In Reply to: RE: Once again, more false information from the guy is supposed to be against false information posted by J. Phelan on April 17, 2017 at 12:05:54:
"Prove I'm wrong."
Fine. since you made extreme assertion of "none" in each of your claims I will provide you with and example of 1 for each. There are more than that but 1 is all I need to prove you wrong.
https://www.tacet.de/main/seite1.php?language=en&filename=welcome.php&layout=willkommen
https://www.abbeyroad.com/mastering
"Then 'lossy' means what it says."
It says "lossy" here is what it means as applied to audio. "relating to data compression in which unnecessary information is discarded." absolutely inapplicable to vinyl.
"The entire industry knows how poor analog recording is, why they gave it up..."
You don't get to speak for the entire industry. Your steady stream of "false information" is quite ironic though given your original post.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- RE: Once again, more false information from the guy is supposed to be against false information - Analog Scott 12:45:12 04/17/17 (27)
- RE: Once again, more false information from the guy is supposed to be against false information - J. Phelan 12:48:27 04/17/17 (26)
- RE: Once again, more false information from the guy is supposed to be against false information - Analog Scott 13:13:50 04/17/17 (25)
- RE: Once again, more false information from the guy is supposed to be against false information - J. Phelan 15:22:30 04/17/17 (24)
- Once again everything you said is wrong - Analog Scott 17:08:31 04/17/17 (23)
- How does one attempt to conduct - E-Stat 17:04:46 04/20/17 (22)
- RE: How does one attempt to conduct - J. Phelan 17:11:13 04/20/17 (21)
- Speed reading has clearly failed you - E-Stat 17:29:27 04/20/17 (20)
- RE: Speed reading has clearly failed you - J. Phelan 17:39:24 04/20/17 (19)
- "False information, the point of the thread." - Analog Scott 20:50:22 04/20/17 (0)
- Honestly - E-Stat 19:06:53 04/20/17 (17)
- It's a lot like this - Analog Scott 20:53:10 04/20/17 (1)
- :) -nt - E-Stat 21:03:54 04/20/17 (0)
- RE: Honestly - J. Phelan 19:53:10 04/20/17 (14)
- RE: Honestly - E-Stat 20:48:27 04/20/17 (13)
- RE: Honestly - J. Phelan 21:19:28 04/20/17 (12)
- With every post - E-Stat 05:58:55 04/21/17 (11)
- RE: With every post - J. Phelan 07:07:32 04/21/17 (10)
- Yet another failure to understand what you read - E-Stat 07:27:20 04/21/17 (2)
- RE: Yet another failure to understand what you read - J. Phelan 07:42:55 04/21/17 (1)
- More Whack-a-mole comments - E-Stat 08:14:00 04/21/17 (0)
- The majority of CDs have a dynamic range of about 5 db - Analog Scott 07:13:17 04/21/17 (6)
- RE: The majority of CDs have a dynamic range of about 5 db - J. Phelan 07:25:34 04/21/17 (5)
- RE: The majority of CDs have a dynamic range of about 5 db - Analog Scott 08:45:21 04/21/17 (4)
- RE: The majority of CDs have a dynamic range of about 5 db - J. Phelan 11:18:46 04/21/17 (3)
- RE: The majority of CDs have a dynamic range of about 5 db - Analog Scott 14:08:53 04/21/17 (2)
- RE: The majority of CDs have a dynamic range of about 5 db - J. Phelan 17:31:20 04/21/17 (1)
- RE: The majority of CDs have a dynamic range of about 5 db - Analog Scott 00:58:07 04/22/17 (0)