In Reply to: Well, I'd have rejected your claim when you wanted to coat the CDs . . . posted by Pat D on April 30, 2005 at 06:36:35:
I agree, given all the attention given the self DBT matter, I should have stepped back, agreed to this request and then resumed negotiations. The Vivid treatment was a part of my original protocol proposal and it took them some time to reject that proposal. In retrospect there seems to have been a lot of putting the cart before the horse coming from both sides. In my defense, I was simply looking to have a protocol established to base my blind testing upon. JREF does not stipulate self testing as a requirement. They simply recommend it. A confused and acrimonious muddle resulted.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- I appreciate you response... - Wellfed 11:32:19 04/30/05 (0)