In Reply to: Response to JA posted by Charlie8521 on February 6, 2018 at 15:21:05:
>Remember me JA now and our conversation?Yes, I do now. You proposed a $10,000 bet to me to take part in a test,
later upped to $20,000. I rejected your bet - see link below.>Z-Man Corporation, Audio Signal Enhancer(ASE).
Thank you. As you can see in the linked thread, you said that the review
sample had not been returned and that Stereophile keeping it was a theft! As
far as I can tell, the Z-Man Audio Signal Enhancer, which was reviewed in the
August 1997 issue of Stereophile by Muse Kastanovich, was returned. But also
in that thread I asked you what the product cost but you declined to reply.
John Atkinson
Technical Editor, Stereophile
Edits: 02/07/18
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- RE: Response to JA - John Atkinson 07:30:49 02/07/18 (13)
- Response to JA - Charlie8521 05:17:51 02/10/18 (12)
- RE: Response to JA - John Atkinson 06:54:33 02/10/18 (11)
- Not True JA, $5,000 Bet - Charlie8521 12:27:49 02/13/18 (10)
- RE: Not True JA, $5,000 Bet - John Atkinson 04:27:38 02/14/18 (0)
- Given that there is no reason to doubt the sincerity of either party - DAP 18:31:13 02/13/18 (8)
- The dialogue started privately with JA.... - Charlie8521 08:59:00 02/14/18 (7)
- I meant regarding whether the unit was returned/not returned - DAP 21:12:36 02/14/18 (5)
- RE: I meant regarding whether the unit was returned/not returned - Charlie8521 05:32:36 02/15/18 (4)
- RE: I meant regarding whether the unit was returned/not returned - John Atkinson 07:17:05 02/15/18 (3)
- OK JA, I'll accept that at face value,... - Charlie8521 14:13:02 02/15/18 (2)
- RE: OK JA, I'll accept that at face value,... - John Atkinson 15:48:07 02/15/18 (1)
- RE: OK JA, I'll accept that at face value,... - fantja 23:31:14 02/15/18 (0)
- RE: The dialogue started privately with JA.... - John Atkinson 11:00:49 02/14/18 (0)