In Reply to: The Inquisition Continues posted by John Atkinson on March 22, 2007 at 08:03:58:
John
I have been a Sterophile subscriber for almost 15 years (I also subscribe to other publications and read all of the online pubs)I remember some of you blind tests. I believe some were with a panel that all listened together and then each was assigned a speaker to report on sighted.
Wasn't the panel test skewed by only one person being able to sit in the right spot? (I understand doing other wise would be a hassle)
Were the levels matched precisely system to system?
Personally I would prefer a compromise of some sort. Logistically doing blind tests for everything can be a nightmare and would slow down the process. As such it's really not practical. Having said that I would like to see some way of blind testing speakers to see if the responses to the sighted reviews hold true. Maybe a sampling once a year? The reason I suggest this is cost. I would like to hear a reviewer critique speakers based on several common parameters and then suggest what price range they feel that quality of sound could substaniate. Of all the arguements the ABX people make I think the one regarding cost is the most relevant. I think one expects certain capabilities when they know how much something costs. I think it's human nature to want to be able to give a favorable review of someone else's life's work - especially when they are extremely expensive to desin and manufacture. (I experiance the same thing when i buy something or try a tweek. You find yourself wanting to support your own decision). As such I think - especially with speakers- a yearly calibration would be of some use. (Given the decline of high end audio it is virtually impossible for the average person to listen to even a fraction of what is available or recommended. As such - while your recommend people listen on their own and don't buy based on your reviews - it is often practical to do just that - as there is really no other choice. I bought Triangle speakers based on Sam review and the fact that I own tubes. When I did this there was no one within 250 miles that was selling them)
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Re: The Inquisition Continues - imispgh@yahoo.com 11:06:26 03/22/07 (31)
- Re: The Inquisition Continues - John Atkinson 04:15:49 03/23/07 (30)
- Re: The Inquisition Continues - theaudiohobby 18:31:54 03/24/07 (29)
- Re: The Inquisition Continues - John Atkinson 04:31:07 03/25/07 (28)
- Re: The Inquisition Continues - theaudiohobby 10:43:35 03/25/07 (27)
- Re: The Inquisition Continues - John Atkinson 15:56:20 03/25/07 (26)
- Re: The Inquisition Continues - theaudiohobby 01:34:45 03/26/07 (25)
- So, what conclusion can you draw - E-Stat 05:07:26 03/26/07 (24)
- Re: That question has been answered. - theaudiohobby 05:28:15 03/26/07 (23)
- What makes you think that Mr. Atkinson's - E-Stat 05:41:22 03/26/07 (22)
- Re: What makes you think that Mr. Atkinson's - theaudiohobby 07:35:55 03/26/07 (21)
- Re: What makes you think that Mr. Atkinson's - John Atkinson 11:14:34 03/26/07 (13)
- Re: It does not work that way... - theaudiohobby 03:35:12 03/27/07 (12)
- Re: It does not work that way... - John Atkinson 03:55:56 03/27/07 (11)
- C'mon, John - E-Stat 07:16:27 03/27/07 (7)
- Re: C'mon, John - theaudiohobby 11:39:05 03/27/07 (5)
- I didn't have any questions for Mr. Atkinson - E-Stat 17:35:12 03/27/07 (4)
- Re: I didn't have any questions for Mr. Atkinson - theaudiohobby 18:59:11 03/27/07 (3)
- I would say facetious, not malicious. - robert young 15:51:36 03/29/07 (2)
- Thank you - E-Stat 16:21:49 03/29/07 (1)
- You're welcome. - robert young 18:54:40 03/29/07 (0)
- Re: C'mon, John - kerr 07:36:55 03/27/07 (0)
- Re: It does not work that way... - theaudiohobby 04:42:55 03/27/07 (2)
- Re: It does not work that way... - John Atkinson 13:14:34 03/27/07 (1)
- Re: It does not work that way... - Avocat 15:18:43 04/01/07 (0)
- The answer being - E-Stat 07:40:54 03/26/07 (6)
- Re: The answer being - theaudiohobby 09:07:46 03/26/07 (5)
- So which is it - answer the question... - mkuller 14:14:02 03/26/07 (4)
- On a related topic... - E-Stat 16:12:37 03/26/07 (3)
- Re: On a related topic... - kerr 04:52:15 03/27/07 (2)
- Yes, Ms. Loken is a fine example - E-Stat 06:04:57 03/27/07 (1)
- A. Slim and None - kerr 06:35:17 03/27/07 (0)