In Reply to: RE: 5 microseconds? -- Try 3 milliseconds for bass frequencies posted by tomservo on July 27, 2009 at 15:40:27:
"Well if you look at the definition, it references a periodic event like a sine wave or signal."
Yes you are certainly right about that which had me scratching my head until rmembering the whole thing about fourier transforms and Laplace. Nice little review I had there of stuff which might be argued I really had no business forgetting in the first place. I guess I could try and make excuses but what's the use...wrong is wrong.
Next time I might hesitate a moment longer before inserting my foot into my mouth.
"In a system which has a Q,"
You mean like any real world reactive system will? (Somehow I feel like I'm only making your argument stronger and mine weaker.)
"The example of a 5 or 6 cycle Gaussian envelope sine wave, was originally suggested by Don Keele, if one made the envelope shorter, the bandwidth it occupies increases past 1/3 octave."
Presumably to work well with recorded music?
"In recording my self, i find the difference between 24/96 and CD format to be audible, not a show stopper, not audible with most things except environmental noises."
This is interesting. It almost seems as if the difference between average and peak levels may point to the necessary Gaussian envelope to obtain realism. Would you agree?
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- RE: 5 microseconds? -- Try 3 milliseconds for bass frequencies - Ugly 18:05:37 07/27/09 (5)
- RE: 5 microseconds? -- Try 3 milliseconds for bass frequencies - tomservo 08:58:50 07/28/09 (1)
- RE: 5 microseconds? -- Try 3 milliseconds for bass frequencies - Ugly 21:33:50 07/28/09 (0)
- You are to be highly commended - E-Stat 18:28:26 07/27/09 (2)
- RE: You are to be highly commended - Ugly 19:33:32 07/27/09 (1)
- Sure it is - E-Stat 05:57:40 07/28/09 (0)