Critic's Corner Discuss a review. Provide constructive feedback. Talk to the industry. |
|
In Reply to: RE: Several problems digital has that analog seems to not have: posted by J. Phelan on April 17, 2017 at 15:35:59:
Analog on playback is limited to 15-16 kHz, not 35 kHz.
If that were true, the CD-4 records produced in the 70s would never have worked.
The second half of his statement, however, is true:
"Specifically, the frequency bandwidth of LPs and FM multiplex broadcasts were limited from 30 Hz to 15 KHz.
Yes, FM radio was limited by convention to that range. Why? Because, like the CD-4 recordings, the other channel rode on a higher frequency carrier. In the case of multiplexed FM, it is 19khz, while the back channels of CD-4 rode on a 30kHz carrier.
The poor man must be deaf. Here are some other *jewels*:
"192 KBPS is considered "CD quality." No human can hear any difference between an MP3 at that rate (or higher) and a CD. "
"CD quality is so accurate that you can't hear any difference between a properly-recorded CD and the original microphone feed."
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups Full ThreadTopic - Beware of false information - J. Phelan 16:54:24 04/15/17 (117)
- RE: Beware of false information - BubbaMike 11:47:33 04/19/17 (0)
- WARNING!: Confused Cats and Dogs at it again.. - 3+4=5 09:29:16 04/18/17 (6)
- "Is ANY of this news???" - Analog Scott 10:22:43 04/18/17 (5)
- YES. It is called 'barking up the wrong tree'. or 'Cat herding' your choice. - 3+4=5 11:59:00 04/18/17 (4)
- "Now IMO if the 'misinformation actually mattered." - Analog Scott 12:36:18 04/18/17 (3)
- You must start the trend!.. Abandon away.... nt - 3+4=5 12:50:21 04/18/17 (2)
- ctually I already have abandoned most of the audio and music forums - Analog Scott 06:31:34 04/19/17 (1)
- Me too! I quit several of them a few years ago, and am a happier person for it. nt - 3+4=5 08:27:26 04/19/17 (0)
- Recurring theme with you - morricab 08:03:14 04/18/17 (1)
- RE: Recurring theme with you - Ralph 10:16:04 04/18/17 (0)
- Soon enough these posts will make me want to watch an old movie, but what? - bjh 07:12:43 04/18/17 (5)
- but a 'real' movie ,with spools of film, a projector to a screen? or a DIGITAL COPY? nt - 3+4=5 13:16:39 04/18/17 (0)
- RE: Soon enough these posts will make me want to watch an old movie, but what? - J. Phelan 07:23:37 04/18/17 (3)
- RE: Soon enough these posts will make me want to watch an old movie, but what? - morricab 08:05:23 04/18/17 (2)
- HAHA... "for the record" - MannyE 10:16:20 04/18/17 (1)
- RE: HAHA... "for the record" - morricab 01:11:46 04/19/17 (0)
- Several problems digital has that analog seems to not have: - Ralph 13:18:04 04/17/17 (40)
- RE: Several problems digital has that analog seems to not have: - tomservo 07:20:33 04/19/17 (11)
- well, yeah and no. - Analog Scott 12:00:15 04/19/17 (0)
- RE: Generation Loss? - Ralph 08:03:40 04/19/17 (9)
- RE: Generation Loss? - tomservo 08:42:31 04/19/17 (8)
- RE: Generation Loss? - Ralph 09:02:41 04/19/17 (7)
- RE: Generation Loss? - J. Phelan 10:54:49 04/19/17 (1)
- "sound accuracy movement?" - Analog Scott 12:02:16 04/19/17 (0)
- RE: Generation Loss? - tomservo 10:40:27 04/19/17 (4)
- +1 nt - Ralph 12:25:50 04/19/17 (3)
- RE: +1 nt - J. Phelan 14:24:40 04/19/17 (2)
- He sure seemed to have a lot of them laying around when I last saw him... nt - Ralph 14:53:51 04/19/17 (1)
- RE: He sure seemed to have a lot of them laying around when I last saw him... nt - J. Phelan 14:59:19 04/19/17 (0)
- RE: Several problems digital has that analog seems to not have: - J. Phelan 15:35:59 04/17/17 (27)
- Revisionist history - E-Stat 06:56:34 04/19/17 (0)
- RE: "Analog on playback is limited to 15-16 kHz, not 35 kHz." FINALLY! - Ivan303 16:48:17 04/17/17 (0)
- RE: Several problems digital has that analog seems to not have: - Tre' 16:33:27 04/17/17 (24)
- We need to find out what... - mkuller 20:47:56 04/17/17 (0)
- RE: Several problems digital has that analog seems to not have: - J. Phelan 16:46:32 04/17/17 (22)
- This is incorrect! - Ralph 10:14:03 04/18/17 (0)
- RE: Several problems digital has that analog seems to not have: - J. Phelan 17:32:53 04/17/17 (19)
- RE: Several problems digital has that analog seems to not have: - Tre' 17:57:29 04/17/17 (18)
- RE: Several problems digital has that analog seems to not have: - morricab 07:59:36 04/18/17 (0)
- RE: Several problems digital has that analog seems to not have: - J. Phelan 18:07:20 04/17/17 (16)
- wrong again - Analog Scott 18:11:12 04/17/17 (15)
- He seems to have a way of doing that. nt - Ralph 10:15:21 04/18/17 (0)
- RE: wrong again - J. Phelan 18:17:41 04/17/17 (13)
- RE: wrong again - Analog Scott 20:50:29 04/17/17 (0)
- RE: wrong again - Tre' 18:31:32 04/17/17 (11)
- RE: wrong again - J. Phelan 19:10:54 04/17/17 (10)
- RE: wrong again - Tre' 07:31:03 04/18/17 (5)
- RE: wrong again - J. Phelan 11:22:51 04/18/17 (1)
- Perhaps you should read your own *references* more closely - E-Stat 07:24:11 04/19/17 (0)
- RE: wrong again - SpotcheckBilly12345 08:00:27 04/18/17 (2)
- Thanks! nt - Ralph 10:24:29 04/18/17 (0)
- That's good advice. Thanks. (nt) - Tre' 09:19:48 04/18/17 (0)
- RE: wrong again - Analog Scott 20:58:26 04/17/17 (3)
- RE: wrong again - J. Phelan 06:53:54 04/18/17 (2)
- Bwahahaha - E-Stat 05:48:00 04/19/17 (0)
- Who is Roger Sanders? - Analog Scott 06:58:21 04/18/17 (0)
- RE: "This one is right off Google"... - Ivan303 16:49:40 04/17/17 (0)
- RE: Beware of false information - Tre' 10:06:57 04/17/17 (5)
- RE: Beware of false information - John Atkinson 13:16:38 04/17/17 (4)
- I was being sarcastic. - Tre' 14:43:16 04/17/17 (3)
- RE: I was being sarcastic. - John Atkinson 09:24:38 04/18/17 (2)
- Written English really needs a punctuation mark indicating sarcasm/irony... really!. - 3+4=5 13:21:29 04/18/17 (0)
- Good point. (nt) - Tre' 11:17:02 04/18/17 (0)
- Analog/LP are clearly worse than digital - fmak 09:24:50 04/17/17 (0)
- It is ironic that you would assert "false information" in a post condemning false information - Analog Scott 06:01:29 04/17/17 (0)
- While you're at it, got any thoughts on MQA? - Ivan303 12:17:19 04/16/17 (0)
- So it goes. Nt - geoffkait 10:58:36 04/16/17 (0)
- Don't confuse opinion with information... - tketcham 04:13:52 04/16/17 (45)
- RE: Don't confuse opinion with information... - J. Phelan 07:15:19 04/16/17 (44)
- basis of opinion... - hifitommy 23:51:08 04/16/17 (2)
- Reassemble hamburger into meat: feed it to a pig. LOL - 3+4=5 09:17:06 04/18/17 (1)
- feed it - hifitommy 14:56:19 04/18/17 (0)
- RE: Don't confuse opinion with information... - tketcham 14:57:36 04/16/17 (0)
- Another vote for opinion.... - Ivan303 12:15:13 04/16/17 (0)
- Yep, the quote is 'OPINION'. not fact. So you prove you are wrong! LOL - 3+4=5 07:17:18 04/16/17 (38)
- RE: Yep, the quote is 'OPINION'. not fact. So you prove you are wrong! LOL - J. Phelan 14:58:56 04/16/17 (37)
- You've obviously led a sheltered life. - Dave Pogue 17:15:49 04/16/17 (36)
- RE: You've obviously led a sheltered life. - J. Phelan 18:45:52 04/16/17 (35)
- RE: You've obviously led a sheltered life. - Jeffrey Lee 12:19:46 04/17/17 (1)
- RE: You've obviously led a sheltered life. - J. Phelan 12:40:29 04/17/17 (0)
- Now you are just being silly - Analog Scott 06:06:12 04/17/17 (32)
- RE: Now you are just being silly - J. Phelan 11:37:31 04/17/17 (30)
- Once again, more false information from the guy is supposed to be against false information - Analog Scott 11:47:01 04/17/17 (29)
- RE: Once again, more false information from the guy is supposed to be against false information - J. Phelan 12:05:54 04/17/17 (28)
- RE: Once again, more false information from the guy is supposed to be against false information - Analog Scott 12:45:12 04/17/17 (27)
- RE: Once again, more false information from the guy is supposed to be against false information - J. Phelan 12:48:27 04/17/17 (26)
- RE: Once again, more false information from the guy is supposed to be against false information - Analog Scott 13:13:50 04/17/17 (25)
- RE: Once again, more false information from the guy is supposed to be against false information - J. Phelan 15:22:30 04/17/17 (24)
- Once again everything you said is wrong - Analog Scott 17:08:31 04/17/17 (23)
- How does one attempt to conduct - E-Stat 17:04:46 04/20/17 (22)
- RE: How does one attempt to conduct - J. Phelan 17:11:13 04/20/17 (21)
- Speed reading has clearly failed you - E-Stat 17:29:27 04/20/17 (20)
- RE: Speed reading has clearly failed you - J. Phelan 17:39:24 04/20/17 (19)
- "False information, the point of the thread." - Analog Scott 20:50:22 04/20/17 (0)
- Honestly - E-Stat 19:06:53 04/20/17 (17)
- It's a lot like this - Analog Scott 20:53:10 04/20/17 (1)
- :) -nt - E-Stat 21:03:54 04/20/17 (0)
- RE: Honestly - J. Phelan 19:53:10 04/20/17 (14)
- RE: Honestly - E-Stat 20:48:27 04/20/17 (13)
- RE: Honestly - J. Phelan 21:19:28 04/20/17 (12)
- With every post - E-Stat 05:58:55 04/21/17 (11)
- RE: With every post - J. Phelan 07:07:32 04/21/17 (10)
- Yet another failure to understand what you read - E-Stat 07:27:20 04/21/17 (2)
- RE: Yet another failure to understand what you read - J. Phelan 07:42:55 04/21/17 (1)
- More Whack-a-mole comments - E-Stat 08:14:00 04/21/17 (0)
- The majority of CDs have a dynamic range of about 5 db - Analog Scott 07:13:17 04/21/17 (6)
- RE: The majority of CDs have a dynamic range of about 5 db - J. Phelan 07:25:34 04/21/17 (5)
- RE: The majority of CDs have a dynamic range of about 5 db - Analog Scott 08:45:21 04/21/17 (4)
- RE: The majority of CDs have a dynamic range of about 5 db - J. Phelan 11:18:46 04/21/17 (3)
- RE: The majority of CDs have a dynamic range of about 5 db - Analog Scott 14:08:53 04/21/17 (2)
- RE: The majority of CDs have a dynamic range of about 5 db - J. Phelan 17:31:20 04/21/17 (1)
- RE: The majority of CDs have a dynamic range of about 5 db - Analog Scott 00:58:07 04/22/17 (0)
- +1...(nt) - mkuller 08:11:12 04/17/17 (0)
- Don't feed the trolls. nt - viridian 19:04:31 04/15/17 (0)
- wow.. you have an axe to grind.. LOL - 3+4=5 18:20:50 04/15/17 (0)
- RE: Beware of false information - J. Phelan 16:59:47 04/15/17 (1)
- Your right! No one listens to records . . . - hawkmoon 18:14:47 04/15/17 (0)
Follow Ups
- Revisionist history - E-Stat 06:56:34 04/19/17 (0)