In Reply to: Thinking about running my non-OTL Circlotron again posted by Tre' on August 17, 2011 at 14:53:50:
Is there a specific technical reason why a non-OTL class A circlotron (with low Rp tubes like 6AS7) should sound any better than a more conventional class A push pull amplifier that uses the very same output tubes and driver circuit?
I completely agree with you that ALL commercial OTL tube amplifiers operate in class A/B - no question about this.
And if I were not a DIY I would certainly push hard the magic triplet of arguments 'class A-OTL-circlotron" (maybe with some flavour of no feedback) for selling my supposed brand new products.
Unfortunately, a practical 'class A-OTL-circlotron' (tube) amplifier would require special high current/low Rp output tubes that have never been invented (and never put into production).
So I suppose that, knowing the above, if I were a manufacturer willing to push the circlotron argument, a manufacturer who knows that another manufacturer has already used two 'OTL-circlotron' (if not 'class A-OTL-circlotron') magic arguments, my only choice would be to push the 'class A-circlotron' remaining arguments.
But in doing so, then there should be some other technical argument to support the hypothesis that 'class A-circlotron' is better than conventional class A push pull.
Otherwise any manufacturer of class A conventional push pull amplifiers could easily argue that 'class A-circlotron' (as well as OTL-circlotron) is nothing special at all.
Based on my past DIY experience, IMHO class A (PP) and class A/B OTL perform almost the same.
However, I personally prefer a class A/B OTL in case the higher output power of class A (PP) is not really necessary.
Best Regards
Luca
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- I am curious.... - 6AS7_6SN7 12:41:20 09/04/11 (1)
- RE: I am curious.... - me 21:25:40 09/06/11 (0)