In Reply to: Metallurgy of quantum dot revealed... posted by a dainty man on March 30, 2005 at 11:34:29:
If they only used SEM as claimed, the only way they can carry out a semi-qualitative compositional analysis of the QDs (if any) is by using energy-dispersive/X-ray (aka EDX) analysis.1) observed nanoscale features may not be the result of QDs (they were probably told to look for that beforehand) but, rather, that of surface defects, network structures, sputter coating artifacts, etc. which all can have enough electron density contrast to be imaged and showup as QDs on the surface. Bottomline, using SEM alone, the presence of QDs can not be proved (we'd need to see the pics though).
2) the elemental EDX analysis does not have the beam/spatial resolution to probe QD-scale features at the surface...it will only give you a bulk value of the surface composition. So the metals they claimed to see could be attributed to simple impurities mixed in the polymer. basically a dirty chip. Usually you'd need use a complementary orthogonal method to establish the composition of the QDs, such as XRD of the crystalline phase. but of course they'd need to extract and disperse those suckers and I doubt they went throough the trouble, time, and money involved...
Anybody can claim to have carried out a test. we dont even see one SEM pic of the surface which is shown to come from the chip itself. plus the origin of the test is anonymous.
This whole thing is bad science, the chip is a hoax folks. for the nth time, I worked with QDs and THEY CAN'T DO NOTHING TO YOUR CDS in a box on top of your player!
I swore this was the last time I wrote about this...
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- bad science as.... - NonA. 12:40:36 03/30/05 (66)
- Re: bad science as.... - Allan 22:19:29 03/30/05 (46)
- Re: bad science as.... - NonA. 06:22:02 03/31/05 (0)
- Re: bad science as.... - john curl 23:18:03 03/30/05 (44)
- Re: bad science as.... - Allan 06:03:36 03/31/05 (12)
- Re: bad science as.... - Jim Willis 09:05:27 03/31/05 (1)
- ROTFLMAO!!! (nt) - Joe II-V 00:05:56 04/01/05 (0)
- Re: bad science as.... - john curl 08:47:53 03/31/05 (9)
- Re: bad science as.... - Jim Willis 09:07:05 03/31/05 (8)
- Mr. Curl has stated that Geoff Kait, Clark Johnsen and himself... - Wellfed 19:22:15 03/31/05 (7)
- Re: So far... - Jim Willis 19:46:01 03/31/05 (6)
- I believe you missed my point... - Wellfed 22:27:41 03/31/05 (1)
- Re: And I believe you missed mine... - Jim Willis 04:16:02 04/01/05 (0)
- Re: So far... - john curl 22:03:08 03/31/05 (3)
- Re: So far... - a dainty man 07:27:07 04/01/05 (1)
- Re: So far... - john curl 16:00:57 04/04/05 (0)
- Re: So far... - Joe II-V 00:11:34 04/01/05 (0)
- May be you "old guys" should retire. - Tony Montana 05:17:12 03/31/05 (30)
- god help us if the "old guys" retire - sunnysal 14:46:59 04/03/05 (1)
- Re: god help us if the "old guys" retire - john curl 14:47:56 04/05/05 (0)
- Re: May be you "old guys" should retire. - john curl 08:51:17 03/31/05 (26)
- What a load - Ken Perkins 12:06:06 03/31/05 (3)
- Re: What a load - john curl 12:58:37 03/31/05 (2)
- Re: What a load - Steve Eddy 23:28:24 03/31/05 (0)
- Re: What a load - Ken Perkins 13:08:36 03/31/05 (0)
- "We, old guys, are consultants, who tell others what to do. We don't take tech's opinions very seriously."... - NonA. 09:43:25 03/31/05 (21)
- Re: "We, old guys, are consultants, who tell others what to do. We don't take tech's opinions very seriously."... - john curl 10:27:20 03/31/05 (20)
- Re: "We, old guys, are consultants, who tell others what to do. We don't take tech's opinions very seriously."... - Dan Banquer 11:14:44 03/31/05 (19)
- Re: The pot calling the kettle black? Leaving one black and blue? - Guy 01:32:14 04/01/05 (0)
- Let's see: on one hand we have someone who knows the theories and has built things and on the other neither. How to pick - Norm 11:38:19 03/31/05 (17)
- Re: Let's see: on one hand we have someone who knows the theories and has built things and on the other neither. How to - john curl 13:45:56 03/31/05 (7)
- Re: Let's see: on one hand we have someone who knows the theories and has built things and on the other neither. How to - a dainty man 14:44:08 03/31/05 (6)
- Re: Let's see: on one hand we have someone who knows the theories and has built things and on the other neither. How to - john curl 15:33:15 03/31/05 (5)
- Something more reliable. - a dainty man 19:22:08 03/31/05 (1)
- Re: Something more reliable. - john curl 22:04:59 03/31/05 (0)
- Re: Let's see: on one hand we have someone who knows the theories and has built things and on the other neither. How to - morricab 15:41:32 03/31/05 (2)
- The placebo effect is one alternative hypothesis - Norm 16:43:04 03/31/05 (0)
- Re: Let's see: on one hand we have someone who knows the theories and has built things and on the other neither. How to - john curl 16:13:47 03/31/05 (0)
- .How about the Basics? - Dan Banquer 12:09:10 03/31/05 (8)
- Not technical innovation, just psychology - Norm 14:32:27 03/31/05 (7)
- Re: Not technical innovation, just psychology - Dan Banquer 15:48:48 03/31/05 (6)
- I am glad you understand. nt - Norm 16:44:30 03/31/05 (5)
- Re: I am glad you understand. nt - Dan Banquer 17:39:35 03/31/05 (4)
- You are asking me to believe you that I am delusional as were the 7 others in the room - Norm 18:27:25 03/31/05 (3)
- I wasn't the one asking... - Steve Eddy 23:56:09 03/31/05 (2)
- Re: I wasn't the one asking...Steve...if you hadN'T amplified... - Guy 01:26:10 04/01/05 (1)
- Try waving a chip over your monitor (nt) - pburant 06:36:05 04/01/05 (0)
- hehehe good one...nt - NonA. 06:23:26 03/31/05 (0)
- Re: bad science as.... - morricab 15:55:34 03/30/05 (18)
- agreed... - NonA. 18:32:36 03/30/05 (1)
- Re: bad science as.... - john curl 18:15:41 03/30/05 (16)
- I think you are stepping outside the realm of your expertise on this one...you might want.. - NonA. 18:37:24 03/30/05 (15)
- And what realm of expertise allows you to note this? - Norm 20:33:21 03/30/05 (2)
- Re: And what realm of expertise allows you to note this? - NonA. 06:26:12 03/31/05 (1)
- Why does it scare you? - Norm 09:50:35 03/31/05 (0)
- Re: I think you are stepping outside the realm of your expertise on this one...you might want.. - john curl 19:01:24 03/30/05 (11)
- Well, John, speaking only for myself, - Al Sekela 15:50:16 03/31/05 (3)
- Re: Well, John, speaking only for myself, - geoffkait 05:52:29 04/01/05 (2)
- I did my homework. - Al Sekela 10:35:59 04/01/05 (1)
- Re: homework - geoffkait 11:15:29 04/01/05 (0)
- Having an open mind is fine. - B. King 07:37:33 03/31/05 (0)
- You might just as well ask me to have an open mind about Santa... - NonA. 06:31:09 03/31/05 (0)
- Trying to find a scientific explanation is not being closed minded - morricab 03:19:28 03/31/05 (3)
- Re: Trying to find a scientific explanation is not being closed minded - john curl 09:07:12 03/31/05 (2)
- Yeah... Niobium... - Jeff Lessard 15:52:54 04/01/05 (0)
- Re: Trying to find a scientific explanation is not being closed minded - morricab 12:49:50 03/31/05 (0)
- But we ARE open minded! - KlausR. 23:09:18 03/30/05 (0)