In Reply to: Re: guru posted by Buzzman on March 8, 2007 at 13:30:07:
"Yes, Dennis / Jeff should not present their hypothesis as an absolute truth, or Truth; but did they"Yes they did. Jeff has said "If you don't have low DCR your system can be no better than lo-fi"
"Yes, their hypothesis may appear flawed"
Their original position is now flawed by their own admission.
"the commonly-used terms teacher, mentor, etc are less inflammatory than guru"
Both teacher and mentor are modern definitions of guru. Definition 2b.
"A trusted counselor and adviser; a mentor."Now get back to "da ladeeez".
Tre'
P.S. "Are you saying it is better for a teacher to stick to some arbitrary line even though experience, research, knowledge, etc. come to indicate something different?"
Your point is well taken but Jeff has been shoving this ever changing sh*t down everyone's throat for eight months or more now. If he really has something to say, he should have waited until he sorted it all out before telling everyone else that they were wrong.
.
Have Fun and Enjoy the Music
"Still Working the Problem"
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Re: guru - Tre' 15:00:57 03/08/07 (2)
- Geeze dude, I like the way you... - Buzzman 15:47:18 03/08/07 (1)
- Re: Geeze dude, I like the way you... - Tre' 16:26:59 03/08/07 (0)