![]() |
Computer Audio Asylum Music servers and other computer based digital audio technologies. |
|
In Reply to: RE: Computer Audio Symposium - quick impression posted by John Swenson on June 29, 2009 at 12:30:27:
Have to hang out for amarra on pc or wait for someone else to make something similar :)
Yes I used the Lynx cards for digital only. I found syncing to word clock doesnt make a big difference to sound quality, it isn't a fix for jitter.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups Full ThreadTopic - Computer Audio Symposium - quick impression - John Swenson 00:26:28 06/29/09 (131)
- RE: Computer Audio Symposium - quick impression - Gary G 22:38:47 07/06/09 (0)
- RE: Computer Audio Symposium - quick impression - Gary G 19:22:03 06/29/09 (0)
- RE: Computer Audio Symposium - quick impression - Telstar 16:11:38 06/29/09 (0)
- RE: Computer Audio Symposium - quick impression - Phelonious Ponk 14:07:14 06/29/09 (0)
- RE: Computer Audio Symposium - quick impression - Ryelands 12:51:54 06/29/09 (1)
- RE: Computer Audio Symposium - quick impression - Scrith 14:23:08 06/29/09 (0)
- RE: Computer Audio Symposium - quick impression - Todd Krieger 12:27:43 06/29/09 (0)
- RE: Computer Audio Symposium - quick impression - soundchekk 11:57:36 06/29/09 (0)
- A few questions... - Scrith 11:23:13 06/29/09 (94)
- RE: A few questions... - fmak 12:36:23 06/29/09 (2)
- RE: A few questions... - Scrith 12:56:21 06/29/09 (1)
- RE: A few questions... - abysstw 12:59:42 06/29/09 (0)
- RE: A few questions... - John Swenson 12:10:04 06/29/09 (86)
- Amarra - Scrith 12:50:12 06/29/09 (85)
- RE: Amarra - fmak 22:02:23 06/29/09 (1)
- RE: Amarra - Scrith 10:42:35 06/30/09 (0)
- RE: Amarra - Tuckers 16:51:14 06/29/09 (10)
- Compromising IP vs a general technical description - AbeCollins 18:55:18 06/29/09 (0)
- The question is simple... - Scrith 18:37:51 06/29/09 (7)
- RE: QB9 set up - BBQ 09:16:36 09/19/09 (0)
- Scrith, you're not going to like this. - Charles Hansen 22:12:19 06/30/09 (3)
- XP + DirectSound = bad - Scrith 10:38:27 07/01/09 (2)
- RE: XP + DirectSound = bad - Dawnrazor 21:38:04 07/01/09 (0)
- RE: XP + DirectSound = bad - Charles Hansen 21:16:21 07/01/09 (0)
- RE: The question is simple... - Dawnrazor 07:36:26 06/30/09 (2)
- RE: The question is simple... - Scrith 10:40:33 06/30/09 (1)
- RE: The question is simple... - John Swenson 11:33:01 06/30/09 (0)
- RE: Amarra - Phelonious Ponk 18:32:02 06/29/09 (0)
- RE: Amarra - Mercman 14:30:45 06/29/09 (53)
- RE: Amarra - Scrith 20:08:20 06/29/09 (0)
- RE: Amarra - AbeCollins 17:05:43 06/29/09 (51)
- RE: Amarra - Mercman 17:44:15 06/29/09 (50)
- RE: Amarra - Phelonious Ponk 18:47:10 06/29/09 (0)
- RE: Amarra - Tony Lauck 18:47:08 06/29/09 (16)
- RE: Amarra - Gary G 17:04:57 07/02/09 (3)
- RE: Amarra - Tony Lauck 17:55:30 07/02/09 (2)
- RE: Amarra - Gary G 21:05:49 07/02/09 (1)
- RE: Amarra - Tony Lauck 07:54:38 07/03/09 (0)
- RE: Amarra - Tuckers 22:55:17 07/01/09 (8)
- The BMW of player software? - Tony Lauck 06:48:25 07/02/09 (7)
- RE: The BMW of player software? - Tuckers 12:47:51 07/02/09 (1)
- RE: The BMW of player software? - Tony Lauck 13:25:57 07/02/09 (0)
- RE: The BMW of player software? - artcheng@netvigator.com 08:43:45 07/02/09 (4)
- RE: The BMW of player software? - Tony Lauck 09:48:09 07/02/09 (3)
- RE: The BMW of player software? - artcheng@netvigator.com 09:52:55 07/02/09 (2)
- RE: The BMW of player software? - Tony Lauck 11:16:53 07/02/09 (1)
- Oy vey. - alan m. kafton 12:04:02 07/02/09 (0)
- RE: Amarra - Telstar 16:23:22 07/01/09 (0)
- Agree - AbeCollins 20:08:19 06/29/09 (1)
- RE: Agree - Dawnrazor 07:42:51 06/30/09 (0)
- Indeed. - alan m. kafton 18:21:25 06/29/09 (31)
- RE: Indeed. - Scab 08:59:28 06/30/09 (17)
- So? - alan m. kafton 09:55:27 06/30/09 (16)
- RE: So? - Scab 11:09:50 06/30/09 (15)
- RE: So? - alan m. kafton 11:47:49 06/30/09 (14)
- RE: So? - Scab 12:01:34 06/30/09 (13)
- Whether.... - alan m. kafton 12:26:04 06/30/09 (12)
- RE: Whether.... - Scab 12:31:29 06/30/09 (11)
- Please.... - alan m. kafton 12:33:09 06/30/09 (10)
- RE: Please.... - Scab 12:42:29 06/30/09 (9)
- Certainly.... - alan m. kafton 13:24:48 06/30/09 (8)
- RE: Certainly.... - Scab 09:18:55 07/01/09 (0)
- RE: Certainly.... - GCrouser@hvc.rr.com 08:12:29 07/01/09 (2)
- RE: Certainly.... - artcheng@netvigator.com 05:47:26 07/04/09 (1)
- RE: Certainly.... - Scab 08:29:08 07/04/09 (0)
- RE: Certainly.... - cfmsp 15:46:28 06/30/09 (3)
- Au contraire.... - alan m. kafton 16:50:41 06/30/09 (2)
- RE: Au contraire.... - Phelonious Ponk 15:47:58 07/04/09 (1)
- Not identical.... - alan m. kafton 16:42:49 07/04/09 (0)
- But there's an obvious distiction - AbeCollins 20:02:18 06/29/09 (12)
- RE: But there's an obvious distiction - Doc B. 09:38:22 06/30/09 (0)
- RE: But there's an obvious distiction - alan m. kafton 20:33:07 06/29/09 (0)
- RE: But there's an obvious distiction - Vincent VRS 20:29:50 06/29/09 (9)
- RE: But there's an obvious distiction - Scab 08:46:24 06/30/09 (8)
- Yes. - alan m. kafton 09:56:43 06/30/09 (6)
- RE: Yes. - Scab 11:16:16 06/30/09 (5)
- RE: Yes. - alan m. kafton 11:41:01 06/30/09 (4)
- RE: Yes. - Scab 12:04:00 06/30/09 (3)
- Why don't you.... - alan m. kafton 12:32:03 06/30/09 (2)
- RE: Why don't you.... - Scab 12:48:04 06/30/09 (1)
- RE: Why don't you.... - alan m. kafton 13:16:04 06/30/09 (0)
- RE: But there's an obvious distiction - Vincent VRS 08:56:18 06/30/09 (0)
- RE: Amarra - AbeCollins 13:45:20 06/29/09 (17)
- RE: Amarra - Scrith 14:17:51 06/29/09 (3)
- RE: Amarra - Telstar 16:21:04 06/29/09 (2)
- RE: Amarra - Scrith 19:51:18 06/29/09 (1)
- RE: Amarra - Telstar 16:44:11 07/01/09 (0)
- RE: Amarra - John Swenson 14:14:17 06/29/09 (12)
- Indeed - Scrith 19:57:10 06/29/09 (11)
- Scientific method - John Swenson 12:14:28 06/30/09 (4)
- RE: Scientific method - SashaV 05:44:36 07/04/09 (0)
- I thought engineers just said so.... - Dawnrazor 20:30:34 06/30/09 (0)
- I vote for option 3 :-) nt - Tony Lauck 19:24:15 06/30/09 (0)
- Perfect. [nt] - alan m. kafton 12:22:28 06/30/09 (0)
- RE: Indeed - Vincent VRS 20:50:04 06/29/09 (3)
- RE: Indeed - Scrith 10:31:45 06/30/09 (0)
- Wide of the mark - Andyman 02:35:27 06/30/09 (1)
- RE: Wide of the mark - Vincent VRS 07:42:42 06/30/09 (0)
- RE: Indeed - artcheng@netvigator.com 20:42:27 06/29/09 (1)
- RE: Indeed - fmak 11:02:39 06/30/09 (0)
- Aww, sounds like this kid didn't get to go to Disney... here, want a hotdog? - abysstw 11:35:25 06/29/09 (3)
- Forget the hot dog! - Scrith 14:59:42 06/29/09 (0)
- RE: Aww, sounds like this kid didn't get to go to Disney... here, want a hotdog? - fmak 12:27:00 06/29/09 (1)
- Oh, because that is clearly relevant. Somehow you contribute more by hiding behind the id "fmak"? - abysstw 12:58:16 06/29/09 (0)
- RE: Computer Audio Symposium - quick impression - audioengr 11:16:27 06/29/09 (1)
- RE: Computer Audio Symposium - quick impression - Telstar 16:26:36 06/29/09 (0)
- Thanks John - Mercman 10:35:58 06/29/09 (0)
- RE: Computer Audio Symposium - quick impression - fmak 10:01:11 06/29/09 (8)
- RE: Computer Audio Symposium - quick impression - audioengr 11:15:23 06/29/09 (7)
- RE: Computer Audio Symposium - quick impression - fmak 12:28:45 06/29/09 (3)
- RE: Computer Audio Symposium - quick impression - audioengr 20:04:58 06/29/09 (2)
- RE: Computer Audio Symposium - quick impression - artcheng@netvigator.com 20:44:18 06/29/09 (1)
- Saracon - Thomas James 21:39:36 06/29/09 (0)
- RE: Computer Audio Symposium - quick impression - Tony Lauck 12:02:11 06/29/09 (2)
- RE: Computer Audio Symposium - quick impression - audioengr 20:08:20 06/29/09 (1)
- RE: Computer Audio Symposium - quick impression - Tony Lauck 20:30:19 06/29/09 (0)
- Would be interesting to know details of PC setup - there are several make it/break it decisions... - carcass93 09:23:16 06/29/09 (3)
- memory timings - Telstar 17:17:29 07/01/09 (0)
- RE: Would be interesting to know details of PC setup - there are several make it/break it decisions... - John Swenson 11:20:56 06/29/09 (0)
- RE: Would be interesting to know details of PC setup - there are several make it/break it decisions... - Doc B. 10:03:56 06/29/09 (0)
- RE: Computer Audio Symposium - quick impression - artcheng@netvigator.com 08:53:54 06/29/09 (5)
- RE: Computer Audio Symposium - quick impression - John Swenson 12:23:28 06/29/09 (4)
- RE: Computer Audio Symposium - quick impression - matanarazi 21:54:19 06/30/09 (3)
- Matan Server - RioTubes 06:15:27 07/01/09 (2)
- RE: Matan Server - matanarazi 10:37:43 07/01/09 (1)
- RE: Matan Server - RioTubes 11:00:17 07/01/09 (0)
- Amara? - jimmyjames 07:35:35 06/29/09 (1)
- Amarra! - jimmyjames 07:41:02 06/29/09 (0)
- RE: Computer Audio Symposium - quick impression - drrd 05:30:00 06/29/09 (3)
- RE: Computer Audio Symposium - quick impression - John Swenson 12:30:27 06/29/09 (2)
- RE: Computer Audio Symposium - quick impression - drrd 13:02:07 06/29/09 (1)
- RE: Computer Audio Symposium - quick impression - John Swenson 14:31:39 06/29/09 (0)
- Excellent report - many thanks (nt) - Ryelands 02:35:05 06/29/09 (0)
Follow Ups
- RE: Computer Audio Symposium - quick impression - drrd 13:02:07 06/29/09 (1)
- RE: Computer Audio Symposium - quick impression - John Swenson 14:31:39 06/29/09 (0)