In Reply to: RE: So... posted by robert26 on June 19, 2012 at 14:42:43:
>I'm sorry Mr. Atkinson, I see nothing more than a pissing contest where
>you present yourself as more "ethical" than Mr. Harley.Sorry you feel that way. Look, I don't care if you prefer TAS over
Stereophile, or Mr. Harley's policies over mine. That is your right.
But there a is real difference between the editors and magazines that
came out in the "Ask the Editors" session at the recent California show:
that I believe reviewers should purchase components when practicable for
use as long-term references and that Mr. Harley believes they shouldn't.
Both of our actions conform to those beliefs. As the two magazines are
in competition, I feel this difference should be borne in mind when the
two are compared.>please slack a little on vendetta, or at least, try to keep it private,
>because this does not play in your favor.This is not a vendetta; it is a real and I believe significant difference
between the two magazines' policies. I have not said anything critical of
Mr. Harley, only that I believe his publicly stated policy is the
antithesis of my own. I fail to grasp why my referring to Mr. Harley's
publicly expressed policy "does not play in [my] favor."
John Atkinson
Technical Editor, Stereophile
Edits: 06/20/12
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- RE: So... - John Atkinson 09:27:54 06/20/12 (31)
- RE: So... - jamesgarvin 11:18:29 06/20/12 (18)
- RE: So... - RGA 07:12:15 06/25/12 (16)
- RE: So... - the old school 22:10:11 07/01/12 (15)
- That's ridiculous! - Gag Halfrunt 06:57:14 07/02/12 (14)
- RE: That's ridiculous! - the old school 09:41:10 07/02/12 (13)
- RE: That's ridiculous! - Gag Halfrunt 04:23:00 07/03/12 (12)
- RE: That's ridiculous! - RGA 18:44:35 07/04/12 (0)
- RE: That's ridiculous! - the old school 06:11:04 07/03/12 (10)
- RE: That's ridiculous! - Gag Halfrunt 09:10:33 07/03/12 (9)
- RE: That's ridiculous! - the old school 10:14:49 07/03/12 (8)
- RE: That's ridiculous! - Gag Halfrunt 16:05:52 07/03/12 (7)
- RE: That's ridiculous! - RGA 20:00:01 07/04/12 (1)
- RE: That's ridiculous! - the old school 22:46:22 07/07/12 (0)
- RE: That's ridiculous! - the old school 21:34:09 07/03/12 (4)
- RE: That's ridiculous! - Gag Halfrunt 00:07:30 07/04/12 (3)
- RE: That's ridiculous! - the old school 06:56:42 07/04/12 (2)
- RE: That's ridiculous! - Gag Halfrunt 10:02:17 07/04/12 (0)
- RE: That's ridiculous! - Inmate51 09:24:49 07/04/12 (0)
- RE: So... - John Atkinson 12:21:49 06/20/12 (0)
- RE: So... - robert26 10:34:38 06/20/12 (11)
- RE: So... - John Atkinson 10:38:45 06/20/12 (10)
- RE: So... - robert26 10:55:15 06/20/12 (9)
- RE: So... - John Atkinson 12:26:45 06/20/12 (8)
- RE: So... - Inmate51 18:16:49 06/20/12 (2)
- RE: So... - robert26 14:10:02 06/20/12 (4)
- Oh come on... - Gag Halfrunt 15:05:46 06/20/12 (3)
- RE: Oh come on... - robert26 17:30:50 06/20/12 (2)
- RE: Oh come on... - Gag Halfrunt 01:49:55 06/21/12 (1)
- Agreed, Excellent Post! (nt) - Eric B 21:41:53 07/02/12 (0)