In Reply to: Question posted by TomLarson on July 3, 2007 at 12:33:19:
It is not 'polarity' itself that was the problem. It was the COMPARISON of the SAME record, with another preamp, with non-inverting polarity, that would make every comparison slightly 'off'. There are other factors that go into my concern about this review, but they are subjective or political, and while disappointing to me, I should have known better.
You see, I didn't need another review. I had 3 great reviews out there already, from competing publications, and I was personally asked to submit my product to HP. I even had to modify the unit that I sent him so that it would meet his loading requirements. This was not a bad thing, and I modified subsequent Vendettas the same way. I also followed up with other upgrades over the years, partially due to Harry's comments.
However, I was led to believe that HP had already heard the Vendetta through his reviewers (at least 3 of them owned a Vendetta on their own at the time) and that he liked it.
Politically, I had been told in advance to personally avoid HP and a review. I was very foolish to ignore this advice.
There is an old adage, something like: If you are making a product and selling it as fast as you can make it, don't risk another review. It can only hurt you, if negative, and not really help you, except for your ego.
I was overconfident, and was led down a garden path!
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- RE: Question - john curl 09:05:29 07/04/07 (88)
- RE: Question - unclestu52 01:20:46 07/07/07 (6)
- Really? - E-Stat 09:19:31 07/07/07 (4)
- RE: Really? - unclestu52 11:22:09 07/07/07 (3)
- He does enjoy "power listening" - E-Stat 12:23:18 07/07/07 (2)
- Isn't power listening contradictory to what HP considers standard? - Ozzie 16:25:55 07/07/07 (1)
- Not at all - E-Stat 04:58:50 07/08/07 (0)
- RE: Question - john curl 07:09:22 07/07/07 (0)
- RE: Question - TomLarson 13:05:38 07/04/07 (1)
- RE: Question - john curl 13:40:08 07/04/07 (0)
- At the expense of confusing the issue with facts - E-Stat 11:57:33 07/04/07 (67)
- RE: At the expense of confusing the issue with facts - the roofman 10:14:41 07/08/07 (1)
- Sure - E-Stat 12:36:19 07/08/07 (0)
- RE: At the expense of confusing the issue with facts - Dave Pogue 13:51:18 07/04/07 (1)
- RE: At the expense of confusing the issue with facts - john curl 14:05:05 07/04/07 (0)
- RE: At the expense of confusing the issue with facts - john curl 12:20:21 07/04/07 (62)
- Set aside the alleged interpersonal subtrafuge for a moment - E-Stat 16:36:51 07/04/07 (58)
- RE: Set aside the alleged interpersonal subtrafuge for a moment - john curl 17:06:26 07/04/07 (57)
- Let's take this one step at a time - E-Stat 22:04:15 07/04/07 (54)
- RE: Let's take this one step at a time - the roofman 10:21:57 07/08/07 (1)
- I suspect he was not referring to drums - LOL ! (nt) - E-Stat 10:50:38 07/08/07 (0)
- RE: Let's take this one step at a time - john curl 22:29:57 07/04/07 (51)
- Only endless - E-Stat 08:12:58 07/05/07 (50)
- The PROBLEM was that HP's initial impressions were gained from listening "out of phase". - clarkjohnsen 09:09:09 07/05/07 (0)
- RE: Only endless - Brian Walsh 08:41:17 07/05/07 (48)
- Reading the actual review yesterday from issue 61 - E-Stat 08:57:04 07/05/07 (47)
- So... - Brian Walsh 09:51:47 07/05/07 (46)
- Geez - E-Stat 10:18:48 07/05/07 (45)
- RE: Geez - jamesgarvin 12:20:39 07/05/07 (44)
- Would it go away? - E-Stat 12:45:27 07/05/07 (43)
- RE: Would it go away? - jamesgarvin 14:04:39 07/05/07 (38)
- Ok, ok, HP speaks again - E-Stat 15:19:06 07/05/07 (37)
- RE: Ok, ok, HP speaks again - jamesgarvin 08:26:37 07/06/07 (27)
- Why should anyone - E-Stat 08:42:51 07/06/07 (26)
- RE: Why should anyone - jamesgarvin 11:53:18 07/06/07 (25)
- Reread my comments - E-Stat 13:46:38 07/06/07 (24)
- RE: Reread my comments - jamesgarvin 16:02:26 07/06/07 (23)
- So, for how many years - E-Stat 19:38:17 07/06/07 (22)
- RE: So, for how many years - jamesgarvin 12:44:51 07/07/07 (21)
- Ask him then - E-Stat 14:13:04 07/07/07 (19)
- I e-mailed him. Posit a guess when I'll get a response with the answer?nt - jamesgarvin 15:15:36 07/07/07 (0)
- RE: Ask him then - TomLarson 14:51:25 07/07/07 (17)
- Yeah well ... - bjh 20:51:20 07/07/07 (16)
- RE: Yeah well ... - TomLarson 09:51:16 07/08/07 (15)
- RE: Yeah well ... - john curl 10:49:24 07/08/07 (14)
- RE: Yeah well ... - John Atkinson 16:27:01 07/09/07 (12)
- RE: Yeah well ... - john curl 18:25:14 07/09/07 (11)
- RE: Yeah well ... - john curl 21:58:27 07/09/07 (10)
- RE: Yeah well ... - Steve Eddy 09:04:43 07/10/07 (9)
- Speaking of whom... - Brian Walsh 10:14:26 07/10/07 (8)
- RE: Speaking of whom... - John Atkinson 13:40:45 07/10/07 (2)
- I want to be the first to say I've used the product on CD's and now they sound like LP's .....nt - TomLarson 17:44:36 07/10/07 (0)
- RE: Speaking of whom... - john curl 14:48:48 07/10/07 (0)
- RE: Speaking of whom... - Steve Eddy 11:15:31 07/10/07 (4)
- RE: Speaking of whom... - Brian Walsh 12:02:42 07/10/07 (3)
- RE: Speaking of whom... - Steve Eddy 12:48:50 07/10/07 (2)
- RE: Speaking of whom... - john curl 13:20:03 07/10/07 (1)
- RE: Speaking of whom... - Steve Eddy 13:46:31 07/10/07 (0)
- RE: Yeah well ... - TomLarson 11:00:33 07/08/07 (0)
- LOL. nt - TomLarson 13:04:59 07/07/07 (0)
- RE: Ok, ok, HP speaks again - john curl 19:02:23 07/05/07 (7)
- Why did you call the product line "vendetta"? nt - bjh 07:36:58 07/06/07 (6)
- RE: Why did you call the product line "vendetta"? nt - john curl 08:29:42 07/06/07 (5)
- Hmmmm...? - bjh 08:37:38 07/06/07 (4)
- RE: Hmmmm...? - john curl 09:24:59 07/06/07 (3)
- Look ... - bjh 09:45:29 07/06/07 (2)
- RE: Look ... - john curl 12:05:35 07/06/07 (1)
- 65 - bjh 12:47:48 07/06/07 (0)
- Totally amazing to me that he can't be bothered to answer questions here himself - TomLarson 17:33:01 07/05/07 (0)
- "...by somehow his not being aware of a phase issue." Were he aware of the issue... - clarkjohnsen 12:54:42 07/05/07 (3)
- Well - E-Stat 14:03:13 07/05/07 (2)
- Didn't HP - unclestu52 01:55:25 07/07/07 (0)
- "HE LISTENED TO IT BOTH WAYS AND KNOWS THE DIFFERENCE." LOL! - clarkjohnsen 09:11:15 07/06/07 (0)
- John, I've seen you mention the tubes vs. ss thing before, and.... - Rick W 17:19:52 07/04/07 (1)
- RE: John, I've seen you mention the tubes vs. ss thing before, and.... - john curl 19:29:37 07/04/07 (0)
- RE: At the expense of confusing the issue with facts - newyorkp7 12:34:12 07/04/07 (2)
- RE: At the expense of confusing the issue with facts - john curl 13:33:08 07/04/07 (1)
- RE: At the expense of confusing the issue with facts - newyorkp7 13:43:48 07/04/07 (0)
- This is what you said in a post below..... - Rick W 10:01:41 07/04/07 (10)
- RE: This is what you said in a post below..... - john curl 10:39:53 07/04/07 (9)
- RE: This is what you said in a post below..... - muser 11:00:44 07/04/07 (8)
- I think the issue is distribution, Larry - Bruce from DC 09:01:33 07/05/07 (5)
- as an aside: during HP's heyday dealers grew tired of the - jim@signalpath 14:05:46 07/07/07 (0)
- RE: I think the issue is distribution, Larry - muser 12:18:03 07/07/07 (2)
- RE: I think the issue is distribution, Larry - Bruce from DC 08:54:39 07/09/07 (1)
- What? - muser 09:40:02 07/10/07 (0)
- And then there are switcheroos from the manufacturer - E-Stat 10:44:56 07/05/07 (0)
- yes, but gimme a break... that's irrelevant - luigi22 11:39:36 07/04/07 (0)
- Exactly. nt - Rick W 11:37:53 07/04/07 (0)