Home General Asylum

General audio topics that don't fit into specific categories.

Re: My Take on These Speakers v. MF & JA

I'm afraid I will disappoint you as I never thought these speakers were worthy of a very extended listen from me, much less a review. I could not stand listen to them for a very long time, though I was looking for new speakers at the time.

As Fremer wrote, "the Silverback's silk dome won't please everyone—sometimes I felt it sounded a bit forward or 'hashy.'" That's how I felt they sounded all the time I heard them. And they were being driven with Sim Audio electronics with which I was very familiar and which could not have been responsible for what I was hearing.

To JA's credit he expresses "disappointment" with the speakers' measured performance.

Nevertheless Fremer concludes, "the DeVore Fidelity Silverback Reference is one of the most enjoyable and highest-performing speakers I've reviewed." Though he also throws in some caveats, he does toss out a lot of quotes like this that the manufacturer will no doubt use in his ads--in Stereophile.

Remember where this all originates within this thread. It is a search for indirect evidence that there is something other than speaker quality that results in great reviews.

Fremer's last quote and Stereophile's award of a Catagory "A" rating for a speaker that I couldn't abide is very strong evidence for me, at least, that something is amiss here.

Mel


This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
  Kimber Kable  


Follow Ups Full Thread
Follow Ups


You can not post to an archived thread.