In Reply to: I mean Warner dropping PCM. posted by Jim Pearce on January 28, 2003 at 11:36:45:
Before anyone answers, I am not talking about copyright issues or someone's ability or inability to hear watermarks: do you think it's in the best interest of the artist to alter or add to that artist's original intent (that intent being the creation of music)?
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- question - Joe Murphy Jr 11:49:11 01/28/03 (31)
- In the artist's interest no, but with labels such as Warner, the artist doesn't own or control it. - Michi 17:34:25 01/28/03 (3)
- Why not ? - Frank 01:37:35 01/29/03 (2)
- I know. That's what I used to encode Verance for. - Michi 05:25:04 01/31/03 (1)
- Re: I know. That's what I used to encode Verance for. - Frank 06:20:00 01/31/03 (0)
- Re: question - Frank 12:07:42 01/28/03 (26)
- It was a "yes" or "no" question - Joe Murphy Jr 16:01:19 01/28/03 (25)
- Yes - Frank 09:11:27 01/29/03 (13)
- Thank you for your honest answer. - Joe Murphy Jr 11:15:45 01/29/03 (1)
- Re: Thank you for your honest answer. - Frank 12:12:11 01/29/03 (0)
- they won't - tunenut 10:05:06 01/29/03 (10)
- Not yet. - Frank 11:18:55 01/29/03 (9)
- you are right but... - tunenut 11:27:10 01/29/03 (8)
- Tunenut, don't be too quick to generalize. - Jim Pearce 11:39:50 01/29/03 (7)
- just for fun... - tunenut 22:48:05 01/29/03 (2)
- Re: just for fun... - Frank 07:28:12 01/31/03 (1)
- this is just for fun... - tunenut 09:29:41 01/31/03 (0)
- steganography is here to stay... - tunenut 13:12:47 01/29/03 (3)
- Re: steganography is here to stay... - Frank 13:46:00 01/29/03 (1)
- I have a guitar... - tunenut 13:55:42 01/29/03 (0)
- Well stated. nt - Methos 13:25:11 01/29/03 (0)
- Artists sign their paintings. - Jim Pearce 21:42:29 01/28/03 (10)
- A watermark is NOT an artist's signature. - Joe Murphy Jr 11:36:07 01/29/03 (2)
- As a photographer, its easy. - Jim Pearce 12:16:30 01/29/03 (1)
- Then I speak to you as BOTH -- - Joe Murphy Jr 17:31:53 01/29/03 (0)
- a spurious comparison - tunenut 10:11:03 01/29/03 (6)
- I agree with your post above: it will disappear. - Jim Pearce 10:44:02 01/29/03 (5)
- no I can't... - tunenut 11:13:20 01/29/03 (4)
- Chicken egg or egg chicken problem - Frank 12:19:27 01/29/03 (3)
- the egg of course!!! (NT) - tunenut 12:59:17 01/29/03 (2)
- Marilyn vos Savant had a well-reasoned answer to that question in her column.. - Methos 14:34:08 01/29/03 (1)
- there should be a separate board for the chicken/egg discussion... - tunenut 14:37:59 01/29/03 (0)