Objectivists will have to move on to Plan B.

Follow Ups Full Thread

Topic - Speaker Cable Differences Measured - Jon Risch 17:38:12 05/26/10 (330)

Risch says - Kristian 14:40:31 07/01/10 (0)

Is there a reason why we should care? - Don Till 08:48:43 06/03/10 (101)

No reason to care unless you buy things - tomservo 07:12:10 06/04/10 (81)

RE: No reason to care unless you buy things - Jon Risch 10:58:37 06/06/10 (12)

RE: No reason to care unless you buy things - tomservo 14:40:08 06/13/10 (0)

You're right such test don't mean anything - Don Till 21:16:54 06/08/10 (0)

RE: No reason to care unless you buy things - mls-stl 12:49:19 06/06/10 (9)

I asked this before, but let me try again - how is that "cumulative evidence",... - carcass93 08:47:18 06/09/10 (2)

You're misreading my comment - mls-stl 14:48:00 06/09/10 (1)

RE: You're misreading my comment - kerr 07:20:40 06/10/10 (0)

Evidence? - Jon Risch 19:12:07 06/08/10 (5)

RE: Evidence? - mls-stl 05:46:35 06/09/10 (4)

What is well established in all other areas of science is the wildly variable influence of of subjective facto - Norm 14:05:09 06/09/10 (3)

RE: What is well established in all other areas of science is the wildly variable influence of of subjective facto - mls-stl 16:53:12 06/09/10 (1)

I might suggest some problems I have with what you say but totally agree with your last statement. - Norm 14:26:01 06/11/10 (0)

RE: What is well established in all other areas of science is the wildly variable influence of of subjective facto - Tony Lauck 14:31:48 06/09/10 (0)

RE: No reason to care unless you buy things - Presto 10:35:35 06/05/10 (1)

RE: No reason to care unless you buy things - Pat D 16:16:37 06/05/10 (0)

nice response - Don Till 09:55:03 06/05/10 (65)

RE: nice response - Tony Lauck 11:49:47 06/05/10 (64)

RE: nice response - Pat D 15:54:39 06/05/10 (36)

RE: nice response - Tony Lauck 18:45:35 06/05/10 (35)

How rich can it get? - Don Till 07:49:11 06/06/10 (34)

"As if one might not find a woman beautiful because of her intelligence." - robert young 10:11:20 06/06/10 (33)

It's exactly on topic and to the point of contention - Don Till 10:43:34 06/06/10 (32)

It may be "on topic" but it demonstrates.... - robert young 14:14:13 06/06/10 (31)

Maybe you can just move on.... - Don Till 12:39:45 06/08/10 (30)

Are you really this clueless, or do you just play so on propheads? - robert young 13:03:48 06/08/10 (29)

Read this - I haven't decided if you really this dense or trying to get some payback for being made of fool on - Don Till 13:14:05 06/08/10 (28)

Your subject line isn't even coherent english... - robert young 06:54:38 06/09/10 (4)

This is my last effort to help you - if you still don't "get it" just move on. - Don Till 08:35:50 06/09/10 (3)

Another Don T epic fail.... - robert young 10:21:29 06/09/10 (2)

I get it. You made up a topic and have been fooling me into thinking you were trying to join in on this one! - Don Till 12:40:59 06/09/10 (1)

No need for me to continue to point out your ignorance. - robert young 13:23:49 06/09/10 (0)

Funny... - Tony Lauck 13:59:02 06/08/10 (22)

Unfortunately.... - Don Till 21:01:44 06/08/10 (20)

clueless - Tony Lauck 07:11:23 06/09/10 (19)

So? - Don Till 08:12:27 06/09/10 (18)

RE: So? - Tony Lauck 08:42:47 06/09/10 (17)

Not really Tony... - Don Till 08:49:29 06/09/10 (16)

Hysterical!! - robert young 10:25:58 06/09/10 (0)

I already agreed with you.... - Tony Lauck 09:03:52 06/09/10 (14)

I know you said that you agree with me but I don't agree with you. - Don Till 12:57:23 06/09/10 (13)

Clearly we disagree about agreement. - Tony Lauck 13:56:52 06/09/10 (12)

Like that TT that picks up voices spoken in the listening room your amp is broken.... - Don Till 08:49:24 06/17/10 (7)

It seems you simply can't comprehend what you read. - robert young 12:02:00 06/17/10 (6)

Logical Boostrap Problem - Tony Lauck 12:52:10 06/17/10 (5)

No it's a programming error - Don Till 19:23:11 06/17/10 (3)

That analogy is so tortured.... - robert young 13:26:26 06/18/10 (2)

THE MOMMY RETURNS! - Don Till 10:10:33 06/20/10 (1)

Weak, but not unexpected. - robert young 19:49:59 06/20/10 (0)

Do you remember the great Python skit... - robert young 13:31:26 06/17/10 (0)

Sure..... - Don Till 21:12:55 06/11/10 (3)

RE: Sure..... - Tony Lauck 06:05:40 06/12/10 (2)

No Tony - Don Till 16:51:53 06/16/10 (1)

Must be some big conspiracy of stoopud that keeps everyone from falling into line with your "reasoning." - robert young 18:20:28 06/16/10 (0)

Good point - E-Stat 14:24:00 06/08/10 (0)

Well said! - E-Stat 12:09:48 06/05/10 (26)

Maybe you can clarify what's so well about it? - Don Till 13:44:43 06/05/10 (25)

My suggestion to you - E-Stat 14:54:52 06/05/10 (24)

Come now E-Stat - Don Till 17:04:19 06/05/10 (21)

At the expense of confusing the issue with facts - E-Stat 19:39:40 06/05/10 (20)

RE: At the expense of confusing the issue with facts - Don Till 07:29:42 06/06/10 (19)

The *someone* - E-Stat 08:55:55 06/06/10 (18)

Technical dimension? - Don Till 13:22:09 06/08/10 (10)

Do you need assistance understanding the term "recording engineer"? -nt - E-Stat 13:40:20 06/08/10 (9)

He's still pimping his stuff - duh! - Don Till 21:08:52 06/08/10 (8)

Regardless of your insults - E-Stat 05:57:56 06/09/10 (7)

Well then what's their take? - Don Till 08:10:34 06/09/10 (6)

What is their take? - E-Stat 08:24:50 06/09/10 (5)

Ok then why the applaud for the original comment? - Don Till 08:47:10 06/09/10 (4)

Evidently - E-Stat 09:03:57 06/09/10 (3)

You need to tie these spectra to resolution* independent of noise in order for your comment to be relative - Don Till 12:34:24 06/09/10 (2)

Yes, kids it's another episode of... - E-Stat 13:37:08 06/09/10 (1)

You didn't bother making an excuse, I apologize I thought you might try to avoid this kind of name calling... - Don Till 21:19:09 06/11/10 (0)

That's laughable! - Don Till 10:07:05 06/06/10 (6)

Reading retention=zero - E-Stat 10:46:38 06/06/10 (5)

Giving you the benefit of the doubt you must have forgotten what we were talking about! - Don Till 11:32:01 06/06/10 (4)

Not at all - E-Stat 12:59:29 06/06/10 (3)

You've answered nothing - Don Till 12:44:53 06/08/10 (2)

When all else fails, deny everything! :) -nt - E-Stat 12:45:53 06/08/10 (1)

I'm not denying anything - you're the one posting smoke! - Don Till 13:02:29 06/08/10 (0)

RE: My suggestion to you - Pat D 16:01:10 06/05/10 (1)

May you enjoy you lack of awareness -nt - E-Stat 19:38:10 06/05/10 (0)

"Backasswards and ugly?" - E-Stat 11:40:42 06/03/10 (18)

If I didn't know better... - kerr 17:20:09 06/03/10 (17)

That boulder will turn to gold - just ask an alchemist. You probably should help it somewhat though. N/T - carcass93 19:16:34 06/03/10 (16)

Those expensive interconnects and cables have turned to gold for the sellers! (nt) - Pat D 04:40:27 06/04/10 (15)

You think so, huh? Is that they're all going out of business? - Sordidman 10:18:14 06/07/10 (8)

Well in a down economy people don't have money to easily part with - Don Till 12:53:37 06/08/10 (5)

Didn't say that: clearly. - Sordidman 13:54:47 06/08/10 (4)

True you asked why they were going out of business - I tried to answer. - Don Till 21:33:56 06/08/10 (3)

Yes, Thanks, I wasn't seriously asking: for even PatD knows - Sordidman 16:50:21 06/09/10 (2)

Sorry, but selling an audio cable for several thousand dollars is lucrative. - Pat D 16:56:23 06/20/10 (1)

Not if all of the company's are not selling them, and not staying in business -t - Sordidman 16:06:49 06/25/10 (0)

Yep - just a bad habit of whining about something he has nothing to do with. - carcass93 14:24:11 06/07/10 (1)

RE: Yep - just a bad habit of whining about something he has nothing to do with. - kerr 07:18:31 06/08/10 (0)

Here's paradox: - carcass93 10:17:53 06/04/10 (5)

We've all heard those Chinese DVD players - E-Stat 14:48:10 06/04/10 (1)

I held out for the SD4900 - Presto 15:38:55 06/04/10 (0)

RE: Here's paradox: - kerr 10:49:18 06/04/10 (2)

RE: Here's paradox: - tomservo 12:49:28 06/04/10 (1)

RE: Here's paradox: - kerr 15:33:10 06/04/10 (0)

Poop Heads - briggs 07:01:57 06/03/10 (2)

RE: Poop Heads - tomservo 09:09:08 06/04/10 (1)

RE: Poop Heads - kerr 10:48:11 06/04/10 (0)

Jon, thanks for a great thread for PHP! - kerr 04:44:15 06/03/10 (3)

Yes, there is agreement - E-Stat 06:55:40 06/03/10 (2)

RE: Yes, there is agreement - kerr 08:18:24 06/03/10 (1)

Indeed :) -nt - E-Stat 08:33:18 06/03/10 (0)

Strange - gymwear5@hotmail.com 08:45:24 06/01/10 (1)

RE: Strange - Jon Risch 19:29:18 06/01/10 (0)

RE: Speaker Cable Differences Measured - Cleantimestream 11:53:00 05/29/10 (7)

Exactly. This is what I was saying... - Presto 21:24:52 05/29/10 (6)

Yes but no.... - Don Till 07:35:50 05/31/10 (5)

RE: Yes but no.... - Presto 11:04:57 05/31/10 (4)

RE: Yes but no.... - mls-stl 14:12:09 06/01/10 (1)

RE: Yes but no.... - Tony Lauck 08:00:27 06/03/10 (0)

Well I admit.... - Don Till 16:05:16 05/31/10 (0)

RE: Yes but no.... - kerr 13:36:55 05/31/10 (0)

Thanks for the posting. You can see that it will have no impact. Facts don't matter in faith discussions. nt - Norm 08:16:59 05/29/10 (11)

RE: Thanks for the posting. You can see that it will have no impact. Facts don't matter in faith discussions. nt - tomservo 09:39:59 06/04/10 (0)

Aren't you basing your statement on YOUR faith in the person taking the measurements, the equipment used... - artemus 10:45:23 05/30/10 (8)

Science is a faith in data, transparency of method, and replication. - Norm 06:31:41 05/31/10 (7)

RE: Science is a faith in data, transparency of method, and replication. - Tony Lauck 15:43:15 05/31/10 (6)

Yes,there is much that is very important that we cannot measure. - Norm 14:46:52 06/07/10 (5)

RE: Yes,there is much that is very important that we cannot measure. - rick_m 08:23:18 06/10/10 (0)

Oh but we can measure it. - morricab 03:08:49 06/08/10 (2)

I think virtually everyone now finds THD useless. nt - Norm 14:07:32 06/09/10 (1)

RE: I think virtually everyone now finds THD useless. nt - morricab 14:33:09 06/10/10 (0)

RE: Yes,there is much that is very important that we cannot measure. - Tony Lauck 14:53:58 06/07/10 (0)

Hah hah hah hah hah hha aahhhhhh wtf. who cares.... - Elizabeth 08:43:44 05/30/10 (0)

I find it sort of funny.... - Presto 17:51:00 05/28/10 (78)

So, all the measuress you took to eliminate gross inadequacies... - carcass93 08:51:30 06/01/10 (1)

RE: So, all the measuress you took to eliminate gross inadequacies... - Presto 16:23:26 06/04/10 (0)

RE: I find it sort of funny.... - benie 19:13:50 05/29/10 (15)

Well, - Presto 20:52:51 05/29/10 (14)

RE: Well, - benie 03:38:44 05/30/10 (13)

But you make it sound... - Presto 19:33:21 05/30/10 (12)

RE: But you make it sound... - benie 22:21:02 05/30/10 (11)

RE: But you make it sound... - tomservo 16:19:11 06/04/10 (3)

RE: But you make it sound... - benie 17:12:37 06/04/10 (2)

RE: But you make it sound... - tomservo 17:28:27 06/04/10 (1)

RE: But you make it sound... - benie 02:30:27 06/06/10 (0)

Well, if you don't post any more you can't learn - Presto 08:46:16 05/31/10 (6)

RE: Well, if you don't post any more you can't learn - Davey 09:45:50 05/31/10 (5)

RE: Well, if you don't post any more you can't learn - Presto 11:00:06 05/31/10 (4)

Ring dome tweeters - caspian@peak.org 18:10:26 05/31/10 (1)

RE: Ring dome tweeters - Presto 09:45:32 06/03/10 (0)

RE: Well, if you don't post any more you can't learn - Davey 17:38:01 05/31/10 (1)

RE: Well, if you don't post any more you can't learn - Tony Lauck 06:54:02 06/03/10 (0)

You can easily save yourself from tweak insanity; don't buy any. But why do you think you should tell others?* - Norm 08:14:33 05/29/10 (8)

Why to subjectivists insist on telling others about their illusions? - Pat D 09:48:05 05/30/10 (6)

"Hoist on your own petard????" Hardly! - Norm 20:21:56 06/17/10 (0)

I've only shared two illusions on this site (so far) - kerr 09:46:16 06/01/10 (0)

Why do pathological objectionists insist on projecting their hearing and/or... - carcass93 08:56:24 06/01/10 (3)

Umm . . . the trick doesn't work so well after everyone has seen it. - Pat D 14:40:29 06/01/10 (2)

No idea what you're referring to, but here's my best guess: - carcass93 15:00:14 06/01/10 (1)

See! I told you, but . . . (nt) - Pat D 15:18:08 06/01/10 (0)

RE: You can easily save yourself from tweak insanity; don't buy any. But why do you think you should tell others?* - Presto 20:50:39 05/29/10 (0)

RE: I find it sort of funny.... - KlausR. 22:13:27 05/28/10 (50)

RE: I find it sort of funny.... - Presto 01:09:02 05/29/10 (49)

I just used single driver loudspeakers - morricab 05:38:23 06/02/10 (0)

RE: I find it sort of funny.... - KlausR. 10:41:39 05/29/10 (47)

RE: I find it sort of funny.... - Presto 21:21:46 05/29/10 (46)

Re: so I don't think I can exchange with you on an eye-to-eye level - KlausR. 10:20:07 05/30/10 (45)

You've opened a marvelous worm can here... - Presto 19:41:16 05/30/10 (44)

Flat anechoically or in room? - morricab 05:26:16 06/03/10 (0)

Opening worm cans is a specialty of mine! - KlausR. 21:56:32 05/31/10 (42)

RE: Opening worm cans is a specialty of mine! - Tony Lauck 07:18:13 06/03/10 (39)

RE: systems that measure flat at their listening position - KlausR. 00:55:19 06/04/10 (38)

That's great... - E-Stat 12:12:16 06/05/10 (0)

RE: systems that measure flat at their listening position - tomservo 16:35:55 06/04/10 (1)

RE: systems that measure flat at their listening position - KlausR. 23:23:47 06/05/10 (0)

RE: systems that measure flat at their listening position - Tony Lauck 06:40:14 06/04/10 (34)

"measuring flat" is Klaus' intolerant straw man - Sordidman 16:18:02 06/04/10 (33)

So having preferences different from yours constitutes "intolerance" and "blind arrogance?" (nt) - Pat D 16:05:45 06/05/10 (32)

Nope, blind faith in poor measurements and denigrating experience does -t - Sordidman 10:54:25 06/07/10 (31)

Measurements work for KlausR. What's your problem? - Pat D 16:46:00 06/07/10 (30)

Misreading again? I said, nor implied nothing of the kind - Sordidman 10:45:25 06/08/10 (29)

RE: erroneous conclusions - KlausR. 04:38:42 06/09/10 (26)

""which criteria happened to be non-subjective"" - Sordidman 16:55:14 06/09/10 (23)

RE: ""which criteria happened to be non-subjective"" - Tony Lauck 08:37:28 06/10/10 (1)

Design as you go; then make adjustments - Sordidman 09:40:58 06/10/10 (0)

RE: Good sound is the goal, and it is entirely subjective. - KlausR. 21:55:21 06/09/10 (20)

It's either a "fact" or it isn't - Sordidman 09:32:46 06/10/10 (19)

There is no defintion for art, but audio definitely is not art! - KlausR. 22:04:28 06/10/10 (18)

Not your decision: Art is whatever any artist says it is.... - Sordidman 09:40:23 06/11/10 (17)

RE: That is clearly crap - KlausR. 13:38:08 06/12/10 (9)

Case Closed? Not -- I doubt it will ever be closed. - Tony Lauck 10:39:18 06/13/10 (8)

Meyer/Moran threads - KlausR. 08:19:20 06/14/10 (7)

RE: Meyer/Moran threads - Tony Lauck 08:46:22 06/14/10 (6)

RE: I don't know why you didn't find my posts - KlausR. 14:01:54 06/14/10 (5)

RE: I don't know why you didn't find my posts - Tony Lauck 15:08:58 06/14/10 (4)

RE: I have faith in Brad's personal integrity - KlausR. 02:47:48 06/15/10 (3)

RE: I have faith in Brad's personal integrity - Tony Lauck 08:58:27 06/15/10 (2)

Some (final) points - KlausR. 09:13:40 06/16/10 (1)

RE: Some (final) points - Tony Lauck 09:41:45 06/16/10 (0)

RE: Not your decision: Art is whatever any artist says it is.... - Tony Lauck 11:09:54 06/11/10 (6)

Accuracy? - Sordidman 12:24:33 06/11/10 (5)

RE: Accuracy? - Tony Lauck 13:16:58 06/11/10 (4)

There's a lot of anger out there.......... - Sordidman 14:25:35 06/11/10 (3)

RE: There's a lot of anger out there.......... - Tony Lauck 15:04:29 06/11/10 (2)

RE: There's a lot of anger out there.......... - Sordidman 15:43:42 06/11/10 (1)

RE: There's a lot of anger out there.......... - Tony Lauck 17:33:16 06/11/10 (0)

RE: erroneous conclusions - Tony Lauck 07:42:27 06/09/10 (1)

RE: Conflict - KlausR. 21:31:00 06/09/10 (0)

You just illustrated what I said! (nt) - Pat D 14:47:31 06/08/10 (1)

No, but Whatever: time to get off the schoolyard (nt) - Sordidman 16:02:20 06/08/10 (0)

On flat response... - Presto 10:18:29 06/01/10 (1)

Agreement on all points (nt) - KlausR. 07:34:29 06/02/10 (0)

Why, does - tesla 16:29:32 05/28/10 (0)

Objectivists will have to move on to Plan B. - Enophile 22:33:10 05/27/10 (39)

No plan B needed, actually! - KlausR. 01:04:44 05/28/10 (38)

Since you only measure and never listen, - how do you know what's - Sordidman 11:27:25 06/02/10 (37)

RE: Since you only measure and never listen, - how do you know what's audible or not? - KlausR. 00:54:38 06/03/10 (36)

Denialists must prove DOES NOT - Tony Lauck 07:56:02 06/03/10 (35)

Nonsense. - Pat D 11:26:42 06/03/10 (33)

Easy answer - E-Stat 14:26:18 06/03/10 (32)

Way too easy. - Pat D 15:20:36 06/03/10 (31)

I agree - E-Stat 15:23:07 06/03/10 (30)

He asked it because he IS... you know... N/T - carcass93 19:13:53 06/03/10 (29)

You guys should argue this with Dan Banquer. - Pat D 19:25:32 06/03/10 (28)

I always defer to the opinion of - E-Stat 19:28:16 06/03/10 (27)

RE: I always defer to the opinion of - Pat D 20:01:54 06/03/10 (26)

RE Designs was a one trick pony - E-Stat 06:24:30 06/04/10 (25)

So you also want to take on jneutron? - Pat D 10:57:38 06/04/10 (24)

I agree with what JNeutron said, too! - E-Stat 12:20:54 06/04/10 (23)

RE: I agree with what JNeutron said, too! - Pat D 13:08:43 06/04/10 (22)

I'll help you out - E-Stat 13:21:13 06/04/10 (21)

RE: I'll help you out - Pat D 16:11:12 06/04/10 (20)

Who are you quoting now? - E-Stat 16:54:30 06/04/10 (19)

RE: Who are you quoting now? - Pat D 10:39:32 06/05/10 (18)

You continue to miss the point - E-Stat 11:45:02 06/05/10 (17)

RE: You continue to miss the point - Pat D 14:21:53 06/05/10 (16)

I give up on your ability - E-Stat 14:57:00 06/05/10 (15)

The concept is easy--but you haven't established its applicability. - Pat D 07:58:15 06/07/10 (14)

Are you just realizing this? - E-Stat 08:31:00 06/07/10 (13)

Ummm . . . - Pat D 10:39:11 06/07/10 (12)

Boy, you've steered so far off the original course! - E-Stat 11:43:14 06/07/10 (11)

Your course is confused. - Pat D 15:27:24 06/07/10 (10)

Time to step back and review your comments :) - E-Stat 06:34:19 06/08/10 (9)

It's time for you to stop quoting snippets with no context. - Pat D 07:46:22 06/08/10 (8)

They don't call you "Mr. Teflon" for nothing! :) -nt - E-Stat 07:49:56 06/08/10 (7)

Why? Because I can slip out of traps and misreadings? (nt) - Pat D 09:28:02 06/08/10 (6)

Will it go round - E-Stat 12:23:17 06/08/10 (5)

Your are like the evil Citizen Chauvelin . . . - Pat D 14:46:06 06/08/10 (4)

Good to see PHP back to its old form! - kerr 15:34:54 06/08/10 (3)

LOL! - E-Stat 16:26:39 06/08/10 (1)

RE: LOL! - kerr 18:07:32 06/08/10 (0)

Just in case... - kerr 15:43:38 06/08/10 (0)

RE: Denialists must prove DOES NOT - kerr 08:15:37 06/03/10 (0)

Hi Jon - jneutron 11:19:01 05/27/10 (9)

Hi John - Jon Risch 19:58:38 06/01/10 (2)

RE: Hi John - jneutron 06:23:13 06/02/10 (0)

Your interesting aside... - morricab 05:45:33 06/02/10 (0)

RE: Hi Jon - Tony Lauck 12:46:19 05/27/10 (5)

RE: Hi Jon - jneutron 12:56:14 05/27/10 (4)

RE: Hi Jon - Tony Lauck 13:25:27 05/27/10 (3)

RE: Hi Jon - jneutron 14:04:05 05/27/10 (2)

And yet - E-Stat 12:19:00 06/02/10 (1)

Agreed. - jneutron 05:49:40 06/03/10 (0)

RE: will the objectionists finally allow that there is true evidence of cable differences - KlausR. 23:12:54 05/26/10 (66)

RE: Take the cotton out of your ears and put it in your mouth! lol - benie 19:05:47 05/29/10 (1)

You have to speak up - they have their ears plugged with bananas. N/T - carcass93 09:01:00 06/01/10 (0)

"listening test that shows..." - it shows exactly NOTHING, unless you're participant. - carcass93 10:46:19 05/28/10 (16)

RE: I don't give a damn - KlausR. 04:43:53 05/29/10 (15)

When dealing with... - carcass93 08:47:55 06/01/10 (0)

RE: I don't give a damn - kerr 06:32:00 05/29/10 (13)

How come they all make the same, tired as it is irrelevant, medical DBT argument? - carcass93 09:18:17 06/01/10 (1)

RE: How come they all make the same, tired as it is irrelevant, medical DBT argument? - Tony Lauck 07:22:57 06/03/10 (0)

RE: Side effects - KlausR. 07:49:34 05/29/10 (10)

RE: Side effects - kerr 08:43:02 05/29/10 (9)

RE: Any test results that show... - KlausR. 10:53:57 05/29/10 (1)

RE: Any test results that show... - kerr 06:21:53 05/30/10 (0)

Scientific Truth - Jon Risch 10:06:22 05/29/10 (6)

From Earl Geddes distortion papers - morricab 07:15:36 06/03/10 (4)

RE: From Earl Geddes distortion papers - andy_c 14:53:43 06/03/10 (3)

RE: From Earl Geddes distortion papers - morricab 02:01:23 06/04/10 (2)

RE: From Earl Geddes distortion papers - andy_c 08:43:55 06/04/10 (0)

RE: From Earl Geddes distortion papers - Tony Lauck 08:08:05 06/04/10 (0)

RE: Scientific Truth - rick_m 11:45:33 05/29/10 (0)

RE: "I'm not aware" - geoffkait 05:17:05 05/27/10 (46)

RE: The oldest Strawman Argument in the world! - KlausR. 06:32:33 05/27/10 (8)

RE: The oldest Strawman Argument in the world! - geoffkait 06:58:12 05/27/10 (7)

And, as usual, your USEFUL contribution so far is zero. - clifff 09:12:13 05/27/10 (0)

Re: Sorry, Charlie - KlausR. 08:26:37 05/27/10 (5)

Ouch! Low blow - geoffkait 14:37:11 05/27/10 (4)

"LOL!" My kids do that. All the time. - clifff 16:22:54 05/27/10 (3)

So do I. Around here, anyway. (nt) - kerr 06:48:58 05/28/10 (1)

LOL! (nt) - geoffkait 09:46:24 05/28/10 (0)

That's nice, Clifffy. Do they write in really short sentences like their Daddy? nt - geoffkait 16:35:10 05/27/10 (0)

RE: "I'm not aware" - jneutron 05:45:51 05/27/10 (36)

RE: "I'm not aware" - geoffkait 06:08:24 05/27/10 (35)

Barko lounger?? Que? - jneutron 09:27:29 05/27/10 (34)

Barcalounger, the choice of audio skeptics everywhere - geoffkait 09:43:36 05/27/10 (33)

Ah. So anybody who asks you for evidence you imply exists is a skeptic? - jneutron 11:13:42 05/27/10 (32)

RE: Ah. So anybody who asks you for evidence you imply exists is a skeptic? - geoffkait 11:30:27 05/27/10 (31)

RE: Ah. So anybody who asks you for evidence you imply exists is a skeptic? - jneutron 11:46:05 05/27/10 (30)

RE: Ah. So anybody who asks you for evidence you imply exists is a skeptic? - geoffkait 14:35:27 05/27/10 (29)

RE: Ah. So anybody who asks you for evidence you imply exists is a skeptic? - jneutron 05:38:50 05/28/10 (14)

That reminds me... - E-Stat 12:51:58 06/02/10 (6)

would you believe... - jneutron 05:56:59 06/03/10 (5)

I think you would definitely get push back - E-Stat 14:27:11 06/04/10 (4)

I would not recommend video cable for AC. - jneutron 06:09:13 06/07/10 (0)

RE: I think you would definitely get push back - Tony Lauck 11:53:13 06/05/10 (2)

Does video triaxial - E-Stat 16:45:24 06/06/10 (1)

RE: Does video triaxial - Tony Lauck 17:52:56 06/06/10 (0)

RE: Ah. So anybody who asks you for evidence you imply exists is a skeptic? - geoffkait 08:02:26 05/28/10 (0)

RE: Ah. So anybody who asks you for evidence you imply exists is a skeptic? - Tony Lauck 07:46:53 05/28/10 (0)

Good points. - rick_m 07:35:59 05/28/10 (4)

RE: Good points. - Ugly 22:15:31 05/31/10 (3)

RE: Good points. - rick_m 07:08:58 06/01/10 (2)

RE: Good points. - Ugly 12:56:39 06/01/10 (1)

RE: Good points. - rick_m 10:47:00 06/02/10 (0)

Nothing wrong with being a skeptic, where it's appropriate. - Tony Lauck 16:58:39 05/27/10 (13)

I got no beef with DBTs - geoffkait 03:15:22 05/28/10 (12)

RE: I got no beef with DBTs - kerr 06:46:09 05/28/10 (0)

RE: I got no beef with DBTs - Tony Lauck 06:17:26 05/28/10 (10)

RE: I got no beef with DBTs - geoffkait 08:26:23 05/28/10 (9)

RE: I got no beef with DBTs - Tony Lauck 10:39:44 05/28/10 (8)

RE: "In addition the listeners need to be qualified, trained and their qualification and training proven." - geoffkait 11:59:54 05/28/10 (7)

RE: "In addition the listeners need to be qualified, trained and their qualification and training proven." - Tony Lauck 12:13:35 05/28/10 (6)

RE: "In addition the listeners need to be qualified, trained and their qualification and training proven." - morricab 09:25:53 06/02/10 (0)

RE: "In addition the listeners need to be qualified, trained and their qualification and training proven." - geoffkait 12:22:48 05/28/10 (4)

RE: "In addition the listeners need to be qualified, trained and their qualification and training proven." - Tony Lauck 12:59:39 05/28/10 (3)

RE: "In addition the listeners need to be qualified, trained and their qualification and training proven." - geoffkait 14:46:48 05/28/10 (2)

RE: "In addition the listeners need to be qualified, trained and their qualification and training proven." - Tony Lauck 15:00:30 05/28/10 (1)

RE: "In addition the listeners need to be qualified, trained and their qualification and training proven." - geoffkait 15:30:27 05/28/10 (0)

hey, thanks for connecting me to nice site! thanks!!! NT - Elizabeth 18:20:46 05/26/10 (0)

Follow Ups

Objectivists will have to move on to Plan B. - Enophile 22:33:10 05/27/10 (39)

No plan B needed, actually! - KlausR. 01:04:44 05/28/10 (38)

Since you only measure and never listen, - how do you know what's - Sordidman 11:27:25 06/02/10 (37)

RE: Since you only measure and never listen, - how do you know what's audible or not? - KlausR. 00:54:38 06/03/10 (36)

Denialists must prove DOES NOT - Tony Lauck 07:56:02 06/03/10 (35)

Nonsense. - Pat D 11:26:42 06/03/10 (33)

Easy answer - E-Stat 14:26:18 06/03/10 (32)

Way too easy. - Pat D 15:20:36 06/03/10 (31)

I agree - E-Stat 15:23:07 06/03/10 (30)

He asked it because he IS... you know... N/T - carcass93 19:13:53 06/03/10 (29)

You guys should argue this with Dan Banquer. - Pat D 19:25:32 06/03/10 (28)

I always defer to the opinion of - E-Stat 19:28:16 06/03/10 (27)

RE: I always defer to the opinion of - Pat D 20:01:54 06/03/10 (26)

RE Designs was a one trick pony - E-Stat 06:24:30 06/04/10 (25)

So you also want to take on jneutron? - Pat D 10:57:38 06/04/10 (24)

I agree with what JNeutron said, too! - E-Stat 12:20:54 06/04/10 (23)

RE: I agree with what JNeutron said, too! - Pat D 13:08:43 06/04/10 (22)

I'll help you out - E-Stat 13:21:13 06/04/10 (21)

RE: I'll help you out - Pat D 16:11:12 06/04/10 (20)

Who are you quoting now? - E-Stat 16:54:30 06/04/10 (19)

RE: Who are you quoting now? - Pat D 10:39:32 06/05/10 (18)

You continue to miss the point - E-Stat 11:45:02 06/05/10 (17)

RE: You continue to miss the point - Pat D 14:21:53 06/05/10 (16)

I give up on your ability - E-Stat 14:57:00 06/05/10 (15)

The concept is easy--but you haven't established its applicability. - Pat D 07:58:15 06/07/10 (14)

Are you just realizing this? - E-Stat 08:31:00 06/07/10 (13)

Ummm . . . - Pat D 10:39:11 06/07/10 (12)

Boy, you've steered so far off the original course! - E-Stat 11:43:14 06/07/10 (11)

Your course is confused. - Pat D 15:27:24 06/07/10 (10)

Time to step back and review your comments :) - E-Stat 06:34:19 06/08/10 (9)

It's time for you to stop quoting snippets with no context. - Pat D 07:46:22 06/08/10 (8)

They don't call you "Mr. Teflon" for nothing! :) -nt - E-Stat 07:49:56 06/08/10 (7)

Why? Because I can slip out of traps and misreadings? (nt) - Pat D 09:28:02 06/08/10 (6)

Will it go round - E-Stat 12:23:17 06/08/10 (5)

Your are like the evil Citizen Chauvelin . . . - Pat D 14:46:06 06/08/10 (4)

Good to see PHP back to its old form! - kerr 15:34:54 06/08/10 (3)

LOL! - E-Stat 16:26:39 06/08/10 (1)

RE: LOL! - kerr 18:07:32 06/08/10 (0)

Just in case... - kerr 15:43:38 06/08/10 (0)

RE: Denialists must prove DOES NOT - kerr 08:15:37 06/03/10 (0)

Post a Message!