|
Propeller Head Plaza Technical and scientific discussion of amps, cables and other topics. |
|
|
|
Propeller Head Plaza Technical and scientific discussion of amps, cables and other topics. |
|
In Reply to: My claim at JREF has been acrimoniously rejected... posted by Wellfed on April 27, 2005 at 07:01:06:
I slogged through the summary page and a bunch of the 20 pages of rambling. I'm not sure exactly what the problem is. The process seemed to be:1- You submitted a protocol
2- Kramer, or whomever, asked for some changes
3- You made some changes he asked for, and some he didn't
4- He asked for some clarification
5- You clarified a few things, and left some unclear
6- Etc...It seems like a general breakdown in communication. Basically, you need to submit a thorough proposal for testing, and in the process of clarifying and making things more clear to each other, both sides got frustrated.
Your original proposal was horribly vague in several areas, and I never saw any of these cleared up. Instead of clarifying, you made changes. Then those changes needed clarification. (IE I never really got why you needed a "placebo" chip, how about one treated and one left alone?)
I think what really sunk you was that you wouldn't submit a definitive date. All you had to do was say "June 27" and get a yes/no reply. You're going to have a bunch of people flying to your house, a "sometime in June" timeframe won't cut it.
/*Music is subjective. Sound is not.*/
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Problems - jbmcb 17:18:13 04/27/05 (2)
- And suggestions :) - jbmcb 19:25:42 04/27/05 (1)
- Unfortunately... - Wellfed 20:51:28 04/27/05 (0)
Top of Page ]
[ Contact Us ]
[ Support/Wish List ]
[ Copyright © 2024, Audio Asylum, all rights reserved ]
