|
Critic's Corner Discuss a review. Provide constructive feedback. Talk to the industry. |
|
|
|
Critic's Corner Discuss a review. Provide constructive feedback. Talk to the industry. |
|
In Reply to: Now you are just being silly posted by Analog Scott on April 17, 2017 at 06:06:12:
To Analog Scott:No classical/jazz record label (in the world) uses analog recording. No pro studio uses LP to hear their masters. Analog recording is a lossy system - that is un-contested.
I said "false" because Valin said digital "cannot sample music correctly". FALSE - it does.
There is a reason why most folks dumped LP - it is NOT a high-quality format.
In order of accuracy, here is a list of playback systems. My opinion of course.
Solid-state drive w/ digital amplifier (digital pulse-widths, not analog switching-amp commonly reviewed)
Solid-state drive w/discrete R2R DAC
Hard-disk w/R2R
Optical disc/CDRs w/R2R
Any digital drive w/hybrid DAC
Analog tape 30 ips
Cylinder
45rpm/78rpm
LP -idler drive
LP -direct-drive
LP -belt-drive
Cassette/8 track
Edits: 04/17/17 04/17/17 04/17/17 04/17/17 04/17/17 04/17/17 04/17/17 04/17/17 04/17/17 04/17/17 04/18/17
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- RE: Now you are just being silly - J. Phelan 11:37:31 04/17/17 (30)
- Once again, more false information from the guy is supposed to be against false information - Analog Scott 11:47:01 04/17/17 (29)
- RE: Once again, more false information from the guy is supposed to be against false information - J. Phelan 12:05:54 04/17/17 (28)
- RE: Once again, more false information from the guy is supposed to be against false information - Analog Scott 12:45:12 04/17/17 (27)
- RE: Once again, more false information from the guy is supposed to be against false information - J. Phelan 12:48:27 04/17/17 (26)
- RE: Once again, more false information from the guy is supposed to be against false information - Analog Scott 13:13:50 04/17/17 (25)
- RE: Once again, more false information from the guy is supposed to be against false information - J. Phelan 15:22:30 04/17/17 (24)
- Once again everything you said is wrong - Analog Scott 17:08:31 04/17/17 (23)
- How does one attempt to conduct - E-Stat 17:04:46 04/20/17 (22)
- RE: How does one attempt to conduct - J. Phelan 17:11:13 04/20/17 (21)
- Speed reading has clearly failed you - E-Stat 17:29:27 04/20/17 (20)
- RE: Speed reading has clearly failed you - J. Phelan 17:39:24 04/20/17 (19)
- "False information, the point of the thread." - Analog Scott 20:50:22 04/20/17 (0)
- Honestly - E-Stat 19:06:53 04/20/17 (17)
- It's a lot like this - Analog Scott 20:53:10 04/20/17 (1)
- :) -nt - E-Stat 21:03:54 04/20/17 (0)
- RE: Honestly - J. Phelan 19:53:10 04/20/17 (14)
- RE: Honestly - E-Stat 20:48:27 04/20/17 (13)
- RE: Honestly - J. Phelan 21:19:28 04/20/17 (12)
- With every post - E-Stat 05:58:55 04/21/17 (11)
- RE: With every post - J. Phelan 07:07:32 04/21/17 (10)
- Yet another failure to understand what you read - E-Stat 07:27:20 04/21/17 (2)
- RE: Yet another failure to understand what you read - J. Phelan 07:42:55 04/21/17 (1)
- More Whack-a-mole comments - E-Stat 08:14:00 04/21/17 (0)
- The majority of CDs have a dynamic range of about 5 db - Analog Scott 07:13:17 04/21/17 (6)
- RE: The majority of CDs have a dynamic range of about 5 db - J. Phelan 07:25:34 04/21/17 (5)
- RE: The majority of CDs have a dynamic range of about 5 db - Analog Scott 08:45:21 04/21/17 (4)
- RE: The majority of CDs have a dynamic range of about 5 db - J. Phelan 11:18:46 04/21/17 (3)
- RE: The majority of CDs have a dynamic range of about 5 db - Analog Scott 14:08:53 04/21/17 (2)
- RE: The majority of CDs have a dynamic range of about 5 db - J. Phelan 17:31:20 04/21/17 (1)
- RE: The majority of CDs have a dynamic range of about 5 db - Analog Scott 00:58:07 04/22/17 (0)
Top of Page ]
[ Contact Us ]
[ Support/Wish List ]
[ Copyright © 2024, Audio Asylum, all rights reserved ]
