In Reply to: Speaker measurements vs Subjective Reviews... posted by mkuller on February 20, 2007 at 16:20:53:
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups Full ThreadTopic - Speaker measurements vs Subjective Reviews... - mkuller 16:20:53 02/20/07 (72)
- It has to be subjective when it comes to auditioning speakers, - fortysomething 08:57:54 02/21/07 (15)
- Re: It has to be subjective when it comes to auditioning speakers, - Kal Rubinson 19:35:56 02/21/07 (14)
- Re: It has to be subjective when it comes to auditioning speakers, - Dave Kingsland 16:16:02 02/22/07 (12)
- Re: It has to be subjective when it comes to auditioning speakers, - hahax@verizon.net 20:50:13 02/22/07 (1)
- Re: It has to be subjective when it comes to auditioning speakers, - Dave Kingsland 09:10:55 02/23/07 (0)
- Re: It has to be subjective when it comes to auditioning speakers, - Kal Rubinson 17:16:07 02/22/07 (9)
- Re: It has to be subjective when it comes to auditioning speakers, - Dave Kingsland 10:10:28 02/23/07 (8)
- Re: It has to be subjective when it comes to auditioning speakers, - Kal Rubinson 07:23:35 02/24/07 (2)
- So, you don't think differences in hearing physiology affect listening preferences? (nt) - Dave Kingsland 19:06:30 02/27/07 (1)
- Only if they run to the pathological(nt) - Kal Rubinson 19:53:51 02/27/07 (0)
- Re: It has to be subjective when it comes to auditioning speakers, - morricab 13:34:26 02/23/07 (0)
- This is the road to perdition! ;-) - markrohr 12:26:33 02/23/07 (3)
- Re: This is the road to perdition! ;-) - Dave Kingsland 13:54:17 02/23/07 (2)
- Thanks, Dave - markrohr 06:37:40 02/24/07 (1)
- Thank you also - Dave Kingsland 19:19:34 02/27/07 (0)
- Re: It has to be subjective when it comes to auditioning speakers, - hahax@verizon.net 20:27:57 02/21/07 (0)
- Of two useless things which is less useless? - Don T 08:52:35 02/21/07 (0)
- They just beg different kinds of questions. - Al Sekela 07:27:02 02/21/07 (6)
- Good reviews don't... - mkuller 09:53:15 02/21/07 (5)
- Jonathan Valin on 'Class D' amps. - Al Sekela 09:49:10 02/22/07 (1)
- Re: Jonathan Valin on 'Class D' amps. - theaudiohobby 11:30:27 02/22/07 (0)
- Re: Good reviews don't... - Ralph 13:46:07 02/21/07 (2)
- I was being generous. - Al Sekela 09:52:01 02/22/07 (1)
- Re: Precisely- they have little to do with what is 'compelling' nt - Ralph 10:50:28 02/22/07 (0)
- kind of a false choice - Bruce from DC 07:09:16 02/21/07 (3)
- Dipoles are direct radiators - Tom Brennan 07:15:54 02/21/07 (2)
- Re: Dipoles are direct radiators - Bruce from DC 07:34:47 02/21/07 (1)
- Re: Dipoles are direct radiators - Tom Brennan 08:57:59 02/21/07 (0)
- Re: Speaker measurements vs Subjective Reviews... - RGA 06:52:59 02/21/07 (0)
- I'd take the review IF... - kerr 04:57:39 02/21/07 (0)
- I'll take both thank you - Schu 04:29:17 02/21/07 (0)
- Re: Speaker measurements vs Subjective Reviews... - Dan Banquer 04:17:28 02/21/07 (0)
- Re: Speaker measurements vs Subjective Reviews... - mauimusicman 03:00:26 02/21/07 (28)
- Fortunately, that's not the way it works... - mkuller 09:46:05 02/21/07 (27)
- That is a Matter of Opinion - Mel 19:24:46 02/21/07 (18)
- You know what they say about assumptions... - mkuller 11:21:08 02/22/07 (12)
- Re: There is Evidence-You Just Have to be Open to it! - Mel 13:02:16 02/22/07 (11)
- You say evidence... - mkuller 13:27:48 02/22/07 (10)
- Re: Try This one. - Mel 13:36:09 02/22/07 (9)
- Re: Hey Mike, This is Evidence. Where'd you go? nt - Mel 05:44:07 02/23/07 (8)
- Don't know the speaker... - mkuller 09:57:32 02/23/07 (7)
- Re: For your convenience here it is: - Mel 11:30:56 02/23/07 (6)
- Ok, I've read... - mkuller 15:11:07 02/23/07 (5)
- Re: My Take on These Speakers v. MF & JA - Mel 17:44:27 02/23/07 (4)
- Woof... - mkuller 10:26:28 02/24/07 (3)
- Re: Hey, I'll Keep Barking - Mel 18:08:52 02/24/07 (2)
- Re: Hey, I'll Keep Barking - Dan Banquer 05:01:12 02/26/07 (0)
- One final comment... - mkuller 21:51:59 02/24/07 (0)
- Re: That is a Matter of Opinion - mauimusicman 02:36:54 02/22/07 (4)
- To bad he didn't listen to them...(nt) - mkuller 11:22:00 02/22/07 (3)
- Re: He Says He Did Listen to Them. - Mel 11:40:45 02/22/07 (2)
- As a reviewer... - mkuller 11:54:23 02/22/07 (1)
- Re: When Fremer Pays Full Price or Promises . . . - Mel 13:24:03 02/22/07 (0)
- Re: Fortunately, that's not the way it works... - mauimusicman 13:43:51 02/21/07 (7)
- Different issues... - mkuller 13:56:02 02/21/07 (6)
- Re: Different issues... - mauimusicman 02:33:59 02/22/07 (5)
- Re: Different issues... - Dan Banquer 04:24:48 02/22/07 (4)
- Re: Different issues... - mauimusicman 13:06:19 02/22/07 (3)
- Re: Different issues... - Dan Banquer 17:15:29 02/22/07 (2)
- Honesty? - mkuller 10:00:22 02/23/07 (1)
- Grasping at straws? - Dan Banquer 11:18:17 02/23/07 (0)
- More important : measurements - KlausR. 01:23:24 02/21/07 (0)
- Re: Speaker measurements vs Subjective Reviews... - Andy.G 23:05:53 02/20/07 (0)
- silly question - CD 22:55:55 02/20/07 (0)
- Is this at the heart of the 'objectivist - subjectivist' differences? - jensw 21:46:19 02/20/07 (0)
- I seldom consider speaker measurements. nt - Norm 20:31:46 02/20/07 (1)
- Attaboy! nt - clarkjohnsen 08:55:59 02/21/07 (0)
- Re: Neither - Jim Willis 18:45:15 02/20/07 (1)
- Re: Neither - Pat D 06:40:42 02/21/07 (0)
- It certainly depends on the reviewer....for some I'd rather have measurements! nt - TomLarson 16:47:27 02/20/07 (0)
- Re: Speaker measurements vs Subjective Reviews... - middleground 16:46:25 02/20/07 (1)
- Good and reasoned response - Sean 21:38:45 02/20/07 (0)
Follow Ups
- It certainly depends on the reviewer....for some I'd rather have measurements! nt - TomLarson 16:47:27 02/20/07 (0)