Critic's Corner Discuss a review. Provide constructive feedback. Talk to the industry. |
|
In Reply to: "Is ANY of this news???" posted by Analog Scott on April 18, 2017 at 10:22:43:
Now IMO if the 'misinformation actually mattered. and was not just a cry for help, in the dark... or an attempt to start a lot of quibbling among the rabble..
I might agree with you on helping to correct the 'misinformation'.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups Full ThreadTopic - Beware of false information - J. Phelan 16:54:24 04/15/17 (117)
- RE: Beware of false information - BubbaMike 11:47:33 04/19/17 (0)
- WARNING!: Confused Cats and Dogs at it again.. - 3+4=5 09:29:16 04/18/17 (6)
- "Is ANY of this news???" - Analog Scott 10:22:43 04/18/17 (5)
- YES. It is called 'barking up the wrong tree'. or 'Cat herding' your choice. - 3+4=5 11:59:00 04/18/17 (4)
- "Now IMO if the 'misinformation actually mattered." - Analog Scott 12:36:18 04/18/17 (3)
- You must start the trend!.. Abandon away.... nt - 3+4=5 12:50:21 04/18/17 (2)
- ctually I already have abandoned most of the audio and music forums - Analog Scott 06:31:34 04/19/17 (1)
- Me too! I quit several of them a few years ago, and am a happier person for it. nt - 3+4=5 08:27:26 04/19/17 (0)
- Recurring theme with you - morricab 08:03:14 04/18/17 (1)
- RE: Recurring theme with you - Ralph 10:16:04 04/18/17 (0)
- Soon enough these posts will make me want to watch an old movie, but what? - bjh 07:12:43 04/18/17 (5)
- but a 'real' movie ,with spools of film, a projector to a screen? or a DIGITAL COPY? nt - 3+4=5 13:16:39 04/18/17 (0)
- RE: Soon enough these posts will make me want to watch an old movie, but what? - J. Phelan 07:23:37 04/18/17 (3)
- RE: Soon enough these posts will make me want to watch an old movie, but what? - morricab 08:05:23 04/18/17 (2)
- HAHA... "for the record" - MannyE 10:16:20 04/18/17 (1)
- RE: HAHA... "for the record" - morricab 01:11:46 04/19/17 (0)
- Several problems digital has that analog seems to not have: - Ralph 13:18:04 04/17/17 (40)
- RE: Several problems digital has that analog seems to not have: - tomservo 07:20:33 04/19/17 (11)
- well, yeah and no. - Analog Scott 12:00:15 04/19/17 (0)
- RE: Generation Loss? - Ralph 08:03:40 04/19/17 (9)
- RE: Generation Loss? - tomservo 08:42:31 04/19/17 (8)
- RE: Generation Loss? - Ralph 09:02:41 04/19/17 (7)
- RE: Generation Loss? - J. Phelan 10:54:49 04/19/17 (1)
- "sound accuracy movement?" - Analog Scott 12:02:16 04/19/17 (0)
- RE: Generation Loss? - tomservo 10:40:27 04/19/17 (4)
- +1 nt - Ralph 12:25:50 04/19/17 (3)
- RE: +1 nt - J. Phelan 14:24:40 04/19/17 (2)
- He sure seemed to have a lot of them laying around when I last saw him... nt - Ralph 14:53:51 04/19/17 (1)
- RE: He sure seemed to have a lot of them laying around when I last saw him... nt - J. Phelan 14:59:19 04/19/17 (0)
- RE: Several problems digital has that analog seems to not have: - J. Phelan 15:35:59 04/17/17 (27)
- Revisionist history - E-Stat 06:56:34 04/19/17 (0)
- RE: "Analog on playback is limited to 15-16 kHz, not 35 kHz." FINALLY! - Ivan303 16:48:17 04/17/17 (0)
- RE: Several problems digital has that analog seems to not have: - Tre' 16:33:27 04/17/17 (24)
- We need to find out what... - mkuller 20:47:56 04/17/17 (0)
- RE: Several problems digital has that analog seems to not have: - J. Phelan 16:46:32 04/17/17 (22)
- This is incorrect! - Ralph 10:14:03 04/18/17 (0)
- RE: Several problems digital has that analog seems to not have: - J. Phelan 17:32:53 04/17/17 (19)
- RE: Several problems digital has that analog seems to not have: - Tre' 17:57:29 04/17/17 (18)
- RE: Several problems digital has that analog seems to not have: - morricab 07:59:36 04/18/17 (0)
- RE: Several problems digital has that analog seems to not have: - J. Phelan 18:07:20 04/17/17 (16)
- wrong again - Analog Scott 18:11:12 04/17/17 (15)
- He seems to have a way of doing that. nt - Ralph 10:15:21 04/18/17 (0)
- RE: wrong again - J. Phelan 18:17:41 04/17/17 (13)
- RE: wrong again - Analog Scott 20:50:29 04/17/17 (0)
- RE: wrong again - Tre' 18:31:32 04/17/17 (11)
- RE: wrong again - J. Phelan 19:10:54 04/17/17 (10)
- RE: wrong again - Tre' 07:31:03 04/18/17 (5)
- RE: wrong again - J. Phelan 11:22:51 04/18/17 (1)
- Perhaps you should read your own *references* more closely - E-Stat 07:24:11 04/19/17 (0)
- RE: wrong again - SpotcheckBilly12345 08:00:27 04/18/17 (2)
- Thanks! nt - Ralph 10:24:29 04/18/17 (0)
- That's good advice. Thanks. (nt) - Tre' 09:19:48 04/18/17 (0)
- RE: wrong again - Analog Scott 20:58:26 04/17/17 (3)
- RE: wrong again - J. Phelan 06:53:54 04/18/17 (2)
- Bwahahaha - E-Stat 05:48:00 04/19/17 (0)
- Who is Roger Sanders? - Analog Scott 06:58:21 04/18/17 (0)
- RE: "This one is right off Google"... - Ivan303 16:49:40 04/17/17 (0)
- RE: Beware of false information - Tre' 10:06:57 04/17/17 (5)
- RE: Beware of false information - John Atkinson 13:16:38 04/17/17 (4)
- I was being sarcastic. - Tre' 14:43:16 04/17/17 (3)
- RE: I was being sarcastic. - John Atkinson 09:24:38 04/18/17 (2)
- Written English really needs a punctuation mark indicating sarcasm/irony... really!. - 3+4=5 13:21:29 04/18/17 (0)
- Good point. (nt) - Tre' 11:17:02 04/18/17 (0)
- Analog/LP are clearly worse than digital - fmak 09:24:50 04/17/17 (0)
- It is ironic that you would assert "false information" in a post condemning false information - Analog Scott 06:01:29 04/17/17 (0)
- While you're at it, got any thoughts on MQA? - Ivan303 12:17:19 04/16/17 (0)
- So it goes. Nt - geoffkait 10:58:36 04/16/17 (0)
- Don't confuse opinion with information... - tketcham 04:13:52 04/16/17 (45)
- RE: Don't confuse opinion with information... - J. Phelan 07:15:19 04/16/17 (44)
- basis of opinion... - hifitommy 23:51:08 04/16/17 (2)
- Reassemble hamburger into meat: feed it to a pig. LOL - 3+4=5 09:17:06 04/18/17 (1)
- feed it - hifitommy 14:56:19 04/18/17 (0)
- RE: Don't confuse opinion with information... - tketcham 14:57:36 04/16/17 (0)
- Another vote for opinion.... - Ivan303 12:15:13 04/16/17 (0)
- Yep, the quote is 'OPINION'. not fact. So you prove you are wrong! LOL - 3+4=5 07:17:18 04/16/17 (38)
- RE: Yep, the quote is 'OPINION'. not fact. So you prove you are wrong! LOL - J. Phelan 14:58:56 04/16/17 (37)
- You've obviously led a sheltered life. - Dave Pogue 17:15:49 04/16/17 (36)
- RE: You've obviously led a sheltered life. - J. Phelan 18:45:52 04/16/17 (35)
- RE: You've obviously led a sheltered life. - Jeffrey Lee 12:19:46 04/17/17 (1)
- RE: You've obviously led a sheltered life. - J. Phelan 12:40:29 04/17/17 (0)
- Now you are just being silly - Analog Scott 06:06:12 04/17/17 (32)
- RE: Now you are just being silly - J. Phelan 11:37:31 04/17/17 (30)
- Once again, more false information from the guy is supposed to be against false information - Analog Scott 11:47:01 04/17/17 (29)
- RE: Once again, more false information from the guy is supposed to be against false information - J. Phelan 12:05:54 04/17/17 (28)
- RE: Once again, more false information from the guy is supposed to be against false information - Analog Scott 12:45:12 04/17/17 (27)
- RE: Once again, more false information from the guy is supposed to be against false information - J. Phelan 12:48:27 04/17/17 (26)
- RE: Once again, more false information from the guy is supposed to be against false information - Analog Scott 13:13:50 04/17/17 (25)
- RE: Once again, more false information from the guy is supposed to be against false information - J. Phelan 15:22:30 04/17/17 (24)
- Once again everything you said is wrong - Analog Scott 17:08:31 04/17/17 (23)
- How does one attempt to conduct - E-Stat 17:04:46 04/20/17 (22)
- RE: How does one attempt to conduct - J. Phelan 17:11:13 04/20/17 (21)
- Speed reading has clearly failed you - E-Stat 17:29:27 04/20/17 (20)
- RE: Speed reading has clearly failed you - J. Phelan 17:39:24 04/20/17 (19)
- "False information, the point of the thread." - Analog Scott 20:50:22 04/20/17 (0)
- Honestly - E-Stat 19:06:53 04/20/17 (17)
- It's a lot like this - Analog Scott 20:53:10 04/20/17 (1)
- :) -nt - E-Stat 21:03:54 04/20/17 (0)
- RE: Honestly - J. Phelan 19:53:10 04/20/17 (14)
- RE: Honestly - E-Stat 20:48:27 04/20/17 (13)
- RE: Honestly - J. Phelan 21:19:28 04/20/17 (12)
- With every post - E-Stat 05:58:55 04/21/17 (11)
- RE: With every post - J. Phelan 07:07:32 04/21/17 (10)
- Yet another failure to understand what you read - E-Stat 07:27:20 04/21/17 (2)
- RE: Yet another failure to understand what you read - J. Phelan 07:42:55 04/21/17 (1)
- More Whack-a-mole comments - E-Stat 08:14:00 04/21/17 (0)
- The majority of CDs have a dynamic range of about 5 db - Analog Scott 07:13:17 04/21/17 (6)
- RE: The majority of CDs have a dynamic range of about 5 db - J. Phelan 07:25:34 04/21/17 (5)
- RE: The majority of CDs have a dynamic range of about 5 db - Analog Scott 08:45:21 04/21/17 (4)
- RE: The majority of CDs have a dynamic range of about 5 db - J. Phelan 11:18:46 04/21/17 (3)
- RE: The majority of CDs have a dynamic range of about 5 db - Analog Scott 14:08:53 04/21/17 (2)
- RE: The majority of CDs have a dynamic range of about 5 db - J. Phelan 17:31:20 04/21/17 (1)
- RE: The majority of CDs have a dynamic range of about 5 db - Analog Scott 00:58:07 04/22/17 (0)
- +1...(nt) - mkuller 08:11:12 04/17/17 (0)
- Don't feed the trolls. nt - viridian 19:04:31 04/15/17 (0)
- wow.. you have an axe to grind.. LOL - 3+4=5 18:20:50 04/15/17 (0)
- RE: Beware of false information - J. Phelan 16:59:47 04/15/17 (1)
- Your right! No one listens to records . . . - hawkmoon 18:14:47 04/15/17 (0)
Follow Ups
- YES. It is called 'barking up the wrong tree'. or 'Cat herding' your choice. - 3+4=5 11:59:00 04/18/17 (4)
- "Now IMO if the 'misinformation actually mattered." - Analog Scott 12:36:18 04/18/17 (3)
- You must start the trend!.. Abandon away.... nt - 3+4=5 12:50:21 04/18/17 (2)
- ctually I already have abandoned most of the audio and music forums - Analog Scott 06:31:34 04/19/17 (1)
- Me too! I quit several of them a few years ago, and am a happier person for it. nt - 3+4=5 08:27:26 04/19/17 (0)