/11/02 (0)
- this issue has been addressed many times - tunenut 09:42:33 03/10/02 (0)
- Says a lot doesn`t it? - chris.redmond2@bushinternet.com 09:30:56 03/10/02 (35)
- P. Moncrief is always very thorough and detailed - porky_pig_jr 02:11:07 03/11/02 (0)
- Re: Says a lot doesn`t it? - waVeman 11:18:09 03/10/02 (33)
- How about square wave performance -- dvda vs sacd. - theob 13:02:35 03/10/02 (18)
- 10khz "square-wave" test? Nonsense! - Martin says 16:26:29 03/10/02 (17)
- Re: 10khz "square-wave" test? Nonsense! - Peter 03:49:43 03/11/02 (0)
- All that test shows is that SACD has a higher frequency response than CD. {n.t.} - Martin says 05:16:37 03/11/02 (0)
- Re: All that test shows is that SACD has a higher frequency response than CD. {n.t.} - Peter 14:29:07 03/11/02 (0)
- Puzzled by this "test" also. - waVeman 20:53:31 03/10/02 (13)
- more whining - tunenut 21:47:41 03/10/02 (12)
- And ANOTHER typical avoidance tactic by DSD believers is rolled out! - waVeman 00:54:28 03/11/02 (11)
- you are right - tunenut 09:38:03 03/11/02 (0)
- See, it wasn't THAT hard, now was it??? N/T - waVeman 16:55:05 03/11/02 (0)
- Re: you are right . . . - Martin says 10:57:39 03/11/02 (0)
- not quite correct - tunenut 11:11:04 03/11/02 (0)
- I wasn't implying that there was a "sample & hold" with DSD . . - Martin says 11:29:53 03/11/02 (0)
- So.................. - waVeman 17:16:40 03/11/02 (3)
- the advantages are implementation issues - tunenut 18:40:41 03/11/02 (2)
- Re: the advantages are implementation issues. . . - Martin says 07:36:52 03/12/02 (1)
- . . . And for those who didn't know, "multibit" DACs use PCM {n.t.} - Martin says 07:44:18 03/12/02 (0)
- agree with you, mostly - tunenut 13:15:14 03/11/02 (0)
- Think of it this way... - Ted Smith 12:35:56 03/11/02 (0)
- I have an even better idea - Jazz Inmate 12:16:29 03/10/02 (12)
- Re: Recording heritage of Weather Report disc? - kotches 11:19:03 03/11/02 (0)
- Re: Recording heritage of Weather Report disc? - Michael Bishop 08:05:42 03/12/02 (2)
- Telarc Weather Report disc = A Winner on SACD! - bmoura 21:37:47 03/13/02 (0)
- One takeaway for me is that there is hope for dvda ... - theob 16:59:23 03/12/02 (0)
- Are there any SACD/DVD-A titles taken from the same analogue master? [nt] - chris.redmond2@bushinternet.com 15:15:38 03/11/02 (0)
- But a very poor conclusion . .... - ZS KEKL 19:12:56 03/10/02 (0)
- Re: I have an even better idea - chris.redmond2@bushinternet.com 13:05:02 03/10/02 (3)
- Re: I have an even better idea - kotches 11:32:59 03/11/02 (0)
- Re: I have an even better idea - chris.redmond2@bushinternet.com 15:25:02 03/11/02 (0)
- $5,000 JVC XV-D9000 dvd-audio player - waVeman 14:41:54 03/10/02 (2)
- Forget Naz vs Berrera 2, lets get it on with JVC vs Marantz SA-1! :0) [nt] - chris.redmond2@bushinternet.com 14:51:22 03/10/02 (1)
- Re: Forget Naz vs Berrera 2, lets get it on with JVC vs Marantz SA-1! :0) [nt] - waVeman 15:36:54 03/10/02 (0)
- Re: Says a lot doesn`t it? - chris.redmond2@bushinternet.com 11:53:37 03/10/02 (0)
- Please ignore for this duplicate post -- my browser did an accidental refresh! {n.t.} - Martin says 08:28:44 03/10/02 (0)
- N-degree iterative testing would yield more interesting results - Nicholas Fulford 06:17:41 03/10/02 (0)
- Come-on DSD -- why still no technical rebuff for Lipshitz/Vanderkooi? . . . - Martin says 04:05:29 03/10/02 (3)
- Re: There are many tech papers at AES! - Michael Bishop 05:49:04 03/10/02 (2)
- I have done my research -- do you mean these:- - Martin says 08:34:31 03/10/02 (0)
- Re: has Ed Meitner authored any papers........? - High-end Dreamer 06:38:01 03/10/02 (0)
- Re: IAR Digital Format Article - Dan Stenning 19:45:49 03/09/02 (0)
- "the lady doth protest too much" - Joel_Waterman 13:30:27 03/09/02 (5)
- And as Joseph Pulitzer observed... - Jim Treanor 16:30:37 03/09/02 (0)
- Re: "the lady doth protest too much" - waVeman 13:43:12 03/09/02 (3)
- not sure of your point... - tunenut 15:57:24 03/09/02 (0)
- It's like separating music from white noise :-) - Joel_Waterman 14:03:17 03/09/02 (1)
- Nicely put. Thanks (nt) - Metralla 19:37:46 03/09/02 (0)
- Thats it! I am selling all my SACDs and player 'cause of IAR! <nt> - Weather_B 12:30:05 03/09/02 (0)
- Re: This one lost credibility with - Michael Bishop 12:17:29 03/09/02 (13)
- Question - waVeman 22:27:08 03/09/02 (7)
- Re: Question - Michael Bishop 16:59:21 03/10/02 (3)
- Thank you - waVeman 01:10:04 03/11/02 (0)
- Nobody 'hates' PCM...scsid MCP ylohnu sih raeh ot lleh ni mih nioj lliw I ro natas morf em evas!!! - Methos 20:36:01 03/11/02 (0)
- Thks Michael! - TheNewOrder 19:20:32 03/10/02 (0)
- Re: Dear Watson... - Patrick UITZ 03:13:30 03/10/02 (1)
- Positive wa V e. nt - Patrick UITZ 08:08:02 03/11/02 (0)
- I really hope so Pat. N/T - waVeman 15:42:22 03/10/02 (0)
- Not new subject. - SimonTJU 16:27:41 03/09/02 (2)
- Second that - Joel_Waterman 00:43:22 03/10/02 (0)
- Re: Second that, me to - Peter 03:57:11 03/11/02 (0)
- Simon that has been my experience too. Just the opposite of Moncrief's ridiculous assertions. nt - theob 16:54:16 03/09/02 (0)
- Thanks to an insider who can repudiate the rubbish that Moncrief is alleging. nt - theob 13:42:17 03/09/02 (0)
- Re: IAR Digital Format Article - mr_bill 10:35:35 03/09/02 (4)
- Re: YES - Michael Bishop 12:21:35 03/09/02 (0)
- Re: IAR Digital Format Article - theob 12:02:20 03/09/02 (2)
- J Peter Moncrief.- was he ever "mighty" ? - Metralla 19:46:21 03/09/02 (1)
- Re: J Peter Moncrief.- was he ever "mighty" ? - theob 04:54:16 03/10/02 (0)
- fundatmental errors - tunenut 10:26:02 03/09/02 (0)
- 6 bits of resolution...?! And lower-end audiophiles fooled into this? - DVDAphile 09:28:29 03/09/02 (0)
- This nonsense happens when you do not have a bypass test - Ole Lund Christensen 08:32:40 03/09/02 (0)
- Well there you have it. DSD is the worst thing that has been ... - theob 07:37:02 03/09/02 (0)
- Here's a few typical quotes: - Ted Smith 07:36:15 03/09/02 (1)
- Re: Here's a few typical quotes: - Skeptic 08:35:45 03/09/02 (0)
- An overkill of an article! beside the fact that the writer has some kind of paranoia... - patrickU 05:59:57 03/09/02 (8)
- Re: An overkill of an article! beside the fact that the writer has some kind of paranoia... - chris.redmond2@bushinternet.com 09:07:12 03/10/02 (3)
- Re: An overkill of an article! beside the fact that the writer has some kind of paranoia... - Patrick UITZ 10:49:32 03/10/02 (2)
- Re: An overkill of an article! beside the fact that the writer has some kind of paranoia... - chris.redmond2@bushinternet.com 12:05:09 03/10/02 (1)
- Re: An overkill of an article! beside the fact that the writer has some kind of paranoia... - Patrick UITZ 12:12:24 03/10/02 (0)
- J. Peter Cottonears strikes again <nt> - Nicholas Fulford 07:59:13 03/10/02 (3)
- HP called him that too! <nt> - theob 08:11:50 03/10/02 (2)
- So did TELARC , too... - Patrick UITZ 10:51:44 03/10/02 (1)
- Re: So did TELARC , too... - theob 13:05:39 03/10/02 (0)
- Re: So did TELARC , too... - Patrick UITZ 05:06:29 03/11/02 (0)
Follow Ups
- Re: YES - Michael Bishop 12:21:35 03/09/02 (0)