Isolation Ward

Posted by clarkjohnsen (R) on July 23, 2007 at 14:15:24

In Reply to: RE: Hand Cream and static. posted by May Belt on July 23, 2007 at 12:43:07

...that does *not* implicate a Belt effect? I mean, even just *touching* something, fer Heaven's sake!

Cannot a procedure have duple or even triple reasons for its effect?

And finally, when one destaticizes a CD or LP electromagnetically (or with a Bedini thingie), no cream, no touching, doesn't that surely suggest a non-Beltian attribute?

clark

• RE: First, quick response -- more to come. May, is there *anything* one can do to one's system... - May Belt 08:03:31 07/25/07 (19)
  • RE: First, quick response -- more to come. May, is there *anything* one can do to one's system... - rick_m 10:16:39 07/25/07 (0)
  • The examples you offer are geared towards a Beltist explanation. And... - clarkjohnsen 09:06:10 07/25/07 (17)
    • RE: The examples you offer are geared towards a Beltist explanation. And... - Posy Rorer 14:46:58 07/25/07 (15)
      • You write as though I'm denying the Beltist phenomena; I am not. I'm just trying to... - clarkjohnsen 08:28:45 07/26/07 (14)
        • My argument is the lotion tweak is a Beltist tweak. And nothing else. - Posy Rorer 11:22:30 07/26/07 (13)
          • How we gonna separate the variables? nt - clarkjohnsen 07:53:28 07/30/07 (6)
            • Easy. Test passive devices in another room. nt - Posy Rorer 22:04:53 07/30/07 (5)
              • Do we know that such a move obliterates the effect? Maybe go next door? nt - clarkjohnsen 08:41:19 07/31/07 (4)
                • Yes, well going or placing the DUT next door will obliterate both conventional and Beltist effects. -nt - Posy Rorer 12:55:47 07/31/07 (3)
                  • What if "next door" is an apartment and thier rooms are contiguous with yours? (Just askin'...) - clarkjohnsen 09:40:29 08/01/07 (2)
                    • RE: What if "next door" is an apartment and thier rooms are contiguous with yours? (Just askin'...) - May Belt 12:37:29 08/01/07 (1)
                      • "Science does not begin to touch a fraction of how and why things work." No argument here! And... - clarkjohnsen 12:44:37 08/01/07 (0)
          • Wow. That was quite a string of insults! A+ for effort! - Enophile 14:53:34 07/26/07 (5)
            • Awww shucks, tweren't nuthin'.... No, really. - Posy Rorer 21:40:45 07/26/07 (4)
              • Poser, showing his reflective, thoughtful side.... - rlw 07:43:21 07/30/07 (2)
                • RLW's reflective side: "Make the giant, manly leap and show up on my doorstep while runnin' yer big mouth." - Posy Rorer 15:35:39 07/31/07 (0)
                • SF Tech troll, have you met the Richard L. Wainwright troll? - Posy Rorer 22:00:58 07/30/07 (0)
              • Posy, that is quite a manifesto you have there... - SF tech 23:32:47 07/26/07 (0)
    • RE: The examples you offer are geared towards a Beltist explanation. And... - May Belt 10:34:38 07/25/07 (0)
• RE: First, quick response -- more to come. May, is there *anything* one can do to one's system... - May Belt 15:21:34 07/23/07 (24)
  • "So, Clark, I ask you." And ye shall be answered. - clarkjohnsen 10:57:07 07/24/07 (9)
    • RE: "So, Clark, I ask you." And ye shall be answered. - May Belt 14:52:56 07/24/07 (8)
      • And more, and more - clarkjohnsen 09:13:26 07/25/07 (5)
        • RE: And more, and more - May Belt 03:51:15 07/26/07 (1)
          • Thanks for the essay, it elucidates the phenomenon wonderfully. - clarkjohnsen 08:18:56 07/30/07 (0)
        • Perfect question. The whole jar being in the room or the house should have a proportionately large impact. - Enophile 10:36:07 07/25/07 (2)
          • RE: Perfect question. The whole jar being in the room or the house should have a proportionately large impact. - Posy Rorer 15:12:19 07/25/07 (1)
            • Thanks, your answer is logically consistent. We gotta drink and listen together. - Enophile 15:22:22 07/25/07 (0)
      • RE: "So, Clark, I ask you." And ye shall be answered. - May Belt 08:01:57 07/25/07 (1)
        • A static charge - unclestu52 19:14:29 07/25/07 (0)
  • You presume, of course,... - rlw 10:53:25 07/24/07 (12)
    • RE: You presume, of course,... - May Belt 14:49:06 07/24/07 (7)
      • Only because Posy claimed that was my "problem"... - rlw 09:46:34 07/26/07 (6)
        • RE: Only because Posy claimed that was my "problem"... - May Belt 02:01:32 07/27/07 (5)
          • Sorry, May, the record speaks for itself... - rlw 05:39:40 07/27/07 (4)
            • Yes it does. And the record shows that you're an insincere troll with a tweak-bashing agenda. - Posy Rorer 08:59:40 07/28/07 (2)
              • Man, I'm LOVIN' this! - rlw 15:38:57 07/29/07 (1)
                • Great job, "rlw". Thanks for confirming your troll status. You can be safely ignored now. -nt - Posy Rorer 22:11:28 07/30/07 (0)
            • RE: Sorry, May, the record speaks for itself... - May Belt 08:42:03 07/27/07 (0)
    • "I'll wait while you collect your thoughts..." Condescending, patronizing, fatuous... - clarkjohnsen 11:01:16 07/24/07 (3)
      • Well, well, Mr. Johnsen... - rlw 11:12:27 07/24/07 (2)
        • It's your "attitude*, dude, not your questions. nt - clarkjohnsen 11:30:45 07/24/07 (1)
          • You might be on to something there, dear boy... - rlw 11:46:34 07/24/07 (0)
  • "As a 'professional in audio' one cannot 'flounder around'" - pburant 08:43:35 07/24/07 (0)

Post a Followup:

---

[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] Thread: [ Display  All  Email ] [ Isolation Ward ]
[ Comment ] [ Edit ] [ Delete ] [ Copyright Warning! Click for Details ]

---

[ Top of Page ] [ Contact Us ] [ Support/Wish List ] [ Copyright © 2007, Audio Asylum, all rights reserved ]

---

[ General ] [ Speakers ] [ Tubes ] [ Vinyl ] [ Digital ] [ Hi-Rez ] [ Video Asylum ] [ Cables ] [ Tweaks/DIY ] [ Music ] [ Films ]

---