In Reply to: RE: Not sure what you mean. posted by jamesgarvin on February 7, 2018 at 11:12:37:
You provide your speculations regarding Charles' motivations but have nothing to say about the actual *content* of his criticisms of JA/S'phile - especially as related to MQA, which as I mentioned was the spark that lit Charles' fire.
To me whatever Charles' motivation was is mostly irrelevant. What matters is the content of what Charles had to say. If Hansen stifled voicing his criticisms for years due to not wanting to offend a mag wherein his products received good reviews it might negatively affect my view of him to some extent, but it'd have no bearing on whether his criticisms had merit. My view is that most of 'em did have merit.
As for Salvatore.....I don't care. I agree with some of his points, disagree with others.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- RE: Not sure what you mean. - Rick W 13:34:37 02/07/18 (2)
- RE: Not sure what you mean. - jamesgarvin 15:08:27 02/07/18 (1)
- RE: Not sure what you mean. - Mr_Steady 11:35:05 02/08/18 (0)