Re: Unfortunately, he doesn't seem to be kidding! - Pat D

Follow Ups Full Thread

Topic - HE2005: The Great Debate - John Atkinson 20:35:12 05/08/05 (131)

Well done, sir - E-Stat 14:17:27 05/11/05 (42)

Re: Well done, sir - toxicport.e 14:53:58 05/11/05 (41)

Like Hell we don't test like that! - rcrump 16:18:26 05/12/05 (0)

Re: Well done, sir - Pat D 11:01:11 05/12/05 (39)

You can check with him... - mkuller 10:43:32 05/14/05 (17)

Re: You can check with him... - Pat D 09:49:09 05/15/05 (16)

Far cry or nearly the same? - mkuller 11:31:41 05/15/05 (15)

Re: Far cry or nearly the same? - bjh 16:30:59 05/15/05 (14)

Funny--I seem to have gotten him to admit my point. - Pat D 19:33:44 05/15/05 (13)

What point? - mkuller 09:56:00 05/16/05 (11)

Re: What point? - Pat D 13:44:09 05/16/05 (9)

For all practical purposes... - mkuller 14:10:28 05/16/05 (8)

Inventing your own logic? - Pat D 14:19:15 05/16/05 (7)

Re: Inventing your own logic? - bjh 14:46:12 05/16/05 (6)

Re: Inventing your own logic? - Pat D 14:59:18 05/16/05 (5)

What are you saying Pat? - bjh 15:19:42 05/16/05 (4)

Oh come now! - Pat D 18:13:56 05/16/05 (3)

False Prophet - bjh 23:03:08 05/16/05 (2)

I never pretended to be a prophet! - Pat D 07:59:58 05/17/05 (1)

Re: I never pretended to be a prophet! - bjh 09:09:26 05/17/05 (0)

Re: What point? - kerr 13:41:58 05/16/05 (0)

Re: Funny--I seem to have gotten him to admit my point. - bjh 20:48:27 05/15/05 (0)

I'll be happy to quote him directly - E-Stat 19:51:00 05/12/05 (12)

You need to review your logical quantifiers. - Pat D 20:41:26 05/12/05 (11)

Then what? - E-Stat 04:43:16 05/13/05 (10)

Re: Then what? - Pat D 09:32:09 05/13/05 (9)

You're a trip, Pat :) - E-Stat 09:54:24 05/13/05 (0)

Re: Then what? - bjh 09:41:19 05/13/05 (7)

Re: Then what? - Pat D 15:02:40 05/13/05 (6)

Re: Then what? - bjh 16:25:39 05/13/05 (5)

More bad logic. - Pat D 21:08:14 05/13/05 (4)

You continue to miss my point - E-Stat 04:43:42 05/14/05 (3)

How many times are you planning to repeat your entirely obvious point ? - bjh 05:42:36 05/14/05 (1)

You're right - E-Stat 06:38:28 05/14/05 (0)

You have a point? - Pat D 05:34:10 05/14/05 (0)

Re: Well done, sir - toxicport.e 16:25:22 05/12/05 (7)

A straw amplifier? - John Atkinson 04:54:24 05/13/05 (5)

Re: A straw amplifier? - john curl 10:01:20 05/13/05 (2)

Memories (sniff) - E-Stat 12:20:45 05/13/05 (1)

Re: Memories (sniff) - John Atkinson 16:21:14 05/13/05 (0)

Straw amps? - jbmcb 06:47:02 05/13/05 (1)

Re: Straw amps? - bjh 07:48:53 05/13/05 (0)

Re: Well done, sir - john curl 16:54:37 05/12/05 (0)

Hey John . . . - Pjay 11:03:43 05/09/05 (0)

Seriously though ... - kerameikos 10:38:23 05/09/05 (0)

Re: HE2005: The Great Debate - Pat D 10:29:10 05/09/05 (68)

We already knew what you think... - mkuller 11:05:43 05/09/05 (67)

Yes indeed, - bjh 07:50:27 05/10/05 (3)

LOL - Pat D 18:34:34 05/10/05 (2)

Re: LOL - bjh 20:08:39 05/10/05 (1)

Re: LOL - Pat D 20:43:29 05/10/05 (0)

Re: We already knew what you think... - theaudiohobby 01:29:40 05/10/05 (23)

Unfortunately, he doesn't seem to be kidding! - Pat D 07:30:48 05/10/05 (22)

Re: Unfortunately, he doesn't seem to be kidding! - john curl 21:14:11 05/11/05 (21)

Re: Unfortunately, he doesn't seem to be kidding! - theaudiohobby 00:25:01 05/12/05 (20)

Proof and perception - Jim Austin 17:38:28 05/12/05 (6)

Re: Proof and perception - theaudiohobby 01:54:56 05/13/05 (1)

Re: Proof and perception - Jim Austin 04:39:47 05/13/05 (0)

Re: Proof and perception - bjh 19:41:56 05/12/05 (2)

Re: Proof and perception - john curl 20:33:45 05/12/05 (1)

Re: Proof and perception - bjh 04:50:03 05/13/05 (0)

Re: Proof and perception - john curl 19:10:26 05/12/05 (0)

Re: Unfortunately, he doesn't seem to be kidding! - bjh 05:59:40 05/12/05 (12)

Re: Unfortunately, he doesn't seem to be kidding! - theaudiohobby 01:51:12 05/13/05 (3)

Who's kidding whom? - mkuller 14:39:01 05/13/05 (0)

Re: Unfortunately, he doesn't seem to be kidding! - bjh 04:48:26 05/13/05 (1)

Re: Unfortunately, he doesn't seem to be kidding! - theaudiohobby 19:26:32 05/13/05 (0)

Re: Unfortunately, he doesn't seem to be kidding! - Pat D 20:37:04 05/12/05 (7)

Re: Unfortunately, he doesn't seem to be kidding! - bjh 05:00:13 05/13/05 (6)

Re: Unfortunately, he doesn't seem to be kidding! - Pat D 20:24:19 05/13/05 (5)

Re: Unfortunately, he doesn't seem to be kidding! - kerr 20:41:56 05/14/05 (4)

Re: Unfortunately, he doesn't seem to be kidding! - Pat D 18:18:38 05/16/05 (3)

Re: Unfortunately, he doesn't seem to be kidding! - kerr 05:47:25 05/17/05 (2)

Re: Unfortunately, he doesn't seem to be kidding! - Pat D 08:29:39 05/17/05 (1)

Re: Unfortunately, he doesn't seem to be kidding! - kerr 09:00:03 05/17/05 (0)

Sorry, you miss the point. - Pat D 18:17:09 05/09/05 (38)

Re: "Such things are basically audio jewellery with no proven audible benefits beyond much less expensive products." - Bruce from DC 06:37:11 05/11/05 (6)

Re: "Such things are basically audio jewellery with no proven audible benefits beyond much less expensive products." - Pat D 20:00:33 05/11/05 (3)

Re: "Such things are basically audio jewellery with no proven audible benefits beyond much less expensive products." - regmac 08:29:25 05/12/05 (0)

Sorry you chose not to answer my question (nt) - Bruce from DC 06:14:00 05/12/05 (1)

Sorry you can't read. - Pat D 06:51:23 05/12/05 (0)

Re: "Such things are basically audio jewellery with no proven audible benefits beyond much less expensive products." - bjh 08:29:49 05/11/05 (1)

But it's so HARD to do a speaker DBT.... - mkuller 13:29:34 05/11/05 (1)

Sorry I made your knee jerk... - mkuller 16:14:13 05/10/05 (19)

Why don't you tell us what you really mean? - Pat D 20:34:41 05/10/05 (18)

Ok, let me draw you a picture... - mkuller 11:23:34 05/11/05 (17)

Here's some expert opinion . . . - Pat D 20:37:19 05/11/05 (16)

In my exchanges with jj... - mkuller 11:01:47 05/14/05 (7)

Re: In my exchanges with jj... - Pat D 08:47:15 05/16/05 (6)

DBTs with music... - mkuller 10:51:19 05/16/05 (5)

Re: DBTs with music... - kerr 13:43:57 05/16/05 (4)

Re: DBTs with music... - Pat D 14:33:35 05/16/05 (3)

Re: DBTs with music... - kerr 15:11:41 05/16/05 (2)

Re: DBTs with music... - Pat D 18:11:51 05/16/05 (1)

Re: DBTs with music... - kerr 05:34:35 05/17/05 (0)

Well, his opinion is as good as anyone's... - kerr 05:42:48 05/13/05 (7)

Now, there's a nub of the question, honestly stated. - Pat D 09:21:43 05/13/05 (6)

Here's a reliable method for choosing the best sounding stuff... - mkuller 11:09:45 05/13/05 (4)

Not even professional reviewers can listen to everything. - Pat D 15:08:28 05/13/05 (1)

You missed the point...again... - mkuller 11:48:37 05/15/05 (0)

It also includes regular refreshes - E-Stat 14:47:21 05/13/05 (0)

Yes. I should have been more clear. - kerr 12:31:51 05/13/05 (0)

I appreciate your POV... - kerr 10:24:20 05/13/05 (0)

Re: Sorry, you miss the point. - kerr 05:55:05 05/10/05 (5)

STOP MAKING SENSE! It's a waste of flame space. nt - clarkjohnsen 07:18:29 05/10/05 (4)

But I have no objection to people forming preferences. (nt) - Pat D 07:26:26 05/10/05 (3)

Preferences - kerr 10:10:27 05/10/05 (0)

Thas' mighty white a'ya... nt - clarkjohnsen 07:47:51 05/10/05 (1)

Same to you, Clark. (nt) - Pat D 20:44:20 05/10/05 (0)

Expensive - that depends....... - JohnL 20:34:33 05/09/05 (4)

It's expensive - Pat D 07:23:03 05/10/05 (3)

Fair dinkum------ - JohnL 17:15:38 05/10/05 (2)

You need some logic: whole, part, none, some, every. - Pat D 18:29:07 05/10/05 (1)

Agreed - kerr 05:52:20 05/11/05 (0)

Re: HE2005: The Great Debate - kerameikos 09:03:10 05/09/05 (6)

Re: HE2005: The Great Debate - John Atkinson 11:09:43 05/09/05 (5)

Re: HE2005: The Great Debate - tavegia@bellsouth.net 14:32:03 05/10/05 (0)

Huh! here's another ex-stutterer. Interesting story... - clarkjohnsen 07:24:24 05/10/05 (2)

Re: Huh! here's another ex-stutterer. Interesting story... - John Atkinson 19:20:33 05/10/05 (1)

Easy, boy! Not saying *I* recommend it -- - clarkjohnsen 08:25:50 05/11/05 (0)

I thought it was just a regional accent! (nt) - kerameikos 11:36:15 05/09/05 (0)

Re: HE2005: The Debate - Kloss 07:59:52 05/09/05 (0)

I missed a scream? DARN! nt - Pjay 04:43:51 05/09/05 (0)

Re: HE2005: The Great Debate - toxicport.e 02:39:35 05/09/05 (7)

Try this - kerr 08:56:22 05/09/05 (6)

Re: Try this - toxicport.e 18:02:10 05/09/05 (0)

Re: Try this - jamesgarvin 11:49:33 05/09/05 (4)

Re: Try this - kerr 13:03:12 05/09/05 (3)

Re: Try this - jamesgarvin 13:28:46 05/09/05 (2)

Re: Try this - kerr 13:46:05 05/09/05 (1)

Re: Try this - toxicport.e 17:58:53 05/09/05 (0)

Follow Ups

Re: Unfortunately, he doesn't seem to be kidding! - Pat D 18:18:38 05/16/05 (3)

Re: Unfortunately, he doesn't seem to be kidding! - kerr 05:47:25 05/17/05 (2)

Re: Unfortunately, he doesn't seem to be kidding! - Pat D 08:29:39 05/17/05 (1)

Re: Unfortunately, he doesn't seem to be kidding! - kerr 09:00:03 05/17/05 (0)