In Reply to: It was a "yes" or "no" question posted by Joe Murphy Jr on January 28, 2003 at 16:01:19:
Would be my answer. It will give the artist the best option in collecting royalties and preventing copying. If recorders which act upon the embedded instructions in the watermark become commonplace in the future.You suggest that the watermark is limiting artists creativity and music making. I have a surpise for you: it does not.
To me watermarking is less objectionable than severe dynamic range compression and intended digital clipping often used to 'enhance' the listening experience.
I don't like it but can live with it. It doesn't prevent me from enjoying music.
"Please point out one instance where I have argued "against" the DVD-A format. "
Why should I ? If you re read my question you will see that I didn't accuse you of arguing against the DVD Audio format.Frank
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Yes - Frank 09:11:27 01/29/03 (13)
- Thank you for your honest answer. - Joe Murphy Jr 11:15:45 01/29/03 (1)
- Re: Thank you for your honest answer. - Frank 12:12:11 01/29/03 (0)
- they won't - tunenut 10:05:06 01/29/03 (10)
- Not yet. - Frank 11:18:55 01/29/03 (9)
- you are right but... - tunenut 11:27:10 01/29/03 (8)
- Tunenut, don't be too quick to generalize. - Jim Pearce 11:39:50 01/29/03 (7)
- just for fun... - tunenut 22:48:05 01/29/03 (2)
- Re: just for fun... - Frank 07:28:12 01/31/03 (1)
- this is just for fun... - tunenut 09:29:41 01/31/03 (0)
- steganography is here to stay... - tunenut 13:12:47 01/29/03 (3)
- Re: steganography is here to stay... - Frank 13:46:00 01/29/03 (1)
- I have a guitar... - tunenut 13:55:42 01/29/03 (0)
- Well stated. nt - Methos 13:25:11 01/29/03 (0)