Home Critic's Corner

Discuss a review. Provide constructive feedback. Talk to the industry.

RE: So...

>I'm sorry Mr. Atkinson, I see nothing more than a pissing contest where
>you present yourself as more "ethical" than Mr. Harley.

Sorry you feel that way. Look, I don't care if you prefer TAS over
Stereophile, or Mr. Harley's policies over mine. That is your right.
But there a is real difference between the editors and magazines that
came out in the "Ask the Editors" session at the recent California show:
that I believe reviewers should purchase components when practicable for
use as long-term references and that Mr. Harley believes they shouldn't.
Both of our actions conform to those beliefs. As the two magazines are
in competition, I feel this difference should be borne in mind when the
two are compared.

>please slack a little on vendetta, or at least, try to keep it private,
>because this does not play in your favor.

This is not a vendetta; it is a real and I believe significant difference
between the two magazines' policies. I have not said anything critical of
Mr. Harley, only that I believe his publicly stated policy is the
antithesis of my own. I fail to grasp why my referring to Mr. Harley's
publicly expressed policy "does not play in [my] favor."

John Atkinson
Technical Editor, Stereophile



Edits: 06/20/12

This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
  VH Audio  


Follow Ups Full Thread
Follow Ups

FAQ

Post a Message!

Forgot Password?
Moniker (Username):
Password (Optional):
  Remember my Moniker & Password  (What's this?)    Eat Me
E-Mail (Optional):
Subject:
Message:   (Posts are subject to Content Rules)
Optional Link URL:
Optional Link Title:
Optional Image URL:
Upload Image:
E-mail Replies:  Automagically notify you when someone responds.