In Reply to: What would reviewers own... posted by AudioDwebe on June 13, 2012 at 12:55:14:
let me try and explain.
I've read tons of reviews by the major reviewers in Stereophile and TAS (sorry if I offend any reviewers here) where at the end, the reviewer will say something like, "I liked it so much, I bought the reviewed xxx."
And what shocks me at these times is the price of the item. It'll be like a 25K amp or 40K speakers or...you get the idea. At those times, I wonder what these folks do for their living.
I realize that as Josh said, reviewers of verying incomes provide their perspective of the various items reviewed. And, with varying amounts of income put towards audio, some will put more whereas others might put less.
But at the same time, I've read over the years of reviewers being provided with the equipment from the manufactures for an uber long time (as in forever) loan or at super discounted prices, prices none of us would ever see unless it came out hot out of a thief's trunk. And I understand that, manufacturers want their products named in other future reviews written by the reviewer.
However, many of us (myself included) do not have the skill set to be a reviewer of any caliber and therefore are not privy to the goings-on between manufacturer and reviewer and the secret handshakes they share. We're generally forced to scour the pages of AudioGon, Asylum Trader, Craigslist, etcetera for the equipment we're in search of at prices that are reasonable to our varying degrees of disposeable incomes.
Having said all that, back to my original question: What would the Mr. Fremers and Mr. Harleys of the reviewing world own IF every piece of equipment in their system was purchased like the rest of the non-reviewing family of audiophiles?
"Man, that mouse is Awesome." - Kaemon (referring to Jerry, of Tom and Jerry fame)
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- I think my question has to do with value... - AudioDwebe 09:01:18 06/16/12 (48)
- I know I would have bought the same stuff... - mkuller 10:57:45 06/16/12 (0)
- RE: I think my question has to do with value... - John Atkinson 10:14:00 06/16/12 (46)
- RE: I think my question has to do with value... - the old school 22:04:37 06/18/12 (0)
- RE: I think my question has to do with value... - robert26 14:26:16 06/18/12 (1)
- RE: I think my question has to do with value... - John Atkinson 16:59:53 06/18/12 (0)
- RE: I think my question has to do with value... - AudioDwebe 14:35:00 06/16/12 (0)
- RE: I think my question has to do with value... - jamesgarvin 13:10:55 06/16/12 (41)
- RE: I think my question has to do with value... - JNS 15:43:45 06/18/12 (2)
- RE: I think my question has to do with value... - jamesgarvin 21:34:46 06/18/12 (0)
- RE: I think my question has to do with value... - John Atkinson 16:50:36 06/18/12 (0)
- RE: I think my question has to do with value... - John Atkinson 14:35:23 06/16/12 (37)
- RE: I think my question has to do with value... - jamesgarvin 22:36:30 06/16/12 (36)
- RE: I think my question has to do with value... - John Atkinson 05:54:11 06/19/12 (35)
- So... - robert26 11:41:52 06/19/12 (34)
- RE: So... - John Atkinson 13:53:42 06/19/12 (33)
- RE: So... - robert26 14:42:43 06/19/12 (32)
- RE: So... - John Atkinson 09:27:54 06/20/12 (31)
- RE: So... - jamesgarvin 11:18:29 06/20/12 (18)
- RE: So... - RGA 07:12:15 06/25/12 (16)
- RE: So... - the old school 22:10:11 07/01/12 (15)
- That's ridiculous! - Gag Halfrunt 06:57:14 07/02/12 (14)
- RE: That's ridiculous! - the old school 09:41:10 07/02/12 (13)
- RE: That's ridiculous! - Gag Halfrunt 04:23:00 07/03/12 (12)
- RE: That's ridiculous! - RGA 18:44:35 07/04/12 (0)
- RE: That's ridiculous! - the old school 06:11:04 07/03/12 (10)
- RE: That's ridiculous! - Gag Halfrunt 09:10:33 07/03/12 (9)
- RE: That's ridiculous! - the old school 10:14:49 07/03/12 (8)
- RE: That's ridiculous! - Gag Halfrunt 16:05:52 07/03/12 (7)
- RE: That's ridiculous! - RGA 20:00:01 07/04/12 (1)
- RE: That's ridiculous! - the old school 22:46:22 07/07/12 (0)
- RE: That's ridiculous! - the old school 21:34:09 07/03/12 (4)
- RE: That's ridiculous! - Gag Halfrunt 00:07:30 07/04/12 (3)
- RE: That's ridiculous! - the old school 06:56:42 07/04/12 (2)
- RE: That's ridiculous! - Gag Halfrunt 10:02:17 07/04/12 (0)
- RE: That's ridiculous! - Inmate51 09:24:49 07/04/12 (0)
- RE: So... - John Atkinson 12:21:49 06/20/12 (0)
- RE: So... - robert26 10:34:38 06/20/12 (11)
- RE: So... - John Atkinson 10:38:45 06/20/12 (10)
- RE: So... - robert26 10:55:15 06/20/12 (9)
- RE: So... - John Atkinson 12:26:45 06/20/12 (8)
- RE: So... - Inmate51 18:16:49 06/20/12 (2)
- RE: So... - robert26 14:10:02 06/20/12 (4)
- Oh come on... - Gag Halfrunt 15:05:46 06/20/12 (3)
- RE: Oh come on... - robert26 17:30:50 06/20/12 (2)
- RE: Oh come on... - Gag Halfrunt 01:49:55 06/21/12 (1)
- Agreed, Excellent Post! (nt) - Eric B 21:41:53 07/02/12 (0)