In Reply to: RE: That sums it up very well. (nt) posted by Tre' on January 27, 2010 at 07:56:53:
TRE:
Go back to my original post of Jan. 23, 13:58:50, and also review the man's question about his proposed system..
My post is excellent advice for his proposed system-- it will result in very substantial improvements, and will also cost him quite a bit less than the $20,000 he mentioned..
But you turned this into a personal vendetta against me.
Please tell this forum EXACTLY what is wrong with my post. I want complete details, and an honest attempt to HELP THE MAN'S SYSTEM, NOT another attack on me.
You HELP HIM, or SHUT UP..
I DEMAND that you give HIM advice for a system that will outperform what he has outlined, and that will come in under his proposed $20,000 limit.
I WILL NOT answer to any of your posts. You will address a GOOD set of recommendations TO HIM.
I don't see anything-- at all-- wrong with my post. In fact, it's dead right.
However, with your extensive knowledge, I think you could do even better!
Instead of conducting a Witch Hunt, why don't you suggest TO THE POSTER of the inquiry, how you think HE can get the best system for himself.
---Dennis---
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- RE: That sums it up very well. (nt) - tube wrangler 02:29:59 01/28/10 (0)