So, you don't think differences in hearing physiology affect listening preferences? (nt) - Dave Kingsland

Follow Ups Full Thread

Topic - Speaker measurements vs Subjective Reviews... - mkuller 16:20:53 02/20/07 (72)

It has to be subjective when it comes to auditioning speakers, - fortysomething 08:57:54 02/21/07 (15)

Re: It has to be subjective when it comes to auditioning speakers, - Kal Rubinson 19:35:56 02/21/07 (14)

Re: It has to be subjective when it comes to auditioning speakers, - Dave Kingsland 16:16:02 02/22/07 (12)

Re: It has to be subjective when it comes to auditioning speakers, - hahax@verizon.net 20:50:13 02/22/07 (1)

Re: It has to be subjective when it comes to auditioning speakers, - Dave Kingsland 09:10:55 02/23/07 (0)

Re: It has to be subjective when it comes to auditioning speakers, - Kal Rubinson 17:16:07 02/22/07 (9)

Re: It has to be subjective when it comes to auditioning speakers, - Dave Kingsland 10:10:28 02/23/07 (8)

Re: It has to be subjective when it comes to auditioning speakers, - Kal Rubinson 07:23:35 02/24/07 (2)

So, you don't think differences in hearing physiology affect listening preferences? (nt) - Dave Kingsland 19:06:30 02/27/07 (1)

Only if they run to the pathological(nt) - Kal Rubinson 19:53:51 02/27/07 (0)

Re: It has to be subjective when it comes to auditioning speakers, - morricab 13:34:26 02/23/07 (0)

This is the road to perdition! ;-) - markrohr 12:26:33 02/23/07 (3)

Re: This is the road to perdition! ;-) - Dave Kingsland 13:54:17 02/23/07 (2)

Thanks, Dave - markrohr 06:37:40 02/24/07 (1)

Thank you also - Dave Kingsland 19:19:34 02/27/07 (0)

Re: It has to be subjective when it comes to auditioning speakers, - hahax@verizon.net 20:27:57 02/21/07 (0)

Of two useless things which is less useless? - Don T 08:52:35 02/21/07 (0)

They just beg different kinds of questions. - Al Sekela 07:27:02 02/21/07 (6)

Good reviews don't... - mkuller 09:53:15 02/21/07 (5)

Jonathan Valin on 'Class D' amps. - Al Sekela 09:49:10 02/22/07 (1)

Re: Jonathan Valin on 'Class D' amps. - theaudiohobby 11:30:27 02/22/07 (0)

Re: Good reviews don't... - Ralph 13:46:07 02/21/07 (2)

I was being generous. - Al Sekela 09:52:01 02/22/07 (1)

Re: Precisely- they have little to do with what is 'compelling' nt - Ralph 10:50:28 02/22/07 (0)

kind of a false choice - Bruce from DC 07:09:16 02/21/07 (3)

Dipoles are direct radiators - Tom Brennan 07:15:54 02/21/07 (2)

Re: Dipoles are direct radiators - Bruce from DC 07:34:47 02/21/07 (1)

Re: Dipoles are direct radiators - Tom Brennan 08:57:59 02/21/07 (0)

Re: Speaker measurements vs Subjective Reviews... - RGA 06:52:59 02/21/07 (0)

I'd take the review IF... - kerr 04:57:39 02/21/07 (0)

I'll take both thank you - Schu 04:29:17 02/21/07 (0)

Re: Speaker measurements vs Subjective Reviews... - Dan Banquer 04:17:28 02/21/07 (0)

Re: Speaker measurements vs Subjective Reviews... - mauimusicman 03:00:26 02/21/07 (28)

Fortunately, that's not the way it works... - mkuller 09:46:05 02/21/07 (27)

That is a Matter of Opinion - Mel 19:24:46 02/21/07 (18)

You know what they say about assumptions... - mkuller 11:21:08 02/22/07 (12)

Re: There is Evidence-You Just Have to be Open to it! - Mel 13:02:16 02/22/07 (11)

You say evidence... - mkuller 13:27:48 02/22/07 (10)

Re: Try This one. - Mel 13:36:09 02/22/07 (9)

Re: Hey Mike, This is Evidence. Where'd you go? nt - Mel 05:44:07 02/23/07 (8)

Don't know the speaker... - mkuller 09:57:32 02/23/07 (7)

Re: For your convenience here it is: - Mel 11:30:56 02/23/07 (6)

Ok, I've read... - mkuller 15:11:07 02/23/07 (5)

Re: My Take on These Speakers v. MF & JA - Mel 17:44:27 02/23/07 (4)

Woof... - mkuller 10:26:28 02/24/07 (3)

Re: Hey, I'll Keep Barking - Mel 18:08:52 02/24/07 (2)

Re: Hey, I'll Keep Barking - Dan Banquer 05:01:12 02/26/07 (0)

One final comment... - mkuller 21:51:59 02/24/07 (0)

Re: That is a Matter of Opinion - mauimusicman 02:36:54 02/22/07 (4)

To bad he didn't listen to them...(nt) - mkuller 11:22:00 02/22/07 (3)

Re: He Says He Did Listen to Them. - Mel 11:40:45 02/22/07 (2)

As a reviewer... - mkuller 11:54:23 02/22/07 (1)

Re: When Fremer Pays Full Price or Promises . . . - Mel 13:24:03 02/22/07 (0)

Re: Fortunately, that's not the way it works... - mauimusicman 13:43:51 02/21/07 (7)

Different issues... - mkuller 13:56:02 02/21/07 (6)

Re: Different issues... - mauimusicman 02:33:59 02/22/07 (5)

Re: Different issues... - Dan Banquer 04:24:48 02/22/07 (4)

Re: Different issues... - mauimusicman 13:06:19 02/22/07 (3)

Re: Different issues... - Dan Banquer 17:15:29 02/22/07 (2)

Honesty? - mkuller 10:00:22 02/23/07 (1)

Grasping at straws? - Dan Banquer 11:18:17 02/23/07 (0)

More important : measurements - KlausR. 01:23:24 02/21/07 (0)

Re: Speaker measurements vs Subjective Reviews... - Andy.G 23:05:53 02/20/07 (0)

silly question - CD 22:55:55 02/20/07 (0)

Is this at the heart of the 'objectivist - subjectivist' differences? - jensw 21:46:19 02/20/07 (0)

I seldom consider speaker measurements. nt - Norm 20:31:46 02/20/07 (1)

Attaboy! nt - clarkjohnsen 08:55:59 02/21/07 (0)

Re: Neither - Jim Willis 18:45:15 02/20/07 (1)

Re: Neither - Pat D 06:40:42 02/21/07 (0)

It certainly depends on the reviewer....for some I'd rather have measurements! nt - TomLarson 16:47:27 02/20/07 (0)

Re: Speaker measurements vs Subjective Reviews... - middleground 16:46:25 02/20/07 (1)

Good and reasoned response - Sean 21:38:45 02/20/07 (0)

Follow Ups

So, you don't think differences in hearing physiology affect listening preferences? (nt) - Dave Kingsland 19:06:30 02/27/07 (1)

Only if they run to the pathological(nt) - Kal Rubinson 19:53:51 02/27/07 (0)