Follow Ups Full Thread

Topic - Letters section of TAS has conflict of interest - ruxtonvet 20:34:10 01/01/11 (76)

• RE: Letters section of TAS has conflict of interest - Montejay 07:49:57 01/16/11 (0)
• Sue Kraft probably has the best hearing... - cjfrbw 15:45:59 01/03/11 (17)
• hearing is NOT listening - farfetched 03:11:38 01/04/11 (4)
• Yup and MORE yup! nt - Elizabeth 08:23:39 01/08/11 (0)
• RE: hearing is NOT listening - David W. Robinson 14:03:57 01/07/11 (0)
• Super excellent post NT - lancelot 08:12:15 01/05/11 (0)
• Excellent post! - Ozzy 01:56:11 01/05/11 (0)
• It's not about being able to hear like a bat.... - mkuller 15:57:51 01/03/11 (11)
• FWIW, HP wasn't the only one to have those observations... - cjfrbw 16:47:03 01/03/11 (10)
• HP never shied away from negative reviews - E-Stat 18:25:20 01/03/11 (9)
• RE: HP never shied away from negative reviews - Sue Kraft 22:16:35 01/03/11 (8)
• So let's hear the story... - mkuller 10:20:21 01/04/11 (7)
• RE: So let's hear the story... - Sue Kraft 13:32:48 01/04/11 (6)
• RE: So let's hear the story... - geoffkait 09:35:18 01/10/11 (0)
• Too funny - E-Stat 15:10:22 01/06/11 (4)
• I may be wrong about this.. - jamesgarvin 05:45:47 01/07/11 (3)
• RE: I may be wrong about this.. - john curl 10:46:30 01/16/11 (0)
• Then Curl's anger is misplaced... - mkuller 10:35:44 01/08/11 (1)
• I went back to the library - E-Stat 08:53:50 01/09/11 (0)
• OMG people you need to get ... - RGA 20:13:58 01/02/11 (27)
• RE: OMG people you need to get ... - josh358 08:18:23 01/04/11 (26)
• Agreed... - mkuller 11:56:14 01/05/11 (1)
• RE: Agreed... - josh358 09:05:24 01/06/11 (0)
• Ortofon A90 - Charles Hansen 08:55:34 01/04/11 (21)
• the A90 has received uniformly outstanding reviews - DAP 10:10:12 01/05/11 (3)
• RE: the A90 has received uniformly outstanding reviews - lord addleford 11:03:26 01/05/11 (2)
• A second review is laudatory, not reprehensible - Larry I 08:04:44 01/06/11 (0)
• a second review,essentially disown the initial review - DAP 16:13:33 01/05/11 (0)
• RE: Ortofon A90 - John Atkinson 11:35:31 01/04/11 (9)
• Don't know about these speakers.Anyone???? - frank37@nc.rr.com 12:00:19 01/15/11 (0)
• Yes, the A-90 takes some work to set up - David W. Robinson 14:05:37 01/09/11 (5)
• So you believe that tonearm designer Robert Graham set it up wrong? - DAP 14:21:32 01/09/11 (4)
• RE: So you believe that tonearm designer Robert Graham set it up wrong? - David W. Robinson 14:44:57 01/09/11 (3)
• RE: So you believe that tonearm designer Robert Graham set it up wrong? - Myles B. Astor 06:44:58 01/14/11 (1)
• RE: So you believe that tonearm designer Robert Graham set it up wrong? - David W. Robinson 10:39:30 01/14/11 (0)
• Thanks for the comments - DAP 15:40:42 01/09/11 (0)
• RE: Ortofon A90 - Charles Hansen 18:10:38 01/04/11 (1)
• or didn't know how to set it up - DAP 15:36:54 01/05/11 (0)
• Who are the "kooks that sank Fi?" - Enophile 11:04:37 01/04/11 (5)
• RE: Who are the "kooks that sank Fi?" - Charles Hansen 11:41:20 01/04/11 (4)
• RE: Who are the "kooks that sank Fi?" - regmac 07:55:31 01/05/11 (3)
• RE: Who are the "kooks that sank Fi?" - Charles Hansen 17:16:36 01/05/11 (2)
• RE: Who are the "kooks that sank Fi?" - John Atkinson 18:43:46 01/05/11 (0)
• Must have reviewed mono cartridges only. nt - cjfrbw 17:41:33 01/05/11 (0)
• RE: Ortofon A90 - josh358 10:00:59 01/04/11 (0)
• RE: OMG people you need to get ... - lord addleford 08:50:03 01/04/11 (1)
• RE: OMG people you need to get ... - josh358 09:22:03 01/04/11 (0)
• Saw it, but to me the conflict... - mkuller 12:50:13 01/02/11 (7)
• Is that a rhetorical question ? -nt - E-Stat 17:59:25 01/02/11 (0)
• "Whose view are you gonna trust - HP's or Valin's." - Analog Scott 13:15:26 01/02/11 (5)
• So what exactly is your view on that cartridge's sound? (nt) - mkuller 19:33:06 01/02/11 (4)
• I don't have an opinion on it. - Analog Scott 20:12:10 01/02/11 (3)
• Ah, thanks for making my point... - mkuller 20:58:37 01/02/11 (2)
• "We have to take one side or the other." - Analog Scott 22:22:48 01/02/11 (1)
• RE: "We have to take one side or the other." - DAP 06:01:58 01/03/11 (0)
• RE: Letters section of TAS has conflict of interest - DAP 06:42:21 01/02/11 (20)
• "I sell that product and might be biased, but...." - keith_d 13:11:37 01/02/11 (0)
• RE: Letters section of TAS has conflict of interest - josh358 07:33:47 01/02/11 (18)
• RE: Letters section of TAS has conflict of interest - Pat D 08:34:59 01/04/11 (16)
• RE: Letters section of TAS has conflict of interest - josh358 09:17:46 01/04/11 (15)
• RE: Letters section of TAS has conflict of interest - Pat D 17:31:25 01/05/11 (14)
• RE: Letters section of TAS has conflict of interest - josh358 17:51:20 01/05/11 (13)
• Well, Ya know, Josh, measurements . . . - goldenthal 22:23:19 01/17/11 (1)
• Noting wrong with measurements, but - josh358 06:50:02 01/18/11 (0)
• RE: Letters section of TAS has conflict of interest - Pat D 18:54:24 01/05/11 (10)
• Re Test Records . . . Yes. And - goldenthal 22:29:23 01/17/11 (0)
• RE: Letters section of TAS has conflict of interest - josh358 19:17:44 01/05/11 (8)
• RE: "Otherwise, the reader is likely to conclude . . ." - goldenthal 22:35:28 01/17/11 (1)
• Sure, but - josh358 07:19:55 01/18/11 (0)
• RE: Letters section of TAS has conflict of interest - Pat D 09:12:52 01/06/11 (5)
• RE: Letters section of TAS has conflict of interest - josh358 10:28:52 01/06/11 (3)
• RE: Letters section of TAS has conflict of interest - Pat D 12:04:39 01/06/11 (2)
• RE: Letters section of TAS has conflict of interest - josh358 12:23:07 01/06/11 (1)
• RE: Letters section of TAS has conflict of interest - goldenthal 22:38:08 01/17/11 (0)
• It wasn't a setup issue - DAP 10:24:30 01/06/11 (0)
• Strongly agree NT - lancelot 08:24:57 01/02/11 (0)

Follow Ups

• RE: Letters section of TAS has conflict of interest - goldenthal 22:38:08 01/17/11 (0)