In Reply to: Some explanations. posted by Romy the Cat on August 11, 2002 at 08:01:08:
As a non native english-speaker person I find very difficult to express my perceptions when speaking/writting about audio-gear, music and all the stuff this forum is about, then I tend to use the vocabulary and expressions that other inmates, reviewers and audio-people use, taking as a fact that those are the correct words to describe certain sound features. But as you point in your post, I have the same problems in my mother language, so that's because probably we (as humans) cannot convert into words the characteristics of the sound and music easily. This is as if we tryied to explain to a blind person what are colours, how they look and what they evoke into our brains or souls, perhaps describing a Velazquez painting would be relatively easy, but what about a Picasso's or Kandinsky's?
So perhaps we here in this community could make a kind of sound-audio-music glossary of terms trying to make a consensus about things such as airy presentation, musicality, emmotional involvement, transparent, fast, inner detail and so on. I know what they mean to me (at least what I try to describe when I use them) but would be nice knowing if we all understand the same things.Regards,
AJ.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Great post Romy!!! - A.J. 08:55:01 08/11/02 (19)
- Re: Great post Romy!!! - Romy the Cat 10:37:01 08/11/02 (4)
- where'd you get your GED? - jake goodman 20:58:57 08/11/02 (0)
- Wow... right into the bull's eye - A.J. 11:12:59 08/11/02 (2)
- Re: Wow... right into the bull's eye - Ivan303 12:04:44 08/11/02 (1)
- Ivan... That was funny as hell! - Jeff Lessard 21:34:56 08/11/02 (0)
- There already is a good glossary of audio terminology - Rob Doorack 09:33:19 08/11/02 (13)
- Re: There already is a good glossary of audio terminology - caa 11:35:53 08/11/02 (0)
- Thxs for the link - A.J. 10:47:45 08/11/02 (0)
- don't you find - chiggy 10:42:35 08/11/02 (10)
- Yeah Chiggy! Instead of using a glossary, - brinkmann 10:54:20 08/11/02 (9)
- brinkieeeee...only 17 - chiggy 11:21:43 08/11/02 (8)
- I picked 17 because in falls under the category - brinkmann 18:21:05 08/11/02 (3)
- ack came first - chiggy 18:39:42 08/11/02 (2)
- I'm hemi-semi-demi-omnisci-chiggi. (nt) - brinkmann 18:47:07 08/11/02 (1)
- :-) nt - chiggy 18:58:30 08/11/02 (0)
- Guilty as charged! - Romy the Cat 11:56:43 08/11/02 (3)
- test - chiggy 18:51:48 08/11/02 (2)
- i've lost two messages responding to this post - chiggy 18:57:31 08/11/02 (1)
- “Do his farts sound like Soundlab bassâ€- That is a wonderful commercial! </nt> - Romy the Cat 19:19:26 08/11/02 (0)