Home Critic's Corner

Discuss a review. Provide constructive feedback. Talk to the industry.

A second review is laudatory, not reprehensible

It is quite rare, as everyone here recognizes, to get a flat out negative review. To be responsible, the magazine should publish a second opinion, whether it was in agreement with, or differing from, the first review.

In the past, TAS use to have this kind of differences of opinion expressed in the magazine and it is sort of refreshing to see it once again.

I haven't heard the A90 (I've heard its close cousin the Per Winfield) so I cannot comment. What a negative review, and even better, multiple reviews do provide is some guidance to the prospective buyer as to what potential problem areas to focus on in an audition. It is often easy to be swept up in the favorable aspect of performance and only notice problem areas later, after extended listening. If someone else has done the extended listening and points out potential problems, it is easier to address, and assess, these issues.


This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
  Kimber Kable  


Follow Ups Full Thread
Follow Ups
  • A second review is laudatory, not reprehensible - Larry I 08:04:44 01/06/11 (0)

FAQ

Post a Message!

Forgot Password?
Moniker (Username):
Password (Optional):
  Remember my Moniker & Password  (What's this?)    Eat Me
E-Mail (Optional):
Subject:
Message:   (Posts are subject to Content Rules)
Optional Link URL:
Optional Link Title:
Optional Image URL:
Upload Image:
E-mail Replies:  Automagically notify you when someone responds.