In Reply to: RE: Seriously? That's what you got? posted by Charles Hansen on April 25, 2012 at 09:13:42:
By using your own ears.
If you think JV missed the boat on his sonic impressions of the piece in question, that's a completely fair and fun thing to challenge.
If you base your final take on a review or reviewer on whether or not he or she blows a metaphor or science-y-ish reference, then where was your post bitching at Fremer for thinking that there is such a thing as 25 carat gold?
;D
Your agenda is obvious, as is your disdain for JV and TAS.
That's fine, too. I was just pointing out you need better ammo.
Thinking you just won a 'gotcha' point by going after a fumbled tide pool zither metaphor is beneath you and takes away from your message, actually.
So, have you listened to the piece of gear in that review?
How do you compare and contrast your impression with JV's?
Is JV off base?
On what points?
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- "Is this also true for the rest of the review?" For any reviewer (as in any) there is only one way to answer.. - Enophile 09:31:12 04/25/12 (5)
- RE: "Is this also true for the rest of the review?" For any reviewer (as in any) there is only one way to answer.. - Charles Hansen 21:45:44 04/25/12 (4)
- RE: "Is this also true for the rest of the review?" For any reviewer (as in any) there is only one way to answer.. - josh358 19:34:43 04/28/12 (0)
- Didnt you make a comment in print about Regas DAC? - Kloss 13:00:02 04/26/12 (1)
- RE: Didnt you make a comment in print about Regas DAC? - Charles Hansen 16:24:08 04/26/12 (0)
- Woah! Stop the virtual press! There's something in TAS you WON'T comment on? - Enophile 07:35:18 04/26/12 (0)