In Reply to: I'll speak for myself, Pat. posted by clifff on March 13, 2007 at 07:48:31:
That's pretty much the way I saw it and I was there, watching it "live" thoughout the whole ordeal, even the threads that got deleted. It was one of those "watching a train wreck" sort of things.I think the bottom line is that they got tired and frustrated with Wellfed's demands and prerequisites and then realised he was not going to play by their rules (it's their money). That's when the whole thing fell apart and the back and forth between the two personalities got started. There were apparently alot of crossed communications and I don't think that breakdown helped things either.
I'm not defending Kramer either as he did come across as rather an ass but I can imagine his frustration after the overwhelmingly long period of time all this occured.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Re: I'll speak for myself, Pat. - Ken Perkins 10:26:47 03/13/07 (13)
- What were the JREF rules I was unwilling to abide by?... - Wellfed 11:41:03 03/13/07 (5)
- Simple - Ken Perkins 13:21:30 03/13/07 (3)
- That is simple... - Wellfed 13:34:10 03/13/07 (2)
- Re: That is simple... - Ken Perkins 13:51:10 03/13/07 (1)
- The test didn't fall apart because Kramer was unwilling or unable to negotiate in good faith?... - Wellfed 14:50:43 03/13/07 (0)
- That's a pretty fair summary, from my watchful POV. nt - clarkjohnsen 12:10:21 03/13/07 (0)
- A good summary - clifff 10:42:09 03/13/07 (6)
- Plenty more, actually... - Wellfed 11:12:57 03/13/07 (5)
- Wellfed, by the time this "lie" was uttered - clifff 11:34:26 03/13/07 (4)
- My ego is secure Cliff... - Wellfed 12:13:45 03/13/07 (3)
- It must be comforting to feel so righteous. nt - clifff 13:08:20 03/13/07 (1)
- It is comforting to BE so righteous... - Wellfed 13:29:48 03/13/07 (0)
- "Kramer's call for me to have my back to the system." Might just as well... - clarkjohnsen 12:39:54 03/13/07 (0)