In Reply to: Ummm. posted by jamesgarvin on February 5, 2018 at 14:53:27:
Hansen felt things *changed* at S'phile and said so. Was he not allowed to post here mentioning the negative changes he saw because he'd previously praised S'phile? You didn't mention what seemed to be the tipping point for Charles -- JA's MQA rave. While it may be true that getting closer to death contributed to Charles getting things off his chest, its hardly an argument that refutes what he actually said.
I saw similar negative changes in S'phile and did not renew my decades long subscription. I don't agree with every single thing Salvatore says, but there's no denying S'phile is a very different mag now compared to the publication Holt created.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Not sure what you mean. - Rick W 09:23:48 02/06/18 (8)
- RE: Not sure what you mean. - jamesgarvin 11:12:37 02/07/18 (6)
- RE: Not sure what you mean. - Rick W 13:34:37 02/07/18 (2)
- RE: Not sure what you mean. - jamesgarvin 15:08:27 02/07/18 (1)
- RE: Not sure what you mean. - Mr_Steady 11:35:05 02/08/18 (0)
- You ignore/forget . . . - Beetlemania 13:22:44 02/07/18 (2)
- RE: You ignore/forget . . . - jamesgarvin 15:00:27 02/07/18 (1)
- RE: You ignore/forget . . . - Beetlemania 19:59:13 02/07/18 (0)
- RE: Not sure what you mean. - Beetlemania 09:38:43 02/06/18 (0)