In Reply to: You say, "But I enjoy reading Sterephile." posted by SF tech on March 21, 2007 at 14:50:43:
In Reply to: Re: Well, your rambling troll post finally paid off... posted by Avocat on March 21, 2007 at 14:36:12:
"Then what exactly is your agenda with this post? If you were honestly just trying to convince JA to make changes to Stereophile, it could have been done by contacting him directly. Nope, you've got some other motivation... I smell troll. Why don't you just head over to The Audio Critic site? I think you'll like it there."
----------------------------------------------------------You don't like my opinions, so you want me to stop posting on Critics Corner and move over to Auto Critic? I don't think so, SF.
My initial note was a follow-on to the previous discussion of the differnces between the general policies of Consumers Report and those of current audio publications. My intent was to point out some of the underlying differences and suggest characteristics that might be expected in a user-friendly audio publication primarily devoted to helping and empowering its readers. SF, feel free to disagree with me, but don't accuse me of dishonesty.- My note expressed my own opinions, and concerns, about the matter.
What's my agenda? - Expressing my own views, eliciting some interesting discussion, and perhaps moving the general consensus in a slightly different direction. (Correct me if I'm wrong, but that's what I thought was generally expected on CC.) I obviously have little direct influence on the policies of SF, but it does seem that they follow the gist of such online discussions. Incidentally, I note that the opinions expressed in several of the follow-ups don't exactly conform to your opinions or JA's or to the SF surveys.
Jim
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Re: You say, "But I enjoy reading Sterephile." - Avocat 13:45:43 03/22/07 (6)
- Here's the problem... - SF tech 16:26:41 03/22/07 (5)
- Re: Here's the problem... - Avocat 19:19:12 03/22/07 (3)
- Let's keep it civil, OK? - SF tech 20:05:01 03/22/07 (2)
- Re: Let's keep it civil, OK? Agreed. - Avocat 10:13:58 03/23/07 (1)
- "This is not questioning my integrity?" - SF tech 11:58:54 03/23/07 (0)
- Seconded. -t - Bruce Kendall 18:22:31 03/22/07 (0)