Isolation Ward From ebony pucks to magic foil, mystical and controversial tweaks. |
|
In Reply to: RE: The examples you offer are geared towards a Beltist explanation. And... posted by Posy Rorer on July 25, 2007 at 14:46:58:
...sort through the possible contributions of each element, particularly difficult in the case of CDs (or records).
clark
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups Full ThreadTopic - Hand Cream and static. - May Belt 12:43:07 07/23/07 (181)
- We all gotta get in the same room! - Enophile 18:26:56 07/31/07 (12)
- "Would any of y'all refuse to break bread and/or toss back beverages with your doppelgangers?" - SF tech 15:41:34 08/01/07 (1)
- This has the makings of an all time classic party. - Enophile 12:11:58 08/02/07 (0)
- Count me in... - rlw 13:12:29 08/01/07 (1)
- Don't forget to bring your, uh, you know... - geoffkait 14:35:19 08/01/07 (0)
- You're the guys! - unclestu52 18:45:01 07/31/07 (7)
- I think I wuz prolly one of the first... - geoffkait 12:21:15 08/01/07 (6)
- You would be welcome to bring any "reversible" tweak you'd like...just so long as we don't lose our deposit! - Enophile 14:16:17 08/02/07 (5)
- By "reversible" do you mean like system enhancing fluids? :-) nt - geoffkait 15:22:56 08/02/07 (4)
- RE: By "reversible" do you mean like system enhancing fluids? :-) nt - May Belt 01:30:05 08/03/07 (3)
- Last year, we made two types. - Enophile 07:10:03 08/03/07 (2)
- Oh, mass loading. Why didn't you say so? nt - geoffkait 03:08:01 08/04/07 (0)
- Ah ha! So that would be a "Beltist" style tweak then... - rick_m 08:30:51 08/03/07 (0)
- RE: Hand Cream and static. - zanash 00:11:06 07/24/07 (121)
- RE: Hand Cream and static. - May Belt 10:53:06 07/24/07 (2)
- RE: Hand Cream and static. - zanash 23:12:53 07/24/07 (1)
- Did you test this ? NT - Lowrider 06:58:19 09/17/07 (0)
- RE: Hand Cream and static. - rick_m 09:34:26 07/24/07 (6)
- RE: Hand Cream and static. - zanash 01:38:23 07/26/07 (0)
- "...altering the mechanical damping of the disk." And more. - clarkjohnsen 09:27:16 07/25/07 (0)
- I do believe - unclestu52 11:34:34 07/24/07 (3)
- RE: I do believe - rick_m 12:27:36 07/24/07 (2)
- Yep - unclestu52 12:33:52 07/24/07 (1)
- In Microsoft I trust! - rick_m 12:58:40 07/24/07 (0)
- RE: Hand Cream and static. - Posy Rorer 09:16:48 07/24/07 (110)
- NOTE ALL: The two responses just below were simply intended to derail the discussion. - clarkjohnsen 09:22:15 07/25/07 (1)
- STALKER ALERT!!! New thread policeman in town? - Enophile 09:57:38 07/25/07 (0)
- The product names, "Cream Electret" and "Sol Electret" imply something via their use of the word "electret." - Enophile 11:16:52 07/24/07 (1)
- RE: The product names, "Cream Electret" and "Sol Electret" imply something via their use of the word "electret." - Posy Rorer 12:19:54 07/25/07 (0)
- Be aware though... - rlw 10:41:35 07/24/07 (12)
- RE: Be aware though... - zanash 01:39:27 07/26/07 (0)
- Now you're comparing me to a Nazi? Yeah, you're really convincing us you're not a troll. - Posy Rorer 13:39:31 07/25/07 (4)
- Posy is everyone you disagree with a troll? - Lt Einhorn 05:51:33 06/09/15 (0)
- Not Hitler, you dolt, it's the Chermans, Tommy! - rlw 09:32:11 07/26/07 (0)
- Godwin's Law...excellent. - Enophile 14:59:37 07/25/07 (1)
- RE: Godwin's Law...excellent. - Posy Rorer 16:20:31 07/25/07 (0)
- Once they get a foothold in your house you can never get rid of them - geoffkait 11:00:44 07/24/07 (5)
- You already used that line, Geoff... - rlw 11:15:37 07/24/07 (4)
- "Most of us" - geoffkait 11:26:51 07/24/07 (3)
- I'm not a baker... - rlw 11:35:50 07/24/07 (2)
- Not a pretty picture... - Wellfed 20:14:03 07/24/07 (0)
- Rlw, I have to admit you do exude a certain, uh, charm... - geoffkait 13:32:56 07/24/07 (0)
- "Do the test, you'll have the answers." - pburant 10:03:05 07/24/07 (92)
- RE: "Do the test, you'll have the answers." - Posy Rorer 13:17:05 07/25/07 (0)
- "[Your] ideas are never accompanied by any validation of the ideas." Yep. Einstein wrote those papers... - clarkjohnsen 09:18:50 07/25/07 (90)
- He demonstrated the math - unclestu52 19:07:47 07/25/07 (89)
- Lemaitre also demonstrated the math. Einstein didn't believe him. -nt - Posy Rorer 20:28:49 07/25/07 (88)
- Notice the weasely shift from lack of "validation" to *well, he did the math.* LOL! - clarkjohnsen 08:41:58 07/26/07 (84)
- A dim wit and a weasel, that I am - unclestu52 13:35:17 07/26/07 (83)
- A mathematical model for the Beltist phenomenon, as requested. - Posy Rorer 14:34:13 07/26/07 (64)
- Our antagonist weaseled out again; that, coupled with David Aitkin's notable takedown of his illogic... - clarkjohnsen 08:14:54 07/30/07 (55)
- It is a sad time - unclestu52 12:42:11 07/30/07 (52)
- Posey's Doubly-Sad Mathematical Model & The Mars Lunar Lander - Posy Rorer 20:38:51 07/30/07 (50)
- "I'm not sure why he is [an antagonist] to you." - clarkjohnsen 08:23:23 07/31/07 (45)
- Hatfield vs. McCoy: The Polarity Years - Posy Rorer 11:15:12 07/31/07 (44)
- All basically true, except that "it can only be determined subjectively". - clarkjohnsen 09:35:01 08/01/07 (0)
- RE: Hatfield vs. McCoy: The Polarity Years - rick_m 20:11:20 07/31/07 (1)
- RE: Hatfield vs. McCoy: The Polarity Years - Posy Rorer 22:27:48 07/31/07 (0)
- RE: Hatfield vs. McCoy - unclestu52 13:49:35 07/31/07 (40)
- RE: Hatfield vs. McCoy - Posy Rorer 16:20:50 07/31/07 (39)
- RE: Hatfield vs. McCoy - unclestu52 18:30:32 07/31/07 (38)
- RE: I now understand the emphasis on amplitude measurements over time measurements - rick_m 19:56:03 07/31/07 (19)
- This very problem was fingered as a culprit in The Wood Effect (1988). - clarkjohnsen 10:14:16 08/01/07 (0)
- RE: I now understand the emphasis on amplitude measurements over time measurements - unclestu52 20:48:42 07/31/07 (17)
- RE: I now understand the emphasis on amplitude measurements over time measurements - rick_m 22:29:17 07/31/07 (16)
- Usually inverting the polarity - unclestu52 01:36:44 08/01/07 (15)
- RE: Usually inverting the polarity - rick_m 07:58:41 08/01/07 (14)
- See how "they" have been messing with you? Just as with polarity! nt - clarkjohnsen 10:17:21 08/01/07 (13)
- Still waiting to know who "they" are.... -nt - rick_m 11:56:28 08/02/07 (5)
- "They" are Them; haven't you seen the movie? nt - clarkjohnsen 12:00:03 08/02/07 (4)
- I'm confused. I thought "Them" was Van Morrison's old band? -nt - Posy Rorer 22:05:26 08/02/07 (1)
- Them too. nt - clarkjohnsen 07:26:25 08/03/07 (0)
- RE: "They" are Them; haven't you seen the movie? nt - rick_m 13:10:05 08/02/07 (1)
- It's a wretched movie indeed, but highly informative. I'm with you on The Simpsons. In fact... - clarkjohnsen 07:20:48 08/03/07 (0)
- Actually, I don't see... - rick_m 11:33:23 08/01/07 (6)
- Question: Do the "speaker guys" ever tell us that they're selling phase incoherencers? - clarkjohnsen 11:41:59 08/01/07 (5)
- RE: Question: Do the "speaker guys" ever tell us that they're selling phase incoherencers? - rick_m 13:50:21 08/01/07 (4)
- What you say, was already well-known back in the Seventies and Eighties. - clarkjohnsen 08:43:08 08/02/07 (3)
- What WASN'T covered in 'The Wood Effect'? - rick_m 10:11:00 08/02/07 (2)
- Answer: What WAS, was anything and everything to do with polarity. - clarkjohnsen 10:34:21 08/02/07 (1)
- LOL!!!!! - unclestu52 15:02:22 09/16/07 (0)
- RE: Hatfield vs. McCoy - Posy Rorer 19:21:55 07/31/07 (17)
- A few observations on your observations - clarkjohnsen 10:10:22 08/01/07 (12)
- It is good to know - unclestu52 10:41:13 08/01/07 (11)
- RE: It is good to know - Posy Rorer 11:34:27 08/01/07 (10)
- RE: It is good to know - unclestu52 13:45:05 08/01/07 (9)
- RE: It is good to know - Posy Rorer 22:25:56 08/01/07 (8)
- The reason I tell him to "read the book" is because he claims to own it -- EXCEPT... - clarkjohnsen 09:00:01 08/02/07 (6)
- ex nihilo nihil fit - unclestu52 13:48:45 08/02/07 (5)
- aut concilio aut ense - Posy Rorer 22:57:11 08/02/07 (4)
- Yes; now you see what I mean. Good try, though, and thanks, but he's irredeemable. nt - clarkjohnsen 07:23:26 08/03/07 (2)
- The Clark sidestep.... - unclestu52 12:14:37 08/03/07 (0)
- Mind you, I added that before I had read his attempt at an indictment of me below. Lordy!! nt - clarkjohnsen 07:25:41 08/03/07 (0)
- My apologies for having - unclestu52 00:48:34 08/03/07 (0)
- Well, I am glad - unclestu52 22:38:26 08/01/07 (0)
- Did you know.... - unclestu52 19:51:37 07/31/07 (3)
- RE: Did you know.... - Posy Rorer 21:44:17 07/31/07 (2)
- "isn't the order of polarity locked into the recording?" No! - clarkjohnsen 11:35:43 08/01/07 (0)
- RE: Did you know.... - unclestu52 01:11:21 08/01/07 (0)
- Re Clark's Mathematical Model & The Mars Lunar Lander - unclestu52 22:19:43 07/30/07 (3)
- RE: Re Clark's Mathematical Model & The Mars Lunar Lander - Posy Rorer 00:31:26 07/31/07 (2)
- Lest this silliness continue... - clarkjohnsen 08:08:33 07/31/07 (1)
- Let's dance - unclestu52 13:54:09 07/31/07 (0)
- Re: "a degree in physics" - tlyyra 14:34:30 07/30/07 (0)
- You and Posy make quite a couple! - SF tech 11:17:50 07/30/07 (1)
- Naw, I think you & rlw make a much better couple. - Posy Rorer 21:51:56 07/30/07 (0)
- "Clark came up with it after many nights laboring over it, and I had to like -beg- him for it for days..." - SF tech 15:48:47 07/26/07 (7)
- Awww, whatsamatter, jr.? Did they kick you out of the PR Fan Club for attacking the less obsessive trolls? - Posy Rorer 23:56:27 07/26/07 (6)
- "I got a surprise waiting for you in my cabana...." -- Posy Rorer - SF tech 00:07:56 07/27/07 (5)
- "Are you human?" - SF Tech - Posy Rorer 06:23:17 07/27/07 (4)
- Witnessing your mental condition deteriorate is strangely fascinating... - SF tech 11:29:56 07/30/07 (3)
- LOL! Is anyone interested in taking up a collection to buy our "SF Tech" troll a sense of humour? - Posy Rorer 20:52:04 07/30/07 (2)
- LMAO! You *are* funny! - SF tech 22:59:46 07/30/07 (1)
- Gee, thanks. You are too. Never deliberately, alas. -nt - Posy Rorer 11:20:07 07/31/07 (0)
- RE: "admittedly I haven't tried all of their tweaks." - geoffkait 14:05:22 07/26/07 (17)
- Geoff - unclestu52 22:20:15 07/26/07 (15)
- RE: Negative or no results - geoffkait 02:14:20 07/27/07 (14)
- ( ? ) - unclestu52 19:49:57 07/27/07 (13)
- Don't do it Stu! I'm counting on you... - rick_m 12:44:32 07/28/07 (0)
- RE: ( ? ) - May Belt 08:45:26 07/28/07 (11)
- Testing advice? - rick_m 12:22:08 07/28/07 (10)
- RE: Testing advice? - May Belt 08:00:48 07/29/07 (9)
- RE: Testing advice? - rick_m 10:47:25 07/29/07 (8)
- "I am a firm believer in... the power of suggestion." Indeed, and... - clarkjohnsen 08:04:42 07/30/07 (7)
- Us? - rick_m 10:24:32 07/30/07 (6)
- "Keep an open mind." - rick m - Posy Rorer 21:09:26 07/30/07 (4)
- RE: "Keep an open mind." - rick m - rick_m 23:06:58 07/30/07 (3)
- RE: "Keep an open mind." - rick m - Posy Rorer 23:33:50 07/30/07 (2)
- It's nice to be loved... - rlw 09:04:55 08/05/07 (0)
- Nice choice for "mockworthy". nt - clarkjohnsen 08:33:48 07/31/07 (0)
- "Question your beliefs. Question Authority. Keep an open mind. Have a beer." - SF tech 17:25:36 07/30/07 (0)
- I never claimed to be superman ( NT ) - unclestu52 17:59:49 07/26/07 (0)
- I believe Einstein - unclestu52 21:59:01 07/25/07 (2)
- Illogical appeals to Einstein are a hallmark of bad thinking. - Enophile 22:08:23 07/25/07 (1)
- Cheer up! - unclestu52 01:58:02 07/26/07 (0)
- First, quick response -- more to come. May, is there *anything* one can do to one's system... - clarkjohnsen 14:15:24 07/23/07 (45)
- RE: First, quick response -- more to come. May, is there *anything* one can do to one's system... - May Belt 08:03:31 07/25/07 (19)
- RE: First, quick response -- more to come. May, is there *anything* one can do to one's system... - rick_m 10:16:39 07/25/07 (0)
- The examples you offer are geared towards a Beltist explanation. And... - clarkjohnsen 09:06:10 07/25/07 (17)
- RE: The examples you offer are geared towards a Beltist explanation. And... - Posy Rorer 14:46:58 07/25/07 (15)
- You write as though I'm denying the Beltist phenomena; I am not. I'm just trying to... - clarkjohnsen 08:28:45 07/26/07 (14)
- My argument is the lotion tweak is a Beltist tweak. And nothing else. - Posy Rorer 11:22:30 07/26/07 (13)
- How we gonna separate the variables? nt - clarkjohnsen 07:53:28 07/30/07 (6)
- Easy. Test passive devices in another room. nt - Posy Rorer 22:04:53 07/30/07 (5)
- Do we know that such a move obliterates the effect? Maybe go next door? nt - clarkjohnsen 08:41:19 07/31/07 (4)
- Yes, well going or placing the DUT next door will obliterate both conventional and Beltist effects. -nt - Posy Rorer 12:55:47 07/31/07 (3)
- What if "next door" is an apartment and thier rooms are contiguous with yours? (Just askin'...) - clarkjohnsen 09:40:29 08/01/07 (2)
- RE: What if "next door" is an apartment and thier rooms are contiguous with yours? (Just askin'...) - May Belt 12:37:29 08/01/07 (1)
- "Science does not begin to touch a fraction of how and why things work." No argument here! And... - clarkjohnsen 12:44:37 08/01/07 (0)
- Wow. That was quite a string of insults! A+ for effort! - Enophile 14:53:34 07/26/07 (5)
- Awww shucks, tweren't nuthin'.... No, really. - Posy Rorer 21:40:45 07/26/07 (4)
- Poser, showing his reflective, thoughtful side.... - rlw 07:43:21 07/30/07 (2)
- RLW's reflective side: "Make the giant, manly leap and show up on my doorstep while runnin' yer big mouth." - Posy Rorer 15:35:39 07/31/07 (0)
- SF Tech troll, have you met the Richard L. Wainwright troll? - Posy Rorer 22:00:58 07/30/07 (0)
- Posy, that is quite a manifesto you have there... - SF tech 23:32:47 07/26/07 (0)
- RE: The examples you offer are geared towards a Beltist explanation. And... - May Belt 10:34:38 07/25/07 (0)
- RE: First, quick response -- more to come. May, is there *anything* one can do to one's system... - May Belt 15:21:34 07/23/07 (24)
- "So, Clark, I ask you." And ye shall be answered. - clarkjohnsen 10:57:07 07/24/07 (9)
- RE: "So, Clark, I ask you." And ye shall be answered. - May Belt 14:52:56 07/24/07 (8)
- And more, and more - clarkjohnsen 09:13:26 07/25/07 (5)
- RE: And more, and more - May Belt 03:51:15 07/26/07 (1)
- Thanks for the essay, it elucidates the phenomenon wonderfully. - clarkjohnsen 08:18:56 07/30/07 (0)
- Perfect question. The whole jar being in the room or the house should have a proportionately large impact. - Enophile 10:36:07 07/25/07 (2)
- RE: Perfect question. The whole jar being in the room or the house should have a proportionately large impact. - Posy Rorer 15:12:19 07/25/07 (1)
- Thanks, your answer is logically consistent. We gotta drink and listen together. - Enophile 15:22:22 07/25/07 (0)
- RE: "So, Clark, I ask you." And ye shall be answered. - May Belt 08:01:57 07/25/07 (1)
- A static charge - unclestu52 19:14:29 07/25/07 (0)
- You presume, of course,... - rlw 10:53:25 07/24/07 (12)
- RE: You presume, of course,... - May Belt 14:49:06 07/24/07 (7)
- Only because Posy claimed that was my "problem"... - rlw 09:46:34 07/26/07 (6)
- RE: Only because Posy claimed that was my "problem"... - May Belt 02:01:32 07/27/07 (5)
- Sorry, May, the record speaks for itself... - rlw 05:39:40 07/27/07 (4)
- Yes it does. And the record shows that you're an insincere troll with a tweak-bashing agenda. - Posy Rorer 08:59:40 07/28/07 (2)
- Man, I'm LOVIN' this! - rlw 15:38:57 07/29/07 (1)
- Great job, "rlw". Thanks for confirming your troll status. You can be safely ignored now. -nt - Posy Rorer 22:11:28 07/30/07 (0)
- RE: Sorry, May, the record speaks for itself... - May Belt 08:42:03 07/27/07 (0)
- "I'll wait while you collect your thoughts..." Condescending, patronizing, fatuous... - clarkjohnsen 11:01:16 07/24/07 (3)
- Well, well, Mr. Johnsen... - rlw 11:12:27 07/24/07 (2)
- It's your "attitude*, dude, not your questions. nt - clarkjohnsen 11:30:45 07/24/07 (1)
- You might be on to something there, dear boy... - rlw 11:46:34 07/24/07 (0)
- "As a 'professional in audio' one cannot 'flounder around'" - pburant 08:43:35 07/24/07 (0)
Follow Ups
- You write as though I'm denying the Beltist phenomena; I am not. I'm just trying to... - clarkjohnsen 08:28:45 07/26/07 (14)
- My argument is the lotion tweak is a Beltist tweak. And nothing else. - Posy Rorer 11:22:30 07/26/07 (13)
- How we gonna separate the variables? nt - clarkjohnsen 07:53:28 07/30/07 (6)
- Easy. Test passive devices in another room. nt - Posy Rorer 22:04:53 07/30/07 (5)
- Do we know that such a move obliterates the effect? Maybe go next door? nt - clarkjohnsen 08:41:19 07/31/07 (4)
- Yes, well going or placing the DUT next door will obliterate both conventional and Beltist effects. -nt - Posy Rorer 12:55:47 07/31/07 (3)
- What if "next door" is an apartment and thier rooms are contiguous with yours? (Just askin'...) - clarkjohnsen 09:40:29 08/01/07 (2)
- RE: What if "next door" is an apartment and thier rooms are contiguous with yours? (Just askin'...) - May Belt 12:37:29 08/01/07 (1)
- "Science does not begin to touch a fraction of how and why things work." No argument here! And... - clarkjohnsen 12:44:37 08/01/07 (0)
- Wow. That was quite a string of insults! A+ for effort! - Enophile 14:53:34 07/26/07 (5)
- Awww shucks, tweren't nuthin'.... No, really. - Posy Rorer 21:40:45 07/26/07 (4)
- Poser, showing his reflective, thoughtful side.... - rlw 07:43:21 07/30/07 (2)
- RLW's reflective side: "Make the giant, manly leap and show up on my doorstep while runnin' yer big mouth." - Posy Rorer 15:35:39 07/31/07 (0)
- SF Tech troll, have you met the Richard L. Wainwright troll? - Posy Rorer 22:00:58 07/30/07 (0)
- Posy, that is quite a manifesto you have there... - SF tech 23:32:47 07/26/07 (0)