In Reply to: here's a better clue -- no one can demonstrate to witnesses he can hear any difference except SPL posted by Richard BassNut Greene on March 21, 2008 at 07:53:32:
!
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- It wa only a matter of time: RBNG posts the same thing for the 723rd time! (nt) - robert young 10:42:39 03/21/08 (10)
- And you've read it for the 723rd time, complained 723 times & refuted nothing!...So I know for sure your "nt" means.. - Richard BassNut Greene 11:51:52 03/21/08 (4)
- That was weak, RG. - robert young 14:46:29 03/24/08 (3)
- 395 - Richard BassNut Greene 09:01:42 03/25/08 (2)
- You must be nearly spherical by now. You are.... - robert young 09:13:50 03/25/08 (1)
- I give up! - kerr 10:19:13 03/25/08 (0)
- LOL! The "anti-audiophile" Mr. Nut strikes once again...(nt) - mkuller 10:57:26 03/21/08 (4)
- Pro-reality does not mean "anti-audiophile", Mr. Fantasyland audiophile! - Richard BassNut Greene 11:53:58 03/21/08 (0)
- And since DBTs "Don't Work" proof is sidestepped once again! ha ha. (nt) - Presto 11:01:52 03/21/08 (2)
- Yeah hiding the brand name really throws off the hearing ability of those pesky golden ears! - Richard BassNut Greene 11:55:59 03/21/08 (1)
- What methodology did you call upon... - Wellfed 21:25:55 03/25/08 (0)