Not all 3 - audioengr - Propeller Head Plaza

Follow Ups Full Thread

Topic - How do you explain the sonic differences in digital cables? - Penguin 08:02:20 12/08/02 (87)

Well the verdict is in.... - Monstrous Mike 15:05:05 12/11/02 (1)

Re: Well the verdict is in.... - NEAR SOTA 14:37:48 12/12/02 (0)

Re: How do you explain the sonic differences in digital cables? - macaque 09:54:04 12/11/02 (0)

Re: How do you explain the sonic differences in digital cables? - Jon Risch 18:24:52 12/10/02 (2)

Jon, I have read the Jitter article on you website - Penguin 19:36:26 12/10/02 (1)

Penguin, it is more involved than it seems - Jon Risch 22:07:01 12/17/02 (0)

It's all jitter - frequency modulation - audioengr 13:16:38 12/10/02 (0)

Has any of you guys done the following? - Penguin 19:44:37 12/09/02 (1)

Eye patterns dont tell everything - audioengr 13:39:51 12/10/02 (0)

Re: How do you explain the sonic differences in digital cables? - eico1 09:02:55 12/09/02 (34)

Re: How do you explain the sonic differences in digital cables? - Dan Banquer 05:23:54 12/10/02 (32)

Not all 3 - audioengr 13:19:17 12/10/02 (30)

Re: Not all 3 - Todd Krieger 09:40:55 12/11/02 (2)

it does not have to be all 3 - audioengr 20:08:15 12/11/02 (0)

This is only the way that SP/DIF did it.(NT) - audioengr 20:00:34 12/11/02 (0)

Re: Not all 3 - john curl 18:03:14 12/10/02 (0)

I would say all three - John Escallier 14:45:29 12/10/02 (25)

nope, trust me - audioengr 19:43:05 12/10/02 (22)

eerr.... WHAT frequency, dudes and dudettes? - jj 01:27:21 12/13/02 (5)

15 nsec rise-times, ~333nsec period. - audioengr 16:47:18 12/14/02 (0)

Re: eerr.... WHAT frequency, dudes and dudettes? - john curl 10:04:56 12/13/02 (3)

Happy Holidays - John Escallier 11:31:38 12/13/02 (2)

Sure, I've done it. - audioengr 16:50:26 12/14/02 (0)

Re: Happy Holidays - john curl 11:28:35 12/14/02 (0)

Re: nope, trust me - John Escallier 11:41:45 12/11/02 (5)

Re: nope, trust me - audioengr 19:59:13 12/11/02 (0)

Re: nope, trust me - Tom N. 12:30:57 12/11/02 (3)

diodes - audioengr 20:05:41 12/11/02 (0)

Re: nope, trust me - Dan Banquer 17:49:52 12/11/02 (0)

Re: nope, trust me - John Escallier 12:40:08 12/11/02 (0)

Re: nope, trust me - Dan Banquer 05:24:17 12/11/02 (9)

huh? - audioengr 10:17:59 12/11/02 (8)

Re: huh? - Dan Banquer 12:33:16 12/11/02 (7)

Re: huh? - Monstrous Mike 20:08:34 12/11/02 (5)

Transmission-line theory - audioengr 19:35:42 12/12/02 (0)

Re: huh? - Dan Banquer 05:34:11 12/12/02 (3)

44.1 kHz - audioengr 19:37:33 12/12/02 (2)

Re: 44.1 kHz - Monstrous Mike 11:13:32 12/13/02 (1)

That is the data rate for one channel. - Penguin 13:06:22 12/14/02 (0)

SP/DIF - audioengr 19:49:45 12/11/02 (0)

Re: I would say all three - Dan Banquer 17:48:36 12/10/02 (1)

If you meant to say - John Escallier 12:09:41 12/11/02 (0)

Re: How do you explain the sonic differences in digital cables? - john curl 10:09:28 12/10/02 (0)

No argument there :-) - Penguin 19:58:18 12/09/02 (0)

Re: How do you explain the sonic differences in digital cables? - Norm Strong 22:11:07 12/08/02 (0)

Re: How do you explain the sonic differences in digital cables? - Todd Krieger 22:03:09 12/08/02 (21)

You know, i hear ya'.... - Penguin 22:00:04 12/09/02 (6)

Bit Error Rate Rarely a Problem with Redbook - Todd Krieger 00:13:37 12/10/02 (5)

How does RFI affect the sound? Does it have to leak into the analog section? (nt) - Penguin 17:20:01 12/10/02 (4)

In a Way, Yes... - Todd Krieger 19:06:25 12/10/02 (3)

OK I buy that. So it can be measured somehow :-) - Penguin 19:27:34 12/10/02 (2)

Re: OK I buy that. So it can be measured somehow :-) - Todd Krieger 20:08:18 12/10/02 (1)

I am satisfied :-) - Penguin 05:54:59 12/11/02 (0)

Re: How do you explain the sonic differences in digital cables? - Monstrous Mike 12:01:58 12/09/02 (13)

Re: How do you explain the sonic differences in digital cables? - Todd Krieger 21:17:10 12/09/02 (6)

Good... - Monstrous Mike 06:57:44 12/10/02 (5)

Good?? - Todd Krieger 18:44:55 12/10/02 (4)

Re: Good?? - John Escallier 15:41:51 12/11/02 (1)

Re: Good?? - Todd Krieger 18:00:41 12/11/02 (0)

Thank you. - Leisure7 19:29:09 12/10/02 (1)

Wait a cotton pickin minute - John Escallier 15:49:01 12/11/02 (0)

Re: How do you explain the sonic differences in digital cables? - Adi 19:05:02 12/09/02 (5)

Re: How do you explain the sonic differences in digital cables? - Todd Krieger 21:19:17 12/09/02 (2)

That was a sarcastic post (nt) - Adi 08:25:23 12/10/02 (1)

Yeah, Yeah, Yeah... [-; <nt> - Todd Krieger 08:34:53 12/10/02 (0)

Re: How do you explain the sonic differences in digital cables? - Monstrous Mike 19:38:05 12/09/02 (1)

Re: How do you explain the sonic differences in digital cables? - Adi 08:30:54 12/10/02 (0)

What about RFI from the digital link? (nt) - Leisure7 08:16:16 12/08/02 (19)

RFI from the digital link... - Monstrous Mike 12:08:15 12/09/02 (18)

Ever hear of the "pin 1 problem", Mike? - jj 20:35:50 12/12/02 (0)

I agree with Mike - audioengr 13:25:48 12/10/02 (2)

Re: I agree with Mike - Todd Krieger 19:43:46 12/10/02 (1)

More likely - audioengr 10:22:17 12/11/02 (0)

I'm not sure that I buy that, Mike..... - Rod M 17:03:07 12/09/02 (12)

Re: I'm not sure that I buy that, Mike..... - Monstrous Mike 19:48:07 12/09/02 (11)

Re: I'm not sure that I buy that, Mike..... - Rod M 20:11:19 12/09/02 (10)

The specs - audioengr 10:46:48 12/11/02 (3)

"radiated EMI" = RFI source. - Leisure7 11:48:35 12/11/02 (2)

All the designers are worried about - audioengr 16:55:26 12/14/02 (1)

So these regulations - Leisure7 13:25:47 12/15/02 (0)

Re: I'm not sure that I buy that, Mike..... - john curl 10:14:18 12/10/02 (1)

Exactly my point! - Penguin 17:17:28 12/10/02 (0)

Re: I'm not sure that I buy that, Mike..... - Monstrous Mike 07:25:12 12/10/02 (2)

Re: I'm not sure that I buy that, Mike..... - Rod M 17:37:22 12/10/02 (1)

Re: I'm not sure that I buy that, Mike..... - eico1 20:39:07 12/13/02 (0)

Re: I'm not sure that I buy that, Mike..... - Phil Tower 20:55:21 12/09/02 (0)

Re: RFI from the digital link... - Leisure7 13:39:35 12/09/02 (0)

Follow Ups

Not all 3 - audioengr 13:19:17 12/10/02 (30)

Re: Not all 3 - Todd Krieger 09:40:55 12/11/02 (2)

it does not have to be all 3 - audioengr 20:08:15 12/11/02 (0)

This is only the way that SP/DIF did it.(NT) - audioengr 20:00:34 12/11/02 (0)

Re: Not all 3 - john curl 18:03:14 12/10/02 (0)

I would say all three - John Escallier 14:45:29 12/10/02 (25)

nope, trust me - audioengr 19:43:05 12/10/02 (22)

eerr.... WHAT frequency, dudes and dudettes? - jj 01:27:21 12/13/02 (5)

15 nsec rise-times, ~333nsec period. - audioengr 16:47:18 12/14/02 (0)

Re: eerr.... WHAT frequency, dudes and dudettes? - john curl 10:04:56 12/13/02 (3)

Happy Holidays - John Escallier 11:31:38 12/13/02 (2)

Sure, I've done it. - audioengr 16:50:26 12/14/02 (0)

Re: Happy Holidays - john curl 11:28:35 12/14/02 (0)

Re: nope, trust me - John Escallier 11:41:45 12/11/02 (5)

Re: nope, trust me - audioengr 19:59:13 12/11/02 (0)

Re: nope, trust me - Tom N. 12:30:57 12/11/02 (3)

diodes - audioengr 20:05:41 12/11/02 (0)

Re: nope, trust me - Dan Banquer 17:49:52 12/11/02 (0)

Re: nope, trust me - John Escallier 12:40:08 12/11/02 (0)

Re: nope, trust me - Dan Banquer 05:24:17 12/11/02 (9)

huh? - audioengr 10:17:59 12/11/02 (8)

Re: huh? - Dan Banquer 12:33:16 12/11/02 (7)

Re: huh? - Monstrous Mike 20:08:34 12/11/02 (5)

Transmission-line theory - audioengr 19:35:42 12/12/02 (0)

Re: huh? - Dan Banquer 05:34:11 12/12/02 (3)

44.1 kHz - audioengr 19:37:33 12/12/02 (2)

Re: 44.1 kHz - Monstrous Mike 11:13:32 12/13/02 (1)

That is the data rate for one channel. - Penguin 13:06:22 12/14/02 (0)

SP/DIF - audioengr 19:49:45 12/11/02 (0)

Re: I would say all three - Dan Banquer 17:48:36 12/10/02 (1)

If you meant to say - John Escallier 12:09:41 12/11/02 (0)