In Reply to: Here's a clue............ posted by yaukui on March 20, 2008 at 12:47:59:
This is a measurement error. Here's why.Consider hooking up an ideal dummy 8 Ohm load directly to an amplifier without any intervening cable (using spade lugs or whatever). What is the percent distortion in the current through that resistor? The answer is that it's the same as the distortion of the amplifier, because of the simple Ohm's law relationship between voltage and current.
Now connect from the amplifier to the load a cable which is ideal in the sense that it has no distortion, but non-ideal in the sense that the series impedance of each wire of the cable (measured end-to-end) is not zero. We now have a current whose distortion is the same as that of the amplifier, going through the series impedance of the cable. If we measure the voltage drop across the one wire of the cable, it is not zero, because its impedance is not zero. What is the measured distortion if we measure across the cable? It's the same as that of the amplifier if the impedance is resistive, and will be more if it's inductive.
Therefore the claim that this measures the distortion of the cable itself is false. The distortion measured depends strongly on that of the amplifier.
Edits: 03/20/08 03/20/08
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- RE: Here's a clue............ - andy_c 14:01:03 03/20/08 (39)
- Teach me! - Don T 14:42:22 03/20/08 (38)
- RE: Teach me! - andy_c 15:55:39 03/20/08 (37)
- RE: Teach me! - Don T 22:01:20 03/20/08 (0)
- In any event there is still the - bjh 19:46:42 03/20/08 (35)
- Non-linear distortion is not a matter of PH BS - Tony Lauck 09:57:21 03/21/08 (27)
- "A clear definition of distortion is necessary." Exactly what I was going to say! - clarkjohnsen 09:55:11 03/22/08 (16)
- RE: "A clear definition of distortion is necessary." Exactly what I was going to say! - andy_c 10:01:16 03/22/08 (15)
- Beats me, how those guys think they're adding anything to audio knowledge. THD+N indeed! nt - clarkjohnsen 11:06:44 03/22/08 (2)
- THD+N sucks... - andy_c 11:13:31 03/22/08 (1)
- Primitive, really... but look how some will sop it up. nt - clarkjohnsen 11:15:58 03/22/08 (0)
- RE: RMS detector... - rick_m 10:11:06 03/22/08 (11)
- RE: RMS detector... - andy_c 10:37:07 03/22/08 (10)
- You're right. Ironic, isn't it? - rick_m 10:55:54 03/22/08 (9)
- Okay, I found more info on this... - andy_c 11:07:35 03/22/08 (8)
- RE: Have fun... - rick_m 11:32:45 03/22/08 (7)
- FFT Analyzers are the way to go... - gymwear5@hotmail.com 07:12:40 03/25/08 (6)
- You bet! - rick_m 09:34:43 03/25/08 (0)
- RE: FFT Analyzers are the way to go... - morricab 09:07:19 03/25/08 (4)
- RE: FFT Analyzers are the way to go... - gymwear5@hotmail.com 12:31:22 03/25/08 (3)
- RE: FFT Analyzers are the way to go... - morricab 02:03:56 03/26/08 (2)
- RE: FFT Analyzers are the way to go... - gymwear5@hotmail.com 07:50:46 03/26/08 (1)
- RE: FFT Analyzers are the way to go... - morricab 01:11:52 03/27/08 (0)
- Look... - bjh 18:17:19 03/21/08 (9)
- RE: Look... - Don T 08:53:44 03/22/08 (2)
- RE: Look... - andy_c 09:52:40 03/22/08 (1)
- look - Don T 07:31:38 03/24/08 (0)
- RE: Look... - Tony Lauck 19:15:51 03/21/08 (5)
- Really? - bjh 19:23:39 03/21/08 (4)
- RE: Really? - Tony Lauck 19:43:55 03/21/08 (3)
- I have a tape (15ips) of the Mahler First where his mistake makes more sense than the composer's own notes! nt - clarkjohnsen 09:49:35 03/22/08 (1)
- RE: I have a tape (15ips) of the Mahler First where his mistake makes more sense than the composer's own notes - Todd Krieger 08:54:14 03/23/08 (0)
- RE: Really? - Dan Banquer 07:25:21 03/22/08 (0)
- RE: In any event there is still the - andy_c 08:45:38 03/21/08 (6)
- Distortion... - rick_m 23:00:31 03/22/08 (5)
- RE: Distortion... - andy_c 09:45:23 03/23/08 (1)
- RE: Distortion... - rick_m 10:53:50 03/23/08 (0)
- RE: Distortion... - Tony Lauck 07:02:21 03/23/08 (2)
- RE: Distortion... - rick_m 10:05:37 03/23/08 (1)
- RE: Distortion... - Tony Lauck 13:52:39 03/23/08 (0)