Sorry, that was an inside joke between my good friend and neighbor TG54 and I - AJinFLA

Follow Ups Full Thread

Topic - In lay terms, can someone explain how............. - mr grits 11:03:05 03/04/07 (134)

Transistor/tube amps are not linear, inject noise to the signal, have imperfect gain bandwidth's the list goes on.... - Ugly 09:39:40 03/06/07 (10)

Are you implying better go passive as much as possible? (nt) - cheap-Jack 13:25:57 03/07/07 (9)

Re: Are you implying better go passive as much as possible? (nt) - morricab 01:17:40 03/08/07 (4)

Yes, less can deliver more. - cheap-Jack 09:18:53 03/08/07 (3)

Re: Yes, less can deliver more. - morricab 15:33:58 03/08/07 (2)

Good sound from FETs-driving-tubes powestage? - cheap-Jack 08:53:52 03/09/07 (1)

Re: Good sound from FETs-driving-tubes powestage? - morricab 17:38:21 03/09/07 (0)

Not necessarily, rather just that whatever the chosen (state of the art?) methods are imperfect.. - Ugly 16:32:14 03/07/07 (3)

Yes, passive is a better way to go, IMO. - cheap-Jack 08:33:15 03/08/07 (2)

Passive gain stages a better way than active????? maybe if a useful version of passive gain stage actually existed... - Ugly 18:17:58 03/08/07 (1)

You jumped overboard, bud. - cheap-Jack 08:26:03 03/09/07 (0)

Re: In lay terms, can someone explain how............. - Todd Krieger 00:03:21 03/05/07 (0)

The elephant in the room... - Al Sekela 20:07:10 03/04/07 (3)

Re: The elephant in the room... - AJinFLA 09:52:58 03/05/07 (2)

The amps I'm using have linear supplies. - Al Sekela 17:28:17 03/05/07 (1)

Re: The amps I'm using have linear supplies. - AJinFLA 20:16:18 03/05/07 (0)

Re: In lay terms, can someone explain how............. - john curl 15:14:48 03/04/07 (1)

Thanks, but I can't pretend to comprehend............. * - mr grits 16:50:09 03/04/07 (0)

Chip Amp voicing is dominated by - AJinFLA 12:19:05 03/04/07 (115)

Chip Amp Voicing Is Definitely Dominated By POLLYinFLA's Disastrous Decision! - thetubeguy1954 07:52:06 03/05/07 (111)

Tommy Boy, I found some other reviews of that DSP8024 you seem fascinated with - AJinFLA 16:05:18 03/06/07 (5)

POLLY Boy Read What I Actually Said, Not What You Want It To Mean! - thetubeguy1954 09:14:30 03/07/07 (4)

Jeez, another long one - AJinFLA 16:08:03 03/07/07 (3)

Why They're Long! - thetubeguy1954 07:03:44 03/08/07 (0)

I stopped reading his posts long ago nt - clifff 00:51:04 03/08/07 (1)

Thanks! - thetubeguy1954 07:05:23 03/08/07 (0)

Hi Tom :-) - AJinFLA 20:04:53 03/05/07 (40)

Hello POLLYinFLA - thetubeguy1954 13:56:08 03/06/07 (1)

Whew! I almost ran out of gas reading that one. Thanks for the reply Tom. Enjoyable reading.(nt) - AJinFLA 15:54:00 03/06/07 (0)

Re: Hi Tom :-) - Tre' 09:00:40 03/06/07 (37)

Re: Hi Tom :-) - AJinFLA 09:25:56 03/06/07 (36)

Re: Hi Tom :-) - kerr 04:42:18 03/07/07 (5)

Re: Hi Tom :-) - AJinFLA 16:14:25 03/07/07 (3)

Re: Hi Tom :-) - kerr 17:14:54 03/07/07 (2)

Re: Hi Tom :-) - AJinFLA 17:57:09 03/07/07 (1)

Re: Hi Tom :-) - kerr 04:15:05 03/08/07 (0)

LOL! - E-Stat 07:32:01 03/07/07 (0)

What the hell are you talking about? - Tre' 14:16:53 03/06/07 (29)

Sorry, that was an inside joke between my good friend and neighbor TG54 and I - AJinFLA 16:13:34 03/06/07 (28)

More Putrid Parroting From King POLLYinFLA - thetubeguy1954 09:37:39 03/07/07 (2)

So TG54 - AJinFLA 16:11:44 03/07/07 (1)

So POLLYinFLA - thetubeguy1954 07:43:56 03/08/07 (0)

Re: Sorry, that was an inside joke between my good friend and neighbor TG54 and I - Tre' 17:21:30 03/06/07 (24)

Re: Sorry, that was an inside joke between my good friend and neighbor TG54 and I - kerr 04:39:46 03/07/07 (23)

Sorry, That Was Another Pathetic Attempt At A Joke By POLLYinFLA - thetubeguy1954 10:53:03 03/07/07 (5)

Re: Sorry, That Was Another Pathetic Attempt At A Joke By POLLYinFLA - kerr 17:25:49 03/07/07 (4)

Re: Sorry, That Was Another Pathetic Attempt At A Joke By POLLYinFLA - thetubeguy1954 08:59:08 03/08/07 (3)

If you left off the 1954 part, that was MY name in the late '70's - kerr 09:36:52 03/08/07 (0)

Kerr, can you imagine how much cooler Tom would be if his name was thedubeguy1954? (nt) - AJinFLA 09:28:08 03/08/07 (1)

Ima Dumass - I replied to Tom above instead of you (nt) - kerr 09:37:59 03/08/07 (0)

Re: Sorry, that was an inside joke between my good friend and neighbor TG54 and I - Tre' 08:21:39 03/07/07 (13)

Re: Sorry, that was an inside joke between my good friend and neighbor TG54 and I - kerr 09:14:16 03/07/07 (12)

Re: Sorry, that was an inside joke between my good friend and neighbor TG54 and I - theaudiohobby 09:36:01 03/07/07 (10)

Re: Sorry, that was an inside joke between my good friend and neighbor TG54 and I - Tre' 12:00:12 03/07/07 (9)

Re: Sorry, that was an inside joke between my good friend and neighbor TG54 and I - theaudiohobby 14:33:23 03/07/07 (8)

Re: Sorry, that was an inside joke between my good friend and neighbor TG54 and I - Tre' 14:40:28 03/07/07 (7)

Re: Sorry, that was an inside joke between my good friend and neighbor TG54 and I - AJinFLA 18:33:19 03/07/07 (6)

Re: Sorry, that was an inside joke between my good friend and neighbor TG54 and I - Tre' 21:09:54 03/07/07 (5)

Re: Sorry, that was an inside joke between my good friend and neighbor TG54 and I - AJinFLA 14:54:27 03/08/07 (4)

Re: Sorry, that was an inside joke between my good friend and neighbor TG54 and I - Tre' 15:50:39 03/08/07 (3)

Re: Sorry, that was an inside joke between my good friend and neighbor TG54 and I - AJinFLA 16:12:45 03/08/07 (2)

Re: Sorry, that was an inside joke between my good friend and neighbor TG54 and I - Tre' 18:58:30 03/08/07 (1)

Or as the article at the top of the page suggests - E-Stat 05:46:55 03/09/07 (0)

I agree. We are on the same page. (nt) - Tre' 09:23:16 03/07/07 (0)

Re: Sorry, that was an inside joke between my good friend and neighbor TG54 and I - theaudiohobby 06:39:44 03/07/07 (2)

Re: Sorry, that was an inside joke between my good friend and neighbor TG54 and I - kerr 07:49:02 03/07/07 (0)

Yes, amplified live music is A much better reference than reproduced. (nt). - cheap-Jack 07:17:57 03/07/07 (0)

Re: Chip Amp Voicing Is Definitely Dominated By POLLYinFLA's Disastrous Decision! - tomservo 18:10:42 03/05/07 (11)

Re: Chip Amp Voicing Is Definitely Dominated By POLLYinFLA's Disastrous Decision! - thetubeguy1954 14:02:07 03/06/07 (8)

Re: Chip Amp Voicing Is Definitely Dominated By POLLYinFLA's Disastrous Decision! - tomservo 14:50:53 03/06/07 (7)

Re: Chip Amp Voicing Is Definitely Dominated By POLLYinFLA's Disastrous Decision! - thetubeguy1954 12:42:27 03/07/07 (6)

Re: Chip Amp Voicing Is Definitely Dominated By POLLYinFLA's Disastrous Decision! - tomservo 17:21:20 03/07/07 (5)

Re: Chip Amp Voicing Is Definitely Dominated By POLLYinFLA's Disastrous Decision! - thetubeguy1954 09:42:13 03/08/07 (4)

Re: Chip Amp Voicing Is Definitely Dominated By POLLYinFLA's Disastrous Decision! - AJinFLA 14:47:25 03/08/07 (3)

Setting The Record Straight - thetubeguy1954 09:32:47 03/09/07 (2)

More threats and now spewing racist bile. You desperately need help outside of this board Tom (nt) - AJinFLA 06:49:13 03/10/07 (1)

You're A Sick Demented Man, Who Cannot Comprehend An Analogy - thetubeguy1954 08:49:49 03/14/07 (0)

Tom, I'm bringing TubeGuy with me to NSCA Expo 2007 - AJinFLA 19:15:06 03/05/07 (0)

He sure is. - GTF 19:04:12 03/05/07 (0)

Re: Chip Amp Voicing Is Definitely Dominated By POLLYinFLA's Disastrous Decision! - theaudiohobby 10:46:52 03/05/07 (51)

Do tell us - E-Stat 17:20:46 03/05/07 (39)

Re: Rather you tell me - theaudiohobby 17:37:20 03/05/07 (38)

You confuse me with someone who finds - E-Stat 19:08:22 03/06/07 (22)

Re: You confuse me with someone who finds - john curl 02:16:27 03/07/07 (0)

Re: Nice try but it is a crock... - theaudiohobby 01:23:44 03/07/07 (20)

Old or not, it remains a perfect example - E-Stat 05:59:12 03/07/07 (19)

Re: Irrelevant and a crock - theaudiohobby 06:27:38 03/07/07 (18)

Because they DON'T WORK - E-Stat 06:44:25 03/07/07 (17)

Dan, are you still puking out there? - E-Stat 07:14:37 03/07/07 (0)

Re: Still a crock - theaudiohobby 07:01:16 03/07/07 (15)

Re: Still a crock - morricab 07:14:11 03/07/07 (0)

Explain then - E-Stat 07:09:36 03/07/07 (13)

Re: A crock - theaudiohobby 08:30:17 03/07/07 (12)

You keep running in circles - E-Stat 09:12:49 03/07/07 (11)

Re: Another crock, another non-sequiter - theaudiohobby 09:32:18 03/07/07 (10)

Ok - E-Stat 09:38:00 03/07/07 (9)

Re: An impasse - theaudiohobby 09:42:39 03/07/07 (8)

Gee.. - E-Stat 09:50:08 03/07/07 (7)

Re: And the crock continues.... - theaudiohobby 10:09:47 03/07/07 (6)

Forget? - E-Stat 10:21:14 03/07/07 (5)

Re: Just another crock - theaudiohobby 14:51:15 03/07/07 (4)

We're talking across each other - E-Stat 16:12:39 03/07/07 (3)

Re: This is getting more ridiculous - theaudiohobby 02:23:11 03/08/07 (2)

I remain talking about the audio quality - E-Stat 05:46:39 03/08/07 (1)

Re: Just another crock - theaudiohobby 07:04:48 03/08/07 (0)

Show us HOW such subjectives are "measurable" .. - cheap-Jack 11:42:21 03/06/07 (13)

Re: They are not subjectives. - theaudiohobby 16:18:39 03/06/07 (12)

I repeat: show us HOW? (nt) - cheap-Jack 08:13:55 03/07/07 (3)

Re: Nice try!!! - theaudiohobby 08:25:48 03/07/07 (2)

Please Explain How These Traits Are Measured! - thetubeguy1954 09:52:39 03/08/07 (0)

I am surely interested in any RELEVANT measurements. - cheap-Jack 09:21:01 03/07/07 (0)

Re: They are not subjectives. - morricab 02:03:47 03/07/07 (7)

Re: They are not subjectives. - theaudiohobby 02:22:03 03/07/07 (6)

Re: They are not subjectives. - morricab 07:05:52 03/07/07 (5)

Re: They are not subjectives. - theaudiohobby 09:09:06 03/07/07 (4)

Re: They are not subjectives. - morricab 09:39:39 03/07/07 (3)

Re: They are not subjectives. - theaudiohobby 10:26:08 03/07/07 (2)

Re: They are not subjectives. - morricab 15:43:01 03/08/07 (0)

RU Serious? - E-Stat 20:40:55 03/07/07 (0)

He can't tell you, but he can B.S. you to death. nt - Dan Banquer 04:35:45 03/06/07 (0)

Re: Chip Amp Voicing Is Definitely Dominated By POLLYinFLA's Disastrous Decision! - thetubeguy1954 13:31:47 03/05/07 (10)

Re: Chip Amp Voicing Is Definitely Dominated By POLLYinFLA's Disastrous Decision! - morricab 02:14:34 03/06/07 (8)

Are you suggesting - AJinFLA 03:39:55 03/06/07 (7)

More Brainless Banter From King POLLYinFLA - thetubeguy1954 11:35:22 03/06/07 (6)

Whoa! What is that contraption? - AJinFLA 16:19:37 03/06/07 (5)

Re: Whoa! What is that contraption? - thetubeguy1954 14:07:51 03/07/07 (4)

No, no, not the measurements - AJinFLA 18:16:54 03/07/07 (3)

Re: No, no, not the measurements - thetubeguy1954 11:32:48 03/08/07 (0)

Re: No, no, not the measurements - theaudiohobby 01:13:05 03/08/07 (1)

??? - kerr 07:57:40 03/08/07 (0)

Re: Chip Amp Voicing Is Definitely Dominated By POLLYinFLA's Disastrous Decision! - theaudiohobby 14:39:14 03/05/07 (0)

Re: Chip Amp voicing is dominated by - Todd Krieger 23:55:03 03/04/07 (0)

Hmmm, in the same listening room I've tried all sort of amps...... - mr grits 16:49:06 03/04/07 (1)

Formally: research. Layly, trial & error. - cheap-Jack 08:37:21 03/05/07 (0)

Follow Ups

Sorry, that was an inside joke between my good friend and neighbor TG54 and I - AJinFLA 16:13:34 03/06/07 (28)

More Putrid Parroting From King POLLYinFLA - thetubeguy1954 09:37:39 03/07/07 (2)

So TG54 - AJinFLA 16:11:44 03/07/07 (1)

So POLLYinFLA - thetubeguy1954 07:43:56 03/08/07 (0)

Re: Sorry, that was an inside joke between my good friend and neighbor TG54 and I - Tre' 17:21:30 03/06/07 (24)

Re: Sorry, that was an inside joke between my good friend and neighbor TG54 and I - kerr 04:39:46 03/07/07 (23)

Sorry, That Was Another Pathetic Attempt At A Joke By POLLYinFLA - thetubeguy1954 10:53:03 03/07/07 (5)

Re: Sorry, That Was Another Pathetic Attempt At A Joke By POLLYinFLA - kerr 17:25:49 03/07/07 (4)

Re: Sorry, That Was Another Pathetic Attempt At A Joke By POLLYinFLA - thetubeguy1954 08:59:08 03/08/07 (3)

If you left off the 1954 part, that was MY name in the late '70's - kerr 09:36:52 03/08/07 (0)

Kerr, can you imagine how much cooler Tom would be if his name was thedubeguy1954? (nt) - AJinFLA 09:28:08 03/08/07 (1)

Ima Dumass - I replied to Tom above instead of you (nt) - kerr 09:37:59 03/08/07 (0)

Re: Sorry, that was an inside joke between my good friend and neighbor TG54 and I - Tre' 08:21:39 03/07/07 (13)

Re: Sorry, that was an inside joke between my good friend and neighbor TG54 and I - kerr 09:14:16 03/07/07 (12)

Re: Sorry, that was an inside joke between my good friend and neighbor TG54 and I - theaudiohobby 09:36:01 03/07/07 (10)

Re: Sorry, that was an inside joke between my good friend and neighbor TG54 and I - Tre' 12:00:12 03/07/07 (9)

Re: Sorry, that was an inside joke between my good friend and neighbor TG54 and I - theaudiohobby 14:33:23 03/07/07 (8)

Re: Sorry, that was an inside joke between my good friend and neighbor TG54 and I - Tre' 14:40:28 03/07/07 (7)

Re: Sorry, that was an inside joke between my good friend and neighbor TG54 and I - AJinFLA 18:33:19 03/07/07 (6)

Re: Sorry, that was an inside joke between my good friend and neighbor TG54 and I - Tre' 21:09:54 03/07/07 (5)

Re: Sorry, that was an inside joke between my good friend and neighbor TG54 and I - AJinFLA 14:54:27 03/08/07 (4)

Re: Sorry, that was an inside joke between my good friend and neighbor TG54 and I - Tre' 15:50:39 03/08/07 (3)

Re: Sorry, that was an inside joke between my good friend and neighbor TG54 and I - AJinFLA 16:12:45 03/08/07 (2)

Re: Sorry, that was an inside joke between my good friend and neighbor TG54 and I - Tre' 18:58:30 03/08/07 (1)

Or as the article at the top of the page suggests - E-Stat 05:46:55 03/09/07 (0)

I agree. We are on the same page. (nt) - Tre' 09:23:16 03/07/07 (0)

Re: Sorry, that was an inside joke between my good friend and neighbor TG54 and I - theaudiohobby 06:39:44 03/07/07 (2)

Re: Sorry, that was an inside joke between my good friend and neighbor TG54 and I - kerr 07:49:02 03/07/07 (0)

Yes, amplified live music is A much better reference than reproduced. (nt). - cheap-Jack 07:17:57 03/07/07 (0)