Critic's Corner Discuss a review. Provide constructive feedback. Talk to the industry. |
|
In Reply to: RE: Welcome back , Charles posted by Beetlemania on May 1, 2012 at 21:52:23:
My involvement in this thread is much less a defense of Valin than it is a condemnation of Hansen. I enjoy taking shots at anyone that thinks Stereophile is better or "cleaner" than TAS. They both suffer from the same realities which prevent true objectivity.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups Full ThreadTopic - JV Breaks a Metphor? Need Help From the Left Coast (and Zither Players) - Charles Hansen 00:12:44 04/25/12 (116)
- You all make me want to quit - kev313 19:35:06 04/30/12 (2)
- Valid points, mostly - Charles Hansen 05:37:11 05/02/12 (1)
- Valid points, mostly - jamesgarvin 08:26:07 05/02/12 (0)
- the record he refers to is excellent sonically - ruxtonvet 19:39:59 04/29/12 (0)
- Welcome back , Charles - Beetlemania 21:21:50 04/26/12 (12)
- RE: Welcome back , Charles - JNS 13:04:27 05/01/12 (8)
- RE: Welcome back , Charles - Beetlemania 21:49:09 05/01/12 (0)
- RE: Welcome back , Charles - Charles Hansen 17:05:50 05/01/12 (6)
- RE: Welcome back , Charles - JNS 19:11:20 05/01/12 (5)
- RE: Welcome back , Charles - Beetlemania 21:52:23 05/01/12 (4)
- RE: Welcome back , Charles - JNS 21:31:22 05/02/12 (3)
- Strongly disagree - Beetlemania 07:23:53 05/03/12 (2)
- RE: Strongly disagree - Mike Mc 20:08:28 05/03/12 (1)
- RE: Strongly disagree - Mike Mc 22:57:52 05/03/12 (0)
- that kind of - hifitommy 19:11:18 04/29/12 (2)
- you may be - hifitommy 20:02:34 04/30/12 (0)
- Uhh... - Charles Hansen 19:06:23 04/30/12 (0)
- That Zither Player - Tobias 18:46:55 04/26/12 (0)
- TAS has become... - mkuller 11:22:24 04/26/12 (3)
- So what do you really think? :) - E-Stat 14:16:33 04/26/12 (2)
- Any word... - mkuller 12:14:52 04/27/12 (1)
- RE: Any word... - E-Stat 12:22:29 04/27/12 (0)
- RE: JV Breaks a Metphor? Need Help From the Left Coast (and Zither Players) - tomservo 10:02:40 04/26/12 (1)
- Thanks, Tom! (NT) - Charles Hansen 12:10:06 04/26/12 (0)
- RE: JV Breaks a Metphor? Need Help From the Left Coast (and Zither Players) - bjh 17:47:33 04/25/12 (0)
- RE: JV Breaks a Metphor? Need Help From the Left Coast (and Zither Players) - John Atkinson 14:23:22 04/25/12 (1)
- Good try... - Charles Hansen 22:08:46 04/25/12 (0)
- RE: JV Breaks a Metphor? Need Help From the Left Coast (and Zither Players) - jamesgarvin 10:59:56 04/25/12 (7)
- Good points, all -- thanks. (NT) - Charles Hansen 22:11:40 04/25/12 (0)
- “Falsus in unum, falsus in omnibus” - Tony Lauck 19:02:33 04/25/12 (4)
- RE: “Falsus in unum, falsus in omnibus” - jamesgarvin 20:22:22 04/25/12 (3)
- 57 - Tony Lauck 08:15:39 04/26/12 (1)
- One for each state!!! LOL! (nt) - mkuller 21:07:57 04/29/12 (0)
- " I'd give Fremer a pass" ... Yeah same here ... as for his editor ... a fail I'm afraid :) nt - bjh 20:29:44 04/25/12 (0)
- RE: JV Breaks a Metphor? Need Help From the Left Coast (and Zither Players) - asikhs 18:50:02 04/25/12 (0)
- Dunno 'bout zithers, but there are not any "currents" within a violin's body - John Marks 10:10:08 04/25/12 (1)
- You sure 'bout that? - Charles Hansen 21:56:15 04/25/12 (0)
- Seriously? That's what you got? - Enophile 08:15:47 04/25/12 (54)
- RE: Seriously? That's what you got? - Doug Schneider 13:43:31 04/25/12 (0)
- RE: Seriously? That's what you got? - Charles Hansen 09:13:42 04/25/12 (46)
- Your post reminded me of one I wrote here several years ago... - ecl876 08:06:21 04/29/12 (0)
- RE: Seriously? That's what you got? - Bill the K 20:26:21 04/25/12 (1)
- OK... - Charles Hansen 21:47:42 04/25/12 (0)
- RE: Seriously? That's what you got? - JNS 15:23:26 04/25/12 (36)
- RE: Seriously? That's what you got? - tmsorosk 05:15:35 05/10/12 (0)
- RE: Seriously? That's what you got? - Bill the K 01:40:12 04/27/12 (1)
- RE: Seriously? That's what you got? - JNS 16:08:10 04/28/12 (0)
- RE: Seriously? That's what you got? - audio39 04:05:56 04/26/12 (0)
- Hmmm - Charles Hansen 21:54:34 04/25/12 (31)
- RE: Hmmm - JNS 15:58:41 04/28/12 (0)
- TAS’s Little League Mentality - regmac 08:14:43 04/26/12 (28)
- The thing I don't understand - Charles Hansen 12:18:23 04/26/12 (27)
- Perhaps you can shed some light... - regmac 14:13:55 04/26/12 (26)
- RE: Perhaps you can shed some light... - Charles Hansen 16:14:04 04/26/12 (25)
- RE: Perhaps you can shed some light... - John Atkinson 08:33:29 04/27/12 (24)
- RE: Perhaps you can shed some light... - josh358 20:05:28 04/28/12 (8)
- RE: Perhaps you can shed some light... - John Atkinson 05:21:58 04/29/12 (7)
- Thanks for making me smile John, more relaxed like those days in the early 90's.~nT - Cleantimestream 17:32:10 05/09/12 (0)
- RE: Perhaps you can shed some light... - Bill the K 19:53:26 04/30/12 (1)
- Is there a direct relationship between.... - audio39 07:12:50 05/01/12 (0)
- RE: Perhaps you can shed some light... - Cpk 05:10:04 04/30/12 (0)
- RE: Perhaps you can shed some light... - josh358 07:38:09 04/29/12 (2)
- RE: Perhaps you can shed some light... - John Atkinson 11:55:35 04/29/12 (1)
- RE: Perhaps you can shed some light... - josh358 16:22:52 04/30/12 (0)
- Interesting... - Neil49 04:28:31 04/28/12 (14)
- Michael Fremer figured this out - Charles Hansen 17:32:01 04/29/12 (9)
- RE: Michael Fremer figured this out - Tony Lauck 20:02:17 04/30/12 (8)
- Why dismiss Consumer Reports - Bill the K 08:59:44 05/01/12 (7)
- RE: Why dismiss Consumer Reports - Tony Lauck 13:24:46 05/01/12 (0)
- If it were not for Ralph Nader... - Jim Austin 11:55:40 05/01/12 (5)
- Sample to Sample - Bill the K 20:04:51 05/01/12 (4)
- RE: Sample to Sample - Jim Austin 04:44:07 05/02/12 (3)
- Just for you, JA - Charles Hansen 05:07:11 05/02/12 (2)
- Thanks Charles - Jim Austin 05:39:08 05/02/12 (1)
- Value Engineering - Tony Lauck 12:08:46 05/02/12 (0)
- RE: Interesting... - RGA 11:16:22 04/28/12 (2)
- RE: Interesting... - BubbaMike 14:39:13 04/28/12 (1)
- RE: Interesting... - RGA 22:30:04 04/28/12 (0)
- RE: Interesting... - John Atkinson 08:08:23 04/28/12 (0)
- Interesting candor. -nt - soulfood 04:30:41 04/26/12 (0)
- "Is this also true for the rest of the review?" For any reviewer (as in any) there is only one way to answer.. - Enophile 09:31:12 04/25/12 (5)
- RE: "Is this also true for the rest of the review?" For any reviewer (as in any) there is only one way to answer.. - Charles Hansen 21:45:44 04/25/12 (4)
- RE: "Is this also true for the rest of the review?" For any reviewer (as in any) there is only one way to answer.. - josh358 19:34:43 04/28/12 (0)
- Didnt you make a comment in print about Regas DAC? - Kloss 13:00:02 04/26/12 (1)
- RE: Didnt you make a comment in print about Regas DAC? - Charles Hansen 16:24:08 04/26/12 (0)
- Woah! Stop the virtual press! There's something in TAS you WON'T comment on? - Enophile 07:35:18 04/26/12 (0)
- RE: yep - Cpk 09:00:34 04/25/12 (5)
- Well it must be said that your posts in the CA are illuminating, ... - bjh 18:18:58 04/25/12 (1)
- RE: I see the detritus has washed in - Cpk 19:26:24 04/25/12 (0)
- RE: yep - Charles Hansen 09:25:29 04/25/12 (2)
- RE: yep - Cpk 10:25:16 04/25/12 (1)
- Fair enough. (NT) - Charles Hansen 21:38:51 04/25/12 (0)
- Well done - Metralla 05:53:44 04/25/12 (23)
- RE: Well done - jvalin@cinci.rr.com 10:07:37 04/26/12 (22)
- We report, you decide - Charles Hansen 15:30:22 04/26/12 (0)
- RE: Well done - Brian Cheney 12:58:33 04/26/12 (20)
- RE: Well done - jvalin@cinci.rr.com 13:17:22 04/26/12 (19)
- "his small circle of fanboys just chime in in agreement " - Metralla 19:36:12 04/26/12 (2)
- Delicious irony - Beetlemania 21:11:24 04/26/12 (0)
- RE: "his small circle of fanboys just chime in in agreement " - jvalin@cinci.rr.com 19:53:07 04/26/12 (0)
- RE: Well done - Tony Lauck 17:50:46 04/26/12 (14)
- RE: Well done - Mike Mc 22:33:54 04/26/12 (0)
- RE: Well done - jvalin@cinci.rr.com 19:46:04 04/26/12 (12)
- RE: Well done - Tony Lauck 21:13:01 04/26/12 (11)
- RE: Well done - jvalin@cinci.rr.com 21:32:23 04/26/12 (9)
- RE: Well done - JNS 13:10:31 05/01/12 (0)
- RE: Well done - Tony Lauck 22:20:28 04/26/12 (7)
- RE: Well done - soulfood 06:54:57 04/27/12 (6)
- RE: Well done - Tony Lauck 07:25:19 04/27/12 (5)
- RE: Well done - soulfood 09:05:57 04/27/12 (4)
- RE: Well done - Tony Lauck 10:41:24 04/27/12 (3)
- RE: Well done - soulfood 11:26:24 04/27/12 (2)
- RE: Well done - Tony Lauck 12:18:56 04/27/12 (1)
- RE: Well done - soulfood 13:25:00 04/27/12 (0)
- RE: Well done - jvalin@cinci.rr.com 21:28:26 04/26/12 (0)
- RE: Well done - soulfood 15:25:06 04/26/12 (0)
Follow Ups
- RE: Welcome back , Charles - JNS 21:31:22 05/02/12 (3)
- Strongly disagree - Beetlemania 07:23:53 05/03/12 (2)
- RE: Strongly disagree - Mike Mc 20:08:28 05/03/12 (1)
- RE: Strongly disagree - Mike Mc 22:57:52 05/03/12 (0)