In Reply to: That is a Matter of Opinion posted by Mel on February 21, 2007 at 19:24:46:
>But you were a reviewer in a totally different age in a publication that, for all intents and purposes, no longer exists. Ancient history just doesn't hack it.>My last article was printed about 6 years ago. I'm not sure that was a different era.
If you have actual evidence that the magazines are putting pressure on the reviewers to skew their writing in a positive manner in this era, please present it. Otherwise, it's just your paranoid fantasies getting the beter of you.
>(Time, perhaps, to change the letter after your name?)>
When I registered on AA a few years ago, I did it as just another audiophile. They recognized my name and required me to have the (R) after my name. Not my choice.
>These days almost all speaker reviews (and most are on webzines) become exercises in creative writing to say in 5000 words or more nothing really beyond "I like this speaker.>
Sorry, I don't read the webzines. I consider the print reviewers to be 'paid, professional journalists' and I expect them to hold to a pretty high standard. And the first tenet of a good review is to entertaian the reader.
Anyone can write a review on the web.
>Look at the review of the Wilson Maxx 2 that measures so poorly, for example. Without measurements the TAS review hardly gives any information or insight, of any kind, at all.>
I'm not sure the Stereophile review correlates very well with the measurements, so what difference would measurements of the speaker make in TAS?
Have you heard these speakers? A neighbor had the original MAXXs driven by top of the line Krell equipment and they sounded pretty amazing.
>...though I have heard some very bad speakers.>
Did you read good reviews of those 'bad' speakers?
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- You know what they say about assumptions... - mkuller 11:21:08 02/22/07 (12)
- Re: There is Evidence-You Just Have to be Open to it! - Mel 13:02:16 02/22/07 (11)
- You say evidence... - mkuller 13:27:48 02/22/07 (10)
- Re: Try This one. - Mel 13:36:09 02/22/07 (9)
- Re: Hey Mike, This is Evidence. Where'd you go? nt - Mel 05:44:07 02/23/07 (8)
- Don't know the speaker... - mkuller 09:57:32 02/23/07 (7)
- Re: For your convenience here it is: - Mel 11:30:56 02/23/07 (6)
- Ok, I've read... - mkuller 15:11:07 02/23/07 (5)
- Re: My Take on These Speakers v. MF & JA - Mel 17:44:27 02/23/07 (4)
- Woof... - mkuller 10:26:28 02/24/07 (3)
- Re: Hey, I'll Keep Barking - Mel 18:08:52 02/24/07 (2)
- Re: Hey, I'll Keep Barking - Dan Banquer 05:01:12 02/26/07 (0)
- One final comment... - mkuller 21:51:59 02/24/07 (0)