In Reply to: It is you who has difficulty reading posted by E-Stat on March 3, 2011 at 06:02:26:
GMAB
-----
"A fool and his money are soon parted." --- Thomas Tusser
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Would you actually call a reviewer 'father of the high end'? - Pat D 06:14:22 03/03/11 (44)
- Yes, "The High End" is a marketing segment created by peddlers, not engineers or scientists - Tony Lauck 10:33:02 03/03/11 (41)
- Not true then... - mkuller 11:56:49 03/03/11 (40)
- RE: Not true then... - Pat D 13:34:21 03/03/11 (35)
- "I can't see that HP and other reviewers had much to do with it." - E-Stat 15:43:26 03/03/11 (11)
- RE: "I can't see that HP and other reviewers had much to do with it." - Pat D 16:22:02 03/03/11 (10)
- You know what - E-Stat 18:13:04 03/03/11 (9)
- RE: You know what - Pat D 19:26:09 03/03/11 (8)
- That's what make the reviews interesting... - mkuller 10:58:19 03/04/11 (7)
- RE: That's what make the reviews interesting... - Pat D 17:14:22 03/04/11 (6)
- If you don't understand ... - mkuller 17:49:38 03/04/11 (5)
- "Trust Your Ears" - kerr 07:03:08 03/06/11 (4)
- Straw man. - Pat D 20:35:57 03/06/11 (3)
- Actually, not a man of any composition - kerr 06:42:39 03/07/11 (2)
- RE: Actually, not a man of any composition - Pat D 08:24:05 03/07/11 (1)
- Ah - thanks! - kerr 09:14:55 03/07/11 (0)
- Julian Hirsch at least... - mkuller 15:25:28 03/03/11 (19)
- That explains much. - regmac 08:08:43 03/04/11 (6)
- Your arrow missed the mark! - Charles Hansen 19:21:52 03/06/11 (0)
- Let me relate my experience... - mkuller 10:34:11 03/04/11 (2)
- Just having you on, Mike. - regmac 11:06:12 03/04/11 (1)
- Funny... - mkuller 14:08:10 03/04/11 (0)
- "A bit self-serving, don't you think? " - E-Stat 08:47:59 03/04/11 (1)
- RE: "A bit self-serving, don't you think? " - regmac 11:01:13 03/04/11 (0)
- RE: Julian Hirsch at least... - josh358 15:34:40 03/03/11 (11)
- RE: Julian Hirsch at least... - Tony Lauck 17:20:33 03/03/11 (4)
- RE: Julian Hirsch at least... - josh358 17:59:57 03/03/11 (3)
- RE: Julian Hirsch at least... - Tony Lauck 10:19:48 03/04/11 (2)
- RE: Julian Hirsch at least... - josh358 16:45:15 03/04/11 (1)
- RE: Julian Hirsch at least... - Tony Lauck 06:27:10 03/05/11 (0)
- RE: Julian Hirsch at least... - Pat D 16:35:18 03/03/11 (5)
- That's not the point... - mkuller 18:55:11 03/03/11 (3)
- Nothing original here. This started in the 1930's. - Tony Lauck 10:42:07 03/04/11 (2)
- Ahh, J. Peter Moncrieff.... - mkuller 11:00:55 03/04/11 (1)
- RE: Ahh, J. Peter Moncrieff.... - Tony Lauck 11:14:12 03/04/11 (0)
- RE: Julian Hirsch at least... - josh358 17:02:54 03/03/11 (0)
- RE: Not true then... - josh358 14:58:03 03/03/11 (2)
- RE: Not true then... - Pat D 15:11:34 03/03/11 (1)
- RE: Not true then... - josh358 15:26:59 03/03/11 (0)
- RE: Not true then... - rick_m 12:31:32 03/03/11 (0)
- RE: Not true then... - Tony Lauck 12:21:47 03/03/11 (2)
- RE: CDP-101 - rick_m 12:35:03 03/03/11 (1)
- RE: CDP-101 - Tony Lauck 12:38:13 03/03/11 (0)
- How about Godfather? Uncle? Next door Neighbor? - kerr 07:24:56 03/03/11 (0)
- I'll just give you - E-Stat 06:24:35 03/03/11 (0)