In Reply to: Re: Good reviews don't... posted by Ralph on February 21, 2007 at 13:46:07:
Many 'objective' reviews are based on the switches on the faceplates of the measurement equipment at hand.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups Full ThreadTopic - Speaker measurements vs Subjective Reviews... - mkuller 16:20:53 02/20/07 (72)
- It has to be subjective when it comes to auditioning speakers, - fortysomething 08:57:54 02/21/07 (15)
- Re: It has to be subjective when it comes to auditioning speakers, - Kal Rubinson 19:35:56 02/21/07 (14)
- Re: It has to be subjective when it comes to auditioning speakers, - Dave Kingsland 16:16:02 02/22/07 (12)
- Re: It has to be subjective when it comes to auditioning speakers, - hahax@verizon.net 20:50:13 02/22/07 (1)
- Re: It has to be subjective when it comes to auditioning speakers, - Dave Kingsland 09:10:55 02/23/07 (0)
- Re: It has to be subjective when it comes to auditioning speakers, - Kal Rubinson 17:16:07 02/22/07 (9)
- Re: It has to be subjective when it comes to auditioning speakers, - Dave Kingsland 10:10:28 02/23/07 (8)
- Re: It has to be subjective when it comes to auditioning speakers, - Kal Rubinson 07:23:35 02/24/07 (2)
- So, you don't think differences in hearing physiology affect listening preferences? (nt) - Dave Kingsland 19:06:30 02/27/07 (1)
- Only if they run to the pathological(nt) - Kal Rubinson 19:53:51 02/27/07 (0)
- Re: It has to be subjective when it comes to auditioning speakers, - morricab 13:34:26 02/23/07 (0)
- This is the road to perdition! ;-) - markrohr 12:26:33 02/23/07 (3)
- Re: This is the road to perdition! ;-) - Dave Kingsland 13:54:17 02/23/07 (2)
- Thanks, Dave - markrohr 06:37:40 02/24/07 (1)
- Thank you also - Dave Kingsland 19:19:34 02/27/07 (0)
- Re: It has to be subjective when it comes to auditioning speakers, - hahax@verizon.net 20:27:57 02/21/07 (0)
- Of two useless things which is less useless? - Don T 08:52:35 02/21/07 (0)
- They just beg different kinds of questions. - Al Sekela 07:27:02 02/21/07 (6)
- Good reviews don't... - mkuller 09:53:15 02/21/07 (5)
- Jonathan Valin on 'Class D' amps. - Al Sekela 09:49:10 02/22/07 (1)
- Re: Jonathan Valin on 'Class D' amps. - theaudiohobby 11:30:27 02/22/07 (0)
- Re: Good reviews don't... - Ralph 13:46:07 02/21/07 (2)
- I was being generous. - Al Sekela 09:52:01 02/22/07 (1)
- Re: Precisely- they have little to do with what is 'compelling' nt - Ralph 10:50:28 02/22/07 (0)
- kind of a false choice - Bruce from DC 07:09:16 02/21/07 (3)
- Dipoles are direct radiators - Tom Brennan 07:15:54 02/21/07 (2)
- Re: Dipoles are direct radiators - Bruce from DC 07:34:47 02/21/07 (1)
- Re: Dipoles are direct radiators - Tom Brennan 08:57:59 02/21/07 (0)
- Re: Speaker measurements vs Subjective Reviews... - RGA 06:52:59 02/21/07 (0)
- I'd take the review IF... - kerr 04:57:39 02/21/07 (0)
- I'll take both thank you - Schu 04:29:17 02/21/07 (0)
- Re: Speaker measurements vs Subjective Reviews... - Dan Banquer 04:17:28 02/21/07 (0)
- Re: Speaker measurements vs Subjective Reviews... - mauimusicman 03:00:26 02/21/07 (28)
- Fortunately, that's not the way it works... - mkuller 09:46:05 02/21/07 (27)
- That is a Matter of Opinion - Mel 19:24:46 02/21/07 (18)
- You know what they say about assumptions... - mkuller 11:21:08 02/22/07 (12)
- Re: There is Evidence-You Just Have to be Open to it! - Mel 13:02:16 02/22/07 (11)
- You say evidence... - mkuller 13:27:48 02/22/07 (10)
- Re: Try This one. - Mel 13:36:09 02/22/07 (9)
- Re: Hey Mike, This is Evidence. Where'd you go? nt - Mel 05:44:07 02/23/07 (8)
- Don't know the speaker... - mkuller 09:57:32 02/23/07 (7)
- Re: For your convenience here it is: - Mel 11:30:56 02/23/07 (6)
- Ok, I've read... - mkuller 15:11:07 02/23/07 (5)
- Re: My Take on These Speakers v. MF & JA - Mel 17:44:27 02/23/07 (4)
- Woof... - mkuller 10:26:28 02/24/07 (3)
- Re: Hey, I'll Keep Barking - Mel 18:08:52 02/24/07 (2)
- Re: Hey, I'll Keep Barking - Dan Banquer 05:01:12 02/26/07 (0)
- One final comment... - mkuller 21:51:59 02/24/07 (0)
- Re: That is a Matter of Opinion - mauimusicman 02:36:54 02/22/07 (4)
- To bad he didn't listen to them...(nt) - mkuller 11:22:00 02/22/07 (3)
- Re: He Says He Did Listen to Them. - Mel 11:40:45 02/22/07 (2)
- As a reviewer... - mkuller 11:54:23 02/22/07 (1)
- Re: When Fremer Pays Full Price or Promises . . . - Mel 13:24:03 02/22/07 (0)
- Re: Fortunately, that's not the way it works... - mauimusicman 13:43:51 02/21/07 (7)
- Different issues... - mkuller 13:56:02 02/21/07 (6)
- Re: Different issues... - mauimusicman 02:33:59 02/22/07 (5)
- Re: Different issues... - Dan Banquer 04:24:48 02/22/07 (4)
- Re: Different issues... - mauimusicman 13:06:19 02/22/07 (3)
- Re: Different issues... - Dan Banquer 17:15:29 02/22/07 (2)
- Honesty? - mkuller 10:00:22 02/23/07 (1)
- Grasping at straws? - Dan Banquer 11:18:17 02/23/07 (0)
- More important : measurements - KlausR. 01:23:24 02/21/07 (0)
- Re: Speaker measurements vs Subjective Reviews... - Andy.G 23:05:53 02/20/07 (0)
- silly question - CD 22:55:55 02/20/07 (0)
- Is this at the heart of the 'objectivist - subjectivist' differences? - jensw 21:46:19 02/20/07 (0)
- I seldom consider speaker measurements. nt - Norm 20:31:46 02/20/07 (1)
- Attaboy! nt - clarkjohnsen 08:55:59 02/21/07 (0)
- Re: Neither - Jim Willis 18:45:15 02/20/07 (1)
- Re: Neither - Pat D 06:40:42 02/21/07 (0)
- It certainly depends on the reviewer....for some I'd rather have measurements! nt - TomLarson 16:47:27 02/20/07 (0)
- Re: Speaker measurements vs Subjective Reviews... - middleground 16:46:25 02/20/07 (1)
- Good and reasoned response - Sean 21:38:45 02/20/07 (0)
Follow Ups
- I was being generous. - Al Sekela 09:52:01 02/22/07 (1)
- Re: Precisely- they have little to do with what is 'compelling' nt - Ralph 10:50:28 02/22/07 (0)