In Reply to: RE: this FAQ has been on the website for over a year. posted by Duke on August 30, 2011 at 15:06:07:
The personal agenda thing had not occurred to me and it makes more sense...
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups Full ThreadTopic - Thinking about running my non-OTL Circlotron again - Tre' 14:53:50 08/17/11 (84)
- I am curious.... - 6AS7_6SN7 12:41:20 09/04/11 (1)
- RE: I am curious.... - me 21:25:40 09/06/11 (0)
- Isn't this the "OTL" Forum (as opposed to the "non-OTL" forum)? - baileyler 19:55:27 08/27/11 (3)
- RE: Isn't this the "OTL" Forum (as opposed to the "non-OTL" forum)? - Tre' 09:17:21 08/28/11 (0)
- RE: Isn't this the "OTL" Forum (as opposed to the "non-OTL" forum)? - Banat 01:04:46 08/28/11 (1)
- RE: Isn't this the "OTL" Forum (as opposed to the "non-OTL" forum)? - Tre' 09:01:09 08/28/11 (0)
- RE: Thinking about running my non-OTL Circlotron again - Ralph 13:08:02 08/23/11 (45)
- RE: Thinking about running my non-OTL Circlotron again - Tre' 14:30:04 08/24/11 (0)
- RE: Thinking about running my non-OTL Circlotron again - Tre' 19:26:49 08/23/11 (43)
- RE: Thinking about running my non-OTL Circlotron again - Ralph 08:59:54 08/24/11 (42)
- RE: Thinking about running my non-OTL Circlotron again - Tre' 10:26:09 08/24/11 (41)
- RE: Thinking about running my non-OTL Circlotron again - Ralph 13:47:47 08/24/11 (5)
- RE: Thinking about running my non-OTL Circlotron again - Tre' 14:39:43 08/24/11 (4)
- RE: Thinking about running my non-OTL Circlotron again - Lew 14:52:00 08/24/11 (3)
- RE: Thinking about running my non-OTL Circlotron again - Tre' 15:05:03 08/24/11 (0)
- Whoops! - Lew 14:57:15 08/24/11 (1)
- RE: Whoops! - Tre' 15:13:40 08/24/11 (0)
- Micheal Rothacher understands Class A - Tre' 11:45:35 08/24/11 (34)
- RE: Micheal Rothacher understands Class A - Ralph 14:10:13 08/24/11 (33)
- RE: Micheal Rothacher understands Class A - Tre' 14:50:57 08/24/11 (32)
- RE: Sheesh - Ralph 08:10:56 08/25/11 (31)
- RE: Sheesh - Tre' 19:44:03 08/25/11 (29)
- How about an actual experiment? - cnpope 09:17:45 08/26/11 (28)
- RE: How about an actual experiment? - Tre' 11:04:18 08/26/11 (27)
- RE: How about an actual experiment? - cnpope 12:04:23 08/26/11 (26)
- RE: How about an actual experiment? - Ralph 11:53:30 08/30/11 (0)
- RE: How about an actual experiment? - Tre' 12:28:17 08/26/11 (24)
- RE: How about an actual experiment? - Jack Williams 15:40:04 08/26/11 (23)
- RE: How about an actual experiment? - Tre' 17:46:24 08/26/11 (22)
- "Ask Kurt Strain about this issue." - kurt s 23:43:12 08/29/11 (7)
- Thanks, Kurt... - Lew 13:29:50 08/30/11 (6)
- Paul Speltz did the wrong thing - kurt s 18:10:04 08/30/11 (5)
- RE: Paul Speltz did the wrong thing - Lew 07:08:04 08/31/11 (4)
- Here is Paul Speltz' post on circlotron output Z... - Lew 07:40:22 08/31/11 (3)
- I see that really Paul almost did the wrong thing. - kurt s 20:02:04 08/31/11 (2)
- Output Z of cathode follower... - Lew 20:51:46 09/01/11 (1)
- RE: Output Z of cathode follower... - kurt s 00:42:47 09/02/11 (0)
- In truth, Tre',... - Lew 23:42:21 08/27/11 (1)
- RE: In truth, Tre',... - Tre' 08:01:36 08/28/11 (0)
- King Ralph - GFL 06:39:53 08/27/11 (11)
- Is this you again Tre', using a different moniker? - Duke 19:46:19 08/28/11 (10)
- No, it is not me. - Tre' 21:33:06 08/28/11 (9)
- Uncanny resemblance in writing styles - Duke 22:05:37 08/28/11 (8)
- Hi Duke - Lew 13:17:54 08/30/11 (0)
- RE: this FAQ has been on the website for over a year. - Ralph 12:32:56 08/30/11 (2)
- RE: this FAQ has been on the website for over a year. - Duke 15:06:07 08/30/11 (1)
- RE: this FAQ has been on the website for over a year. - Ralph 15:31:42 08/30/11 (0)
- RE: Uncanny resemblance in writing styles - Tre' 22:12:02 08/28/11 (3)
- GoodFu++ingLuck - GFL 05:26:17 08/29/11 (2)
- RE: GoodFu++ingLuck = GFL? - Lew 17:34:32 08/29/11 (1)
- Bullying - GFL 06:39:56 09/05/11 (0)
- RE: Sheesh - Tre' 11:21:10 08/25/11 (0)
- Correction, that graph is for 8 tubes per amp for 23 watts. Sorry - Tre' 13:55:36 08/18/11 (28)
- schematic - tyu 09:29:14 08/19/11 (27)
- RE: schematic - Tre' 12:38:53 08/19/11 (26)
- RE: schematic - Banat 02:31:08 08/20/11 (21)
- RE: schematic - Tre' 09:00:07 08/20/11 (20)
- RE: schematic - Banat 10:47:49 08/20/11 (19)
- RE: schematic - Lew 16:53:22 08/20/11 (2)
- RE: schematic - tyu 08:20:56 08/21/11 (1)
- RE: schematic - airheadair 20:58:28 08/29/11 (0)
- RE: schematic - Tre' 14:39:48 08/20/11 (15)
- RE: schematic - Banat 16:43:02 08/20/11 (14)
- RE: schematic - Tre' 17:00:20 08/20/11 (13)
- RE: schematic - Banat 02:23:22 08/22/11 (12)
- There's a major polarity error of a good schematic in there - kurt s 00:17:41 08/30/11 (2)
- RE: There's a major polarity error of a good schematic in there - Banat 02:29:49 08/30/11 (1)
- You can't analyze a way out of a paper bag, you idiot. - kurt s 09:31:34 08/30/11 (0)
- RE: schematic - Tre' 09:39:18 08/22/11 (7)
- RE: schematic - Banat 12:35:41 08/22/11 (4)
- RE: schematic - Tre' 12:45:13 08/22/11 (3)
- RE: schematic - Banat 14:17:37 08/22/11 (1)
- RE: schematic - Banat 14:04:12 08/26/11 (0)
- More - Tre' 13:04:19 08/22/11 (0)
- P.S. - Tre' 10:14:52 08/22/11 (1)
- And now for the math - Tre' 10:47:17 08/22/11 (0)
- RE: schematic - tyu 04:40:45 08/22/11 (0)
- RE: schematic - tyu 12:58:27 08/19/11 (3)
- RE: schematic - Ralph 12:16:43 08/23/11 (2)
- RE: schematic - tyu 04:30:31 08/24/11 (0)
- RE: schematic - Banat 17:57:14 08/23/11 (0)
- RE: Thinking about running my non-OTL Circlotron again - Lew 07:02:48 08/18/11 (2)
- RE: Thinking about running my non-OTL Circlotron again - Tre' 12:38:41 08/18/11 (1)
- RE: Thinking about running my non-OTL Circlotron again - Lew 13:21:16 08/18/11 (0)
Follow Ups
- RE: this FAQ has been on the website for over a year. - Ralph 15:31:42 08/30/11 (0)